Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,585
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

0Z Guidance Discussion 12/23/2010


Dr No

Recommended Posts

The biggest difference to me is the timing. Why is it so different? The maps themselves do not look bad but I am finding it strange that the NAM is so much faster than the Euro. I think tonight's runs will really open some eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 386
  • Created
  • Last Reply

keep in Mind Mitch the Euro is Muich slower with this event so snow into DC sat afternoon would be faster

I know, I was just sayin' why bash a model that just gave me bonus snow

probably not right

look at all the snow it gave MASS only 60 hrs ago (between .5-1" qpf) and they ended up with .1-.25"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should be careful with OTS, I guess I mean it won't be a big hooker into the coast, likely a glancing blow. Not truly out to sea and to Bermuda, just not a monster event like the ECM.

It looks to me that the NAM taken at face value would be a bit of a wide turn but it would hook pretty violently back to the left....I thought it looked favorable for New England, and perhaps it would come back enough for the rest of I-95, but hard to say for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah I wish people would understand, I am just analyzing the 0Z NAM itself, not making a forecast. This run wouldn't do it, that is all I said. Really my thoughts change little based off the NAM.

I understand what you are saying. It seems extroplated the NAM could bring the storm NNE but likely only scrape eastern parts of the Mid Atlantic and then more likely give LI and eastern New England and Maine a good hit as it intesifies later and further north then say the previous Euro runs much further south bomb. Small differences in the early to mid range can magnify themselves out in the mid and longer range especially with respect to sensible weather experienced. Again just analyzing the 0z NAM run and all and all it still in, in the general sense, keeping the game going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I was just sayin' why bash a model that just gave me bonus snow

probably not right

look at all the snow it gave MASS only 60 hrs ago (between .5-1" qpf) and they ended up with .1-.25"

Mitch..that's why the NAM should be looked at within 60...Last Sunday's NAM gave me a few inches of snow tonight..I see the stars instead..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM joins the rest forming a closed 5h low over the MA, good news. Don't sweat the details outside of 60h ladies and germs...from what I see it didn't miss by a whole lot. The NAM is on board for a major system IMO, let's see what tomorrow brings.

Bingo! Looks slower as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

84 is decent and nowhere near as bad as the NAM was made out to be. Its probably gonna scrape, but its the 84 hour NAM. Reading here, you would think the low was going to Bermuda.

I don't even think its a scrape (i.e., looks closer than that)

To my untrained eye, the NAM 84 cutoff was about about 15 minutes before this thing went nuclear. 1004 surface low on the SE coast, nice closed 850 low there already and all kinds of energy rounding the base of a deep troff. Looks like a match being struck in a room full of black powder to me.

What I think some are seeing is the sw to ne orientation of the paltry reflections on the weenie radar and drawing in a storm track from that (not the mets, mind you).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you really believe or want to use the NAM at the end of its run can be used to justify that?

would you not agree that it is a HUGE step, vs. all prior runs, toward the Euro?

that's all that matter right now

every run is getting better so no need to take it literally at this time

I was just analyzing the 0z NAM not making a prediction about if it is right or not. I thought that was the point of this thread. Do I believe the NAM, not a chance. I have seen it have crazy solutions outside 48 hours and even inside 24 hours it has a hiccup sometimes, but we are providing analysis of what this solution shows and that is all I was doing. If the 0z NAM were correct in the evolution of this system, then it does probably take the mega bomb gulf low solution of the euro out of play. That is not a statement that I am taking the euro off the table, just that the NAM does not agree currently with the euro evolution of the system. Is this perhaps some intermediate step towards a euro solution...perhaps but that is merely speculative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quick analysis....

hour 30 southern wave starts to interact with piece of energy over SD....this cause the southern stream wave to go from positive (ie. stop moving SE into TX) to slightly negative at hour 48...it's responsible for the more widespread snow in the OH valley and eventually light snow in the MA late on christmas.

this interaction is not allowing the southern stream to sink into TX and wait for the main jet streak....thus you have a main trough which only digs into the TN Valley instead of the gulf coast...which when the full phase occurs you have less time to pull this thing up the coast....

not saying its right or wrong...but the main difference between this run of the NAM and the last 4 runs of the Euro is ultimately how deep the main trough digs prior to and as it goes negative...

just thoughts

GREAT GREAT POST, That is perfect analysis of the 00z nam and why there are two sides of people who think good/b ad on this run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this run because while it doesnt show the bomb that the Euro's do, it brings more of us potentially back int the game (albeit small). At face value it is not a big score, but with biases of the NAM, I think many are happy with the "trend", as we know we are continuing to see the evolution of a potentially nice solution for many. We all do not need the 2' of snow, just some for many is nice. Just observations a from a hobbyist that is trying to keep a lid on expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just analyzing the 0z NAM not making a prediction about if it is right or not. I thought that was the point of this thread. Do I believe the NAM, not a chance. I have seen it have crazy solutions outside 48 hours and even inside 24 hours it has a hiccup sometimes, but we are providing analysis of what this solution shows and that is all I was doing. If the 0z NAM were correct in the evolution of this system, then it does probably take the mega bomb gulf low solution of the euro out of play. That is not a statement that I am taking the euro off the table, just that the NAM does not agree currently with the euro evolution of the system. Is this perhaps some intermediate step towards a euro solution...perhaps but that is merely speculative.

How can you say the 84HR map doesn't show system poised to bomb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we love it. Well, not psuhoffman but he has never liked a storm.

