Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

One More Shot: Feb 20-21 Event


Tar Heel Snow
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, SnowDawg said:

Guys the NWS will stay conservative as long as they possibly can, sometimes to their own peril. I had a forecast of 0 inches and R/S mix 12 hours before getting almost 6 inches a little over a week ago. 

Yes, for good reason. This is not a weekend snow that affects relatively low population areas. This is coming in on a weekday and has much more implications if snow does materialize. On the flip side, if snow doesn't materialize and the NWS hyped it up, it would get picked up by the media and turned into a forecast bust. I think they are doing the responsible thing here given the extreme model disparity atm. I think they did a good job explaining why they weren't favoring the snowier solutions at this time, instead of just throwing them out and running with the Euro/UK. From a keyboard meteorologist perspective, as 99% of this board (myself included) is, it is frustrating and it does sting and lead to anxiety (as reading the AFD last few days has for me) but we also do not have any liability in this forecast. 

 

That being said, the negativity here is surprising. I know the Euro trends aren't great, but I'm not putting every egg in one basket. There has never been a storm that was ironed out 2+ days before go time. I think we are in the same place as we were yesterday. Obviously the CMC and GFS flipped but the GFS + Nam combo is certainly not to be brushed aside, especially at this range. Euro has flipped on this storm a couple times, as have the ensembles. I think we are slowly settling into a situation where the models will move into a compromise. For South Carolina people, this was never going to be your storm. There may have been a couple runs that threw you a bone, but this has consistently been N Ga mtns and a NC storm. It would not surprise me if the upstate saw flakes and some minor accumulations but temps most certainly will be an issue. The juiciest runs have tended to bring precip in faster which works against SC people as the cold doesn't have sufficient time to filter in. Also, the amped solutions do include the dreaded energy transfer, so foothills locations would not benefit with that either. 

 

With all that said, if you were in charge of a public forecast 48hrs out with this storm, what would yours look like with everything you've seen so far? That is what these Mets have to do and that is a lot tougher than bickering over negative model runs or clinging to ones you like. I took a stab at it for NC. Here it is:

Charlotte - Moisture is biggest issue, temps may not promote accumulation before moisture moves out. 1 in high end. Likely- No accumulation

Triad - Moisture is biggest issue. 1-2 in high end. Likely- Dusting

Triangle - How much Moisture? 5 in high end. Likely- Dusting to 1/2 in

Sandhills- I think moisture will be fine here. I am not convinced temps will promote all snow throughout. 3 in high end. Likely- Around 1 in

Greenville- Best spot, imo. 8 in high end. Likely- 1-3 in 

New Bern - Temps will be an issue on the BL but I like the consistency in crashing them with plentiful moisture. 5 in high end. Likely- 1 in

NE NC - Moisture is a big question here and the variability in accumulations obviously will depend on that. I think 4-5 in is the high end. Likely- 1-2 in

  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NorthHillsWx said:

<clipped>

...Also, the amped solutions do include the dreaded energy transfer, so foothills locations would not benefit with that either. 

</clipped>

 

Fantastic post, thanks for your insight! Do you know of any publications online that describe the Miller-A energy transfer scenario and the underlying processes? I'm fascinated by how the storm puts itself on "hold" during the transfer to the coast and practically skips over upstate SC. Thanks in advance for any info you can provide!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, griteater said:

The Euro is 0 for 5 in SE Winter Storm Model Battles  :lol:

JbaL2y6.gif

 

 

Really? I would not have expected that thanks.  My understanding is that the snow event from last weekend in GA was also poorly modeled by the euro, but well done by the nam.  See I write that, but I'm having such a hard time believing it.  I want to weenie out but my skeptical mind just won't let me! :wacko2:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite being poorly worded my post about the NWS really wasn't meant as a shot. Conservative is absolutely the right play right now. My point was more aimed at not getting upset or anxious about them not being gung-ho for snow right now when they are just hedging their bets and biding their time. It really has no bearing on what will or will not happen. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear those of you talking about the responsibility of the network / TV Mets. That being said, I treasure this board because I am responsible for my family.
For the Snowmaggedon we had in ATL - my family was home warm and safe because of those here. I simply chose to work from home that day and my kids did not go to school.
Thursday could be a challenge because of timing.
Had the 2/8 event occurred on 2/7, the impact in my area would have been somewhat significant.
I guess it is all about perspective.
Regardless, I appreciate the analysis and thoughtful discussion here. Sure, I want 6” of snow IMBY - not that realistic. So, I come here, I read, I learn, and I prepare.

Have a great day.


. Pro

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM has its flaws, but I think it's ironic to see it written off by so many mets. The two minor events that have occurred so far in W NC, NW SC and parts of Georgia were nailed by the NAM, days in advance. It's had solid footing this year.

 

Also, as someone living in western NC, I have a hard time buying dry solutions - everything has overachieved in qpf this winter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding this Thursday event, obviously lower elevation in georgia seem to be only a cold rain now, but curious if a short drive up ga 400 to suches (elevation 3000-3500) would give me a shot at seeing a nice snow?  i dont have access to reading the thermal profiles, so not sure if elevation would help out in north ga or they would just see a cold rain as well?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, neatlburbwthrguy said:

regarding this Thursday event, obviously lower elevation in georgia seem to be only a cold rain now, but curious if a short drive up ga 400 to suches (elevation 3000-3500) would give me a shot at seeing a nice snow?  i dont have access to reading the thermal profiles, so not sure if elevation would help out in north ga or they would just see a cold rain as well?

 

Blood mountain Hwy 19 (near suches) is where I crashed my motorcycle and broke six vertebrae and eight ribs. It’s usually good for snow but a warm 700-800 level is a bit concerning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

The NAM has its flaws, but I think it's ironic to see it written off by so many mets. The two minor events that have occurred so far in W NC, NW SC and parts of Georgia were nailed by the NAM, days in advance. It's had solid footing this year.

Yeah, but saying that the times when it's snowed supports the model that said that it was going to snow, so therefore we should believe it when it says it will snow is at most half of the consideration. I could make a 'model' that says it will snow every day, and it would meet that standard. The other part of it is: how often has it called for significant snow and then been wrong this far out?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LithiaWx said:

Blood mountain Hwy 19 (near suches) is where I crashed my motorcycle and broke six vertebrae and eight ribs. It’s usually good for snow but a warm 700-800 level is a bit concerning.  

Yeah a this time yesterday I would've said no doubt safe bet for some snow. But man the NAM and GFS are trending quickly in the wrong direction for mid-level temps even up here in the Mtns. If they do end up being over amped then I'd expect snow totals in the N GA Mtns to tick back upward. If not though, then it's probably going to just be a long day of sloppy wintry mix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BornAgain13 said:

We are entering into , in my opinion,  the deadly NAM range. It should be accurate and cling to what it shows.... will it hold serve or surrender at 18z??

I can vouch that It's been brutally accurate around Charlotte the last several winter storms at short range for p-types.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GSP AFD.....they are slowly increasing confidence in an event Thursday...

All told, the best 2 to 3 inch snow accumulations for this
relatively short duration event should affect the higher ridges of
the NC mountains, with lighter accumulations east of the mountains
and mainly northwest of I-85, but with a dusting southeast of the
Interstate. Some wintry weather potential will be featured for most
zones in the HWO this afternoon, but no Watches will be posted at
present.

https://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=GSP&product=AFD&format=ci&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...