Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,170
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

February 5-7 Wintry Mess Potential


weatherwiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 2/5/2020 at 6:23 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Waiting? He’s been getting crushed the past several seasons...with like 50” in that Mar 17 fluff bomb lol. 

Expand  

Yeah... weren’t record depths set either last year or the year before? He’s done fine. Don’t believe the hype.

Glad to see we don’t have to deal with any icing here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 6:47 PM, ORH_wxman said:

I mean, yeah...they get a lot of snow. But those true 12-18 (with higher jacks) deformation/fronto bombs are not that common. Further east definitely gets more of those...esp recently. 

So I get the excitement of those. 

Expand  

Yeah we get plenty of snowfall, but 12"+ events are much more common in SNE.  

I've been hoping for double digits, so anything 10" or greater in this will more than satisfy that itch.  I could still see more mixing than expected or lower ratios bringing 8" of the densest white material ever... but I just like a nice frozen QPF bomb.  We don't do those frozen heavy precip events like SNE does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 4:08 PM, CoastalWx said:

That’s insane, but believable wherever that occurs because the dynamics with this are really impressive.

Expand  

I love that the mesoscale banding and low level frontogenesis forcing look to be nearly stationary over the northern Champlain Valley (MBY, which is the only thing that really matters) sometime during the day on Friday.  The moisture transport from that jet looks absolutely fantastic.  Could be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:04 PM, das said:

I love that the mesoscale banding and low level frontogenesis forcing look to be nearly stationary over the northern Champlain Valley (MBY, which is the only thing that really matters) sometime during the day on Friday.  The moisture transport from that jet looks absolutely fantastic.  Could be fun.

Expand  

We need more posters like yourself, ha.  You are in Charlotte, right?  

The Champlain Valley looks to take a crosshair on this one too.  Northerly surface drain leading to Champlain Valley Convergence under the mid-level lift could be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:09 PM, dryslot said:

That it is with wave 1.

Expand  

well ...I dunno, the 'wave' identity is getting a bit entropy - it's starting to just look like an extended warm frontal arm with the light snow axis lifted up and stalled near your neck of the woods... back through northern NH/VT... While much of interior SNE lulls for 12 hours. 

Appears the main thrust is a rather potent deepening that looks like it's about to bomb on the mid-Atl to ACK transit - so perhaps similar to the 12z if like 25 to 50 mile S.  We'll see where this goes... I guess there's "some" sort of wave 1 identity but it's really more like squirting out meso circulations rather than a bona fide 'wave 1'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:13 PM, Typhoon Tip said:

well ...I dunno, the 'wave' identity is getting a bit entropy - it's starting to just look like an extended warm frontal arm with the snow axis up hear your neck of the woods... back through northern NH/VT... While much of interior SNE lulls for 12 hours. 

Appears the main thrust is a rather potent deepening that looks like it's about to bomb on the mid-Atl to ACK transit - so perhaps similar to the 12z if like 25 to 50 mile S

Expand  

Second parts going to be a little more amped then the 12z run, Can already see it @H5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:23 PM, CoastalWx said:

So much for the 12z snow. Tossed.

Expand  

That was tossed when it came out. Lol. No other model supported it. 

The main interest for me on this is whether siggy icing happens inland. The snow aspect is garbage. Front end thump looks weak sauce. Prob sleet contaminated anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:25 PM, ORH_wxman said:

That was tossed when it came out. Lol. No other model supported it. 

The main interest for me on this is whether siggy icing happens inland. The snow aspect is garbage. Front end thump looks weak sauce. Prob sleet contaminated anyway. 

Expand  

No matter the track, that looks nasty for Dave verbatim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2020 at 8:26 PM, dryslot said:

That was crap here, That SLP tracked further west right over SE MA this run.

Expand  

The Friday stuff has a PF to Rangeley look when examining the midlevels. It’s trying to collapse SE pretty fast late in the game but I think by the time it does it’s mostly scraps. Maybe a few inches in your ‘hood at the end of it can do it quick enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...