Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2020 Short/Medium Range Severe Thread


Hoosier
 Share

Recommended Posts

   Day 2 Convective Outlook  
   NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
   1238 PM CDT Wed Mar 18 2020

   Valid 191200Z - 201200Z

   ...THERE IS AN ENHANCED RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS PORTIONS
   OF NORTHERN MO...EXTREME SOUTHEAST NE AND SOUTHERN IA AS WELL AS
   FROM CENTRAL AR INTO CENTRAL IN...

   ...SUMMARY...
   Severe thunderstorms are expected from the lower Missouri Valley and
   Ozarks vicinity into the middle Mississippi and lower Ohio Valleys
   on Thursday. Damaging gusts, isolated large hail and tornadoes are
   possible, mainly during the afternoon into the evening hours.

   ...Synopsis...

   A compact shortwave trough will eject northeast from the southern
   Plains to the Great Lakes on Thursday. As this occurs, intense deep
   layer southwesterly shear will overspread much of the Ozarks into
   the mid-MS and lower OH Valley vicinity while a deepening surface
   low develops east/northeast across KS to IA by 00z, to the Great
   Lakes/Canadian border by Friday morning. 

   Showers and thunderstorms may be ongoing Thursday morning in a
   strong warm advection regime across the mid-MS Valley and lower OH
   Valley. A warm front extending from the NE/KS border area
   east/southeast to near St. Louis to southern IN early Thursday will
   steadily lift northward through the afternoon. By late
   afternoon/early evening, the surface low will be near the NE/IA/MO
   tri-state area with the warm front extending across central IA to
   near the WI/IL border eastward into northern IN/OH. A cold front
   will extend southward from the low into eastern OK and
   central/southern TX. 60s surface dewpoints will be common across
   much of the warm sector, with mid to upper 60s dewpoints possible
   from eastern OK/TX across the Ozark Plateau toward western
   KY/southern IL/MO Bootheel region.

   Cloud cover across the region will inhibit destabilization somewhat,
   but steep midlevel lapse rates and increasing low level moisture
   will result in MLCAPE values increasing to 1000-1500 J/kg by
   afternoon. 850-700 mb southwesterly flow will likewise increase to
   45-55 kt as the upper trough shifts eastward during the afternoon
   and evening. Supercells will initially be possible ahead of the cold
   front, but may tend to grow upscale into bowing segments with time
   as deep layer shear will become more unidirectional into the evening
   hours. Nevertheless, conditions will be favorable for damaging
   gusts, large hail and tornadoes across portions of the Ozarks into
   the lower Ohio Valley.

   Further north near the surface low, effective SRH will be quite a
   bit stronger due to the influence of the deepening low and warm
   front. Backed low level flow in this vicinity and better directional
   shear will result in a corridor of greater tornado potential during
   the late afternoon/evening. Large hail and damaging gusts will also
   be possible as supercells and bowing segment shift northeast toward
   southern WI/northern IL during the evening.

   ..Leitman.. 03/18/2020
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interest in this setup has been piqued a tad over the last couple days, I might do some local spotting if something comes up toward WI. Was thinking about going into Iowa; but between the abrupt societal lockdown/economic disruption, disagreement among the CAMs on where the strongest storms will track, likelihood of having to contend with the MS River and the poor chasing terrain nearby, and Iowa's general track record with tornado threats (doesn't produce when you expect it do, does when you don't) I'm leaning against it at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CheeselandSkies said:

My interest in this setup has been piqued a tad over the last couple days, I might do some local spotting if something comes up toward WI. Was thinking about going into Iowa; but between the abrupt societal lockdown/economic disruption, disagreement among the CAMs on where the strongest storms will track, likelihood of having to contend with the MS River and the poor chasing terrain nearby, and Iowa's general track record with tornado threats (doesn't produce when you expect it do, does when you don't) I'm leaning against it at this point.

Yea.  There might be an outbreak of low-topped supercell storms coming out of Iowa as the dry slot and upper low sweeps in from the west.  Not a lot of CAPE needed because the tropopause/EL will be low.  It's hard to predict if there will be any really persistent cells though.  Updrafts might have a lot of spin but are usually kind of small and can be snuffed out pretty easily in the dry slot.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, frostfern said:

Yea.  There might be an outbreak of low-topped supercell storms coming out of Iowa as the dry slot and upper low sweeps in from the west.  Not a lot of CAPE needed because the tropopause/EL will be low.  It's hard to predict if there will be any really persistent cells though.  Updrafts might have a lot of spin but are usually kind of small and can be snuffed out pretty easily in the dry slot.

Yep, therein lies the rub with this kind of setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PAH now 70/64, cloudy with a south wind gusting to 24.  The threat down that way and into sw to central IN has always been for late evening into the overnight hours and kinematically rather than instability driven.  Will have to see how things progress today.  Any scattered clearing could rev things up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago Storm said:

SPC is wayyy too overzealous, as seems to be par for the course these days.

Why not use math? The 10% tornado area is 113,928 sq mi, the 5% tornado area is 140,381 sq mi, and the 2% tornado area is 168,806 sq mi. The SPC system forecasts a probability that any one point in a certain zone will see a report within 25 miles. That means that each point in space is something of a 25 mi radius storm-report-detector. A 25-mi radius circle takes up (pi)*(25)^2 square miles of area. Aside from using more advanced methods of statistics, let's just apply simple math. The number of 25 mile circles covered by the 10% outlook is 58.02, and likewise, 71.50 circles, and 85.97 circles. Then (58.02)*(0.10)+(71.50)*(0.05)+(85.97)*(0.02) = 11.1 tornadoes.

