MJO812 Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Tucked in solution and still cold 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitzbuhel Craver Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Epic Super Bowl Blizzard... what could be better? I’m gonna pretend I didn’t see that run. Could just as easily end up the Cleveland super bomb also. Just another OP solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:03 PM, Ginx snewx said: 1.5 to 1.9 qpf white lol . If only Expand That would Save the season. Any clowns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Honestly although it’s useless to discuss on this level but verbatim it seems to blow its load up to the pike and then occlude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:06 PM, weathafella said: Honestly although it’s useless to discuss on this level but verbatim it seems to blow its load up to the pike and then occlude Expand I think it's a N NJ special the way it tucks in and looking at the RH fields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:06 PM, weathafella said: Honestly although it’s useless to discuss on this level but verbatim it seems to blow its load up to the pike and then occlude Expand Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:08 PM, OSUmetstud said: I think it's a N NJ special the way it tucks in and looking at the RH fields. Expand Only .4qpf difference not that it matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:05 PM, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: That would Save the season. Any clowns? Expand Yea right in this thread,cmon multiple by ten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Staggering differences between Euro/GFS...almost laughable really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:05 PM, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: That would Save the season. Any clowns? Expand woah dude this is a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:12 PM, weatherwiz said: Staggering differences between Euro/GFS...almost laughable really. Expand 60/40 compromise, congrats interior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 EPS has a nice signal, Will has those nice EPS maps, not sure he will post them 204 hrs out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:10 PM, Ginx snewx said: Only .4qpf difference not that it matters Expand Well I was looking at the RH fields too, I think the max snow would run from NW NJ north into eastern NY. Normal coastal jack of course, too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleetussnow Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:12 PM, weatherwiz said: Staggering differences between Euro/GFS...almost laughable really. Expand ONE of them is Dr. No. Which one? CMC is down with the GFS, but more west. The delta between the CMC and Euro is planetary. Behind door number three is the week wave that scoots out underneath us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:18 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: 60/40 compromise, congrats interior. Expand that might be congrats PA but seriously...and not just with this system but just overall...there have been times of enormous differences between the two. I totally understand the time frame we're dealing with but with technology and modeling supposedly becoming better diversions just keep getting worse. Perhaps they need to start canning some models, get rid of running them 4x per day and re-prioritize the focus in improving them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:18 PM, Bostonseminole said: EPS has a nice signal, Will has those nice EPS maps, not sure he will post them 204 hrs out Expand Too amped for my liking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:18 PM, Bostonseminole said: EPS has a nice signal, Will has those nice EPS maps, not sure he will post them 204 hrs out Expand Pretty huggy solution if you ask me....but it's 200 hour out, so I'm not really parsing this that closely right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:22 PM, weatherwiz said: that might be congrats PA but seriously...and not just with this system but just overall...there have been times of enormous differences between the two. I totally understand the time frame we're dealing with but with technology and modeling supposedly becoming better diversions just keep getting worse. Perhaps they need to start canning some models, get rid of running them 4x per day and re-prioritize the focus in improving them. Expand I don’t like the 4x runs either but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:23 PM, Snow88 said: Too amped for my liking Expand Yeah you are burnt toast on an EPS mean type track....New England would prob do ok...esp interior. But it's mostly meaningless right now. The pattern isn't very good for the coast though...esp further south. Need something to change either out west or in the NAO....or just get really lucky with a needle-threader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:22 PM, weatherwiz said: that might be congrats PA but seriously...and not just with this system but just overall...there have been times of enormous differences between the two. I totally understand the time frame we're dealing with but with technology and modeling supposedly becoming better diversions just keep getting worse. Perhaps they need to start canning some models, get rid of running them 4x per day and re-prioritize the focus in improving them. Expand Meh, they're still getting better. I think what we've discovered with higher resolution and more frequent model runs, is that run to run variability is very high with a complicated process like the atmosphere. When we were limited to sparse data and infrequent model runs they seemed more locked than was actuality. In the long term they really are just another ensemble member. