Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Mid to Long Range Threats


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

I should have said *total misses for snow* 

 

Agree.

The Canadian is really painful  976 at the BM - 5 at 850  - 1 at 925 , 1 inch of liquid right along the coast and 37 LOL.

But we have been posting the BL issues in here for the last few days so no one should be shocked. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

This would have been colder if the storm actually phased.

 

Move on.

We told you 2 days ago the BL wasn`t close.

You need to be in the NW corner of NJ to see any snow.

We were never close. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, PB-99 said:

 

Agree.

The Canadian is really painful  976 at the BM - 5 at 850  - 1 at 925 , 1 inch of liquid right along the coast and 37 LOL.

But we have been posting the BL issues in here for the last few days so no one should be shocked. 

 

 

it's the year with no cold air....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PB-99 said:

 

No

37 B/L is the issue.

 

1583582400-dT0TRdY130o.png

 

If this was 50mi NW, it wouldn’t be as much of an issue. The issue is that it seems like light-mod precip which wouldn’t provide the dynamics needed to cool the column. Could that happen? Maybe, I’d lean towards not given the atrocious overall pattern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Thanks to the AO

and the MJO, EPO, NAO, warm water near Australia.  Literally nothing worked in our favor this year....I was lucky to get the 4 inches here on 1/18, that was about it other than some ice and snow to rains in early December

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PB-99 said:

 

You were never close. 

 

The blocking is the issue, the phase doesn’t happen because the southern stream kicks due east. While the northern stream wave gives us the light snow showers and or rain. If this would have phased, it would have been a monster and we would have had a blizzard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PB-99 said:

 

 I know you`re looking at this one already. 

 

Don`t lie....

gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_40.png

 

Had the Euro shown anything even close to resembling this, I'd be on it as well. But it did not, so not even looking twice (.....until 18z of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowFeen1 said:

The blocking is the issue, the phase doesn’t happen because the southern stream kicks due east. While the northern stream wave gives us the light snow showers and or rain. If this would have phased, it would have been a monster and we would have had a blizzard 

But the fast PAC flow was pointed out. The flow was never buckled enough to drive the height falls all the way N. 

The ridge just rolled over and it could not phase. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PB-99 said:

But the fast PAC flow was pointed out. The flow was never buckled enough to drive the height falls all the way N. 

The ridge just rolled over and it could not phase. 

 

Next storm the one you just pointed out to Anthony, there may be some blocking with that one, still way too early to call anything but that’s like our last grasp.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SnowFeen1 said:

Next storm the one you just pointed out to Anthony, there may be some blocking with that one, still way too early to call anything but that’s like our last grasp.

I don`t think that will last through the 18z run. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PB-99 said:

But the fast PAC flow was pointed out. The flow was never buckled enough to drive the height falls all the way N. 

The ridge just rolled over and it could not phase. 

 

It was obvious as could possibly be that Fri - Sat was doomed before it even began, well to some at least. 3/13 is totally bogus too 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

02-03 (President's day blizzard) followed 01-02 and 12-13 (great New England blizzard) after the dud of 11-12 so there's hope for next year

I don’t know. I think we’ve entered a period of mild winters becoming the norm. Snow may become more and more rare in this region. We shall see though.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...