It is what it is...weather I like it or not will not change the solution or eventual outcome. I am not going to be upset if this NAM solution has merit and this evolves into a more modest event xmas night. My life will not change because of it. But if I had my choice I would rather root for the truly epic solution of the Euro over a modest overrunning type event or even the possibility of a more run of the mill modest coastal that could form out of this NAM solution. It is also very possible the NAM is going through a transition towards the Euro and just is lost in between at the moment. That is my gut feeling but I have no hard evidence to support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got in here to check some of the 00Z discussion on the NAM. Interesting. Just from my own glance, comparing today's 12Z at 84h at to the current 72h at 00Z (valid 00Z Dec. 26), it appears the 500 mb trough is sharper and narrower. And, has a more south-to-north component rather than southwest-northeast. I don't know if that means a whole lot, but it does appear better than what the earlier 12Z cycle had. I certainly understand the view that it's "not quite there" yet. But, as other's have said, another step in the right direction?

Sorry if this was asked before, but could the noticably different evolution be due to new data getting in now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks to me that the NAM taken at face value would be a bit of a wide turn but it would hook pretty violently back to the left....I thought it looked favorable for New England, and perhaps it would come back enough for the rest of I-95, but hard to say for sure.

84 hour NAM 500H compared to the 96 hour 12Z Euro seems to have the flow more parallel to the coast with much stronger ridging ahead. I agree, the NAM extrapolated would probably be a hit for coastal locations, not sure about inland. Wonder what the Euro would look like if the ridging out ahead built up quicker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Im seeing everyones enthusiasm over the NAM. Its handling of the two streams is completely different than the Euro, and the end result is definately not the same. The trough digs much less on the NAM, resulting in a further north surface low development. Sure this would bomb in later frames, but taken literally it would end up screwing most of the southern MA, the same areas that the Euro buried. If we want an all encompassing east coast storm, we want the two streams to remain separate longer ala Euro, not this early phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

84 hour NAM 500H compared to the 96 hour 12Z Euro seems to have the flow more parallel to the coast with much stronger ridging ahead. I agree, the NAM extrapolated would probably be a hit for coastal locations, not sure about inland. Wonder what the Euro would look like if the ridging out ahead built up quicker?

Luckily this is still at the far end of the NAM's range, which is rarely dead on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Im seeing everyones enthusiasm over the NAM. Its handling of the two streams is completely different than the Euro, and the end result is definately not the same. The trough digs much less on the NAM, resulting in a further north surface low development. Sure this would bomb in later frames, but taken literally it would end up screwing most of the southern MA, the same areas that the Euro buried. If we want an all encompassing east coast storm, we want the two streams to remain separate longer ala Euro, not this early phase.

I agree fully! People are getting all excited over the surface reflection at the end of the run. Sure it might be the same result at the surface at 84hrs, but it is getting there in a completely different manner IMO. Its not so much what the surface looks like as it is how that surface reflection gets there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Im seeing everyones enthusiasm over the NAM. Its handling of the two streams is completely different than the Euro, and the end result is definately not the same. The trough digs much less on the NAM, resulting in a further north surface low development. Sure this would bomb in later frames, but taken literally it would end up screwing most of the southern MA, the same areas that the Euro buried. If we want an all encompassing east coast storm, we want the two streams to remain separate longer ala Euro, not this early phase.

You've got some inland folks further north who might not agree with your last sentence. It's just guidance....all of it. A couple more days worth of runs for everybody to remain nervous! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you say the 84HR map doesn't show system poised to bomb?

it is about to bomb, but its doing so with a different vort then the euro uses, mostly northern branch dominated, and its happening east of Wilmington NC.

The Euro bombs the southern system that gets totally washed out on the NAM, and the low begins its rapid deepening phase while over northern Florida not east of NC. Is the NAM a train wreck, no. Is it in the "euro" camp, no. Its somewhere in between with a totally different storm evolution then any other model had at 12z. We will just have to wait and see what other 0z guidance has to say. IMO its way too soon to make conclusions about what the 0z NAM solution might mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should be careful with OTS, I guess I mean it won't be a big hooker into the coast, likely a glancing blow. Not truly out to sea and to Bermuda, just not a monster event like the ECM.

Wouldn't you think the energetic injection of vorticity knifing out of Manitoba Canada and rounding the

major short wave trough will sharpen that trough and force it to dig just as the trough

nears the coast and the Gulf Stream waters off the Carolinas? Isn't this classic to

spin up a coastal low? Seems to me the Canadian infusion of vorticity makes all the diff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Im seeing everyones enthusiasm over the NAM. Its handling of the two streams is completely different than the Euro, and the end result is definately not the same. The trough digs much less on the NAM, resulting in a further north surface low development. Sure this would bomb in later frames, but taken literally it would end up screwing most of the southern MA, the same areas that the Euro buried. If we want an all encompassing east coast storm, we want the two streams to remain separate longer ala Euro, not this early phase.

i do like the overall position of the nam, it is a good trend in euros direction, i just dont get overly excited over the NAM at 84 hrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly the same as the NAM at 500 more or less at least in terms of the speed...not what I was wanting to see, thats for sure.

the 5H trough is deeper than NAM with the 570 line down to the Gulf shoreline and NAM is a couple hundred miles to the north of it

EDIT: maybe only 100+ miles, but the trough is further west, which I forgot to say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...