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:27 PM, ORH_wxman said: Yeah you are burnt toast on an EPS mean type track....New England would prob do ok...esp interior. But it's mostly meaningless right now. The pattern isn't very good for the coast though...esp further south. Need something to change either out west or in the NAO....or just get really lucky with a needle-threader. Expand I thought the pattern was better for this one? another needle threader.. Yuck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:31 PM, Bostonseminole said: I thought the pattern was better for this one? another needle threader.. Yuck! Expand It is better with a transient PNA ridge but not alot of cold air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:25 PM, ORH_wxman said: Pretty huggy solution if you ask me....but it's 200 hour out, so I'm not really parsing this that closely right now Expand Alot of nice solutions 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:26 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: I don’t like the 4x runs either but... Expand I think they make sense for short-range (inside 96-hours) but not outside that. it just really adds further confusing instead of clarification. On 1/24/2020 at 7:30 PM, OceanStWx said: Meh, they're still getting better. I think what we've discovered with higher resolution and more frequent model runs, is that run to run variability is very high with a complicated process like the atmosphere. When we were limited to sparse data and infrequent model runs they seemed more locked than was actuality. In the long term they really are just another ensemble member. Expand That's an excellent point. I think in the perfect world, the thought that higher resolution with more data inputs would result in far more accurate forecasts, however, that doesn't necessarily seem to be the case. With how complicated and complex the atmosphere in incorporating more variables just results in a more complex and highly variable results. Even in the short-term we've seen some drastic changes...especially with larger-scale features. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 I do have some fear for amped solutions. Makes me a little nervous seeing where the Euro/GFS sharpen the trough and how both advertise a rather significant MLJ streak rounding the base of the trough and where this occurs. Really too far out to be overly concerned about but is this can happen just a tad later our chances increase a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:37 PM, weatherwiz said: I think they make sense for short-range (inside 96-hours) but not outside that. it just really adds further confusing instead of clarification. That's an excellent point. I think in the perfect world, the thought that higher resolution with more data inputs would result in far more accurate forecasts, however, that doesn't necessarily seem to be the case. With how complicated and complex the atmosphere in incorporating more variables just results in a more complex and highly variable results. Even in the short-term we've seen some drastic changes...especially with larger-scale features. Expand Getting close to the convective scale introduces problems. Not my area of expertise, but I would imagine it leads to more of the chaos effect in the long term when you develop those small scale, but sometimes large magnitude features. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:31 PM, Bostonseminole said: I thought the pattern was better for this one? another needle threader.. Yuck! Expand It is better. I didn’t say it was great though. Lol. We have a better antecedent airmass...not a high bar to clear compared to tomorrow. There’s some western ridging. Maybe some Hudson Bay ridging too. But the airmass isn’t exceptional and the isn’t a great 50/50 type low so this would favor the interior all else equal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:23 PM, Snow88 said: Too amped for my liking Expand It's just eye candy right now...nothing more. But, the take away is that both major models have now shown a bomb in that 2/2-2/3 time frame. Doesn't mean much but that a system could be looming in and around that time frame. I certainly wouldn't be optimistic about though...not the way things cave in this season so far. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:41 PM, OceanStWx said: Getting close to the convective scale introduces problems. Not my area of expertise, but I would imagine it leads to more of the chaos effect in the long term when you develop those small scale, but sometimes large magnitude features. Expand I was actually going to get into that in my post...was reading a bit about that on a MedEd module a bit back. I think this explains (partly) the famous D10 "fantasy" storms that arise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 7:45 PM, WinterWolf said: It's just eye candy right now...nothing more. But, the take away is that both major models have now shown a bomb in that 2/2-2/3 time frame. Doesn't mean much but that a system could be looming in and around that time frame. I certainly wouldn't be optimistic about though...not the way things cave in this season so far. Expand Yea, I wouldn't expect a huge hit for us...I think from around president's day into early March will be more favorable for something closer to the magnitude of the early December event. It could be decent, though...probably some precip type issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now