11 seems like a possible number of tornadoes. Qualitatively, I think it's reasonable to say the 10% risk for a large section of the Ohio Valley/Mississippi may seem too much. Otherwise, using real statistical methods may calculate a different number of expected tornadoes.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16Z HRRR is meh for anything east of I-35 in IA. That's at least a five hour drive for me after working 3AM-noon (actually 12:20, had to stay late today as with every day this week due to COVID social distancing and sanitizing precautions slowing down the workflow, among other things). The expansion of the northern 10% and 5% tornado areas eastward makes no sense to me. Trend of the strongest activity being further west (closer to the MO river than the MS, at least until well after dark) plus the societal lockdown/"avoid discretionary travel" guidelines will have me sitting this one out.

I keep thinking one of these years we have to get a legit early season outbreak involving the upper Midwest again (3/13/90, 4/8/99, 3/12/06, etc) but it hasn't happened yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The destabilization will be driven by cold air advection aloft more than surface heating.  The upper low moving in was producing thundersnow showers over the southwestern US. These will be very low-topped cells.  Less instability is needed.  The bigger problem will be whether there's enough upward forcing to overcome dry air entertainment with such a big shear-to-instability ratio.  I don't think CAMS really know how to handle these kind of small-scale details.  Chasing small fast-moving cells that can poop out at any moment will be frustrating.  It also gets dark early this time of year.  If it's a late-evening event it will be mostly in the dark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, frostfern said:

The destabilization will be driven by cold air advection aloft more than surface heating.  The upper low moving in was producing thundersnow showers over the southwestern US. These will be very low-topped cells.  Less instability is needed.  The bigger problem will be whether there's enough upward forcing to overcome dry air entertainment with such a big shear-to-instability ratio.  I don't think CAMS really know how to handle these kind of small-scale details.  Chasing small fast-moving cells that can poop out at any moment will be frustrating.  It also gets dark early this time of year.  If it's a late-evening event it will be mostly in the dark.

Yep, been there, done that several times over the last several years. No thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED  
TORNADO WARNING  
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PADUCAH KY  
332 PM CDT THU MAR 19 2020  
  
THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN PADUCAH HAS ISSUED A  
  
* TORNADO WARNING FOR...  
  SOUTHEASTERN PERRY COUNTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS...  
  SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS...  
  NORTH CENTRAL JACKSON COUNTY IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS...  
  NORTHWESTERN FRANKLIN COUNTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS...  
  
* UNTIL 415 PM CDT.  
      
* AT 332 PM CDT, A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A TORNADO  
  WAS LOCATED NEAR PINCKNEYVILLE, MOVING EAST AT 50 MPH.  
  
  HAZARD...TORNADO AND QUARTER SIZE HAIL.  
  
  SOURCE...RADAR INDICATED ROTATION.  
  
  IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT   
           SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED.   
           DAMAGE TO ROOFS, WINDOWS, AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR.  TREE   
           DAMAGE IS LIKELY.  
  
* LOCATIONS IMPACTED INCLUDE...  
  DU QUOIN, PINCKNEYVILLE, REND LAKE AREA, SESSER, VALIER, TAMAROA,  
  INA, NORTH CITY, WALTONVILLE, BONNIE, EWING, NASON AND ST. JOHNS.  
  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cyclone77 said:

If I had all the time in the world I likely would have chased today.  But as per usual work limited my chance.  Hopefully some storms can manage to make it in here later this evening for a little lightning.

It's a good thing you didn't, as the cold front under-cut just about everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting to be some general agreement on a potential severe event in the western lakes on Saturday. Specifics to be determined as the event draws closer, but right now there is potential for a pretty decent event. Guidance currently has an impressive upper level system moving into the region with a deep surface low (~990mb). Speed shear is off the charts, with at least some directional shear. Thermos don't look to be a problem either, with 60F dews being brought well north. Lapse rates appear to be decent as well, with thermo profiles generating 1000-2000 CAPE even on the coarse globals. I'm sure this will somehow trend to garbage, like pretty much every snow event this winter, but it's something to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MIstorm97 said:

Starting to be some general agreement on a potential severe event in the western lakes on Saturday. Specifics to be determined as the event draws closer, but right now there is potential for a pretty decent event. Guidance currently has an impressive upper level system moving into the region with a deep surface low (~990mb). Speed shear is off the charts, with at least some directional shear. Thermos don't look to be a problem either, with 60F dews being brought well north. Lapse rates appear to be decent as well, with thermo profiles generating 1000-2000 CAPE even on the coarse globals. I'm sure this will somehow trend to garbage, like pretty much every snow event this winter, but it's something to watch.

The rare IL dry-line is looking like a good possibility.

However...lapse rates look poor and the potential for widespread warm sector debris is high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chicago Storm said:

The rare IL dry-line is looking like a good possibility.

However...lapse rates look poor and the potential for widespread warm sector debris is high.

7-7.5 c/km are not poor lapse rates, only the GFS is closer to 6.5 which is workable but also poorly underdone by a shitty model. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...