Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Mid to Long Range Threats


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

I tend to to disagree with that with the NAO trending negative around that time

nao.sprd2.gif

That is not a neg NAO. That's a neutral NAO look that will likely trend positive as we get closer as it has most of the winter based on the graph above. Check out the GEFS today, it's about as positive as it gets in the LR. No blocking at all. This threat has apps runner written all over it. Would like to be wrong though.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

I guess we should all stop tracking the storm for next week since warmth always verifies and the eps says so.

yep, winter was canceled in mid January-go outside and do something productive instead of tracking fantasy day 7+ storms that never verify

-

definition of insanity:  Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Allsnow said:

Eps hinting at something around the 3/4. The cold air will be around for this event. Snow mean is decent 

That's our likely window-next week will have a crappy airmass, I would expect something if we get it the first week in March before the pattern goes back to what we've had all winter

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

That's our likely window-next week will have a crappy airmass, I would expect something if we get it the first week in March before the pattern goes back to what we've had all winter

whats so crappy about this airmass ?

850th.conus.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

it's in the mid to upper 30's at the surface-that won't cut it

then why this ? Like I said previously the system at this strength 991 will bring the cold enough air down to the lower levels  - the surface will be slightly warmer but the intensity of the snow could still cause accumulations and eventually even the surface will keep cooling that's why the EURO shows this - its probably not going to verify exactly like this though

prateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NEG NAO said:

then why this ? Like I said previously the system at this strength 991 will bring the cold enough air down to the lower levels  - the surface will be slightly warmer but the intensity of the snow could still cause accumulations and eventually even the surface will keep cooling that's why the EURO shows this - its probably not going to verify exactly like this though

prateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.png

if the system bombs, I'd agree.   Verbatim it's not that strong and you end up with mid 30's and white rain in all liklihood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎2‎/‎14‎/‎2020 at 8:49 PM, donsutherland1 said:

I was referring to today. That was yesterday’s 12z run. Both today’s 0z and 12z runs dropped the storm.

Not to be critical of Don or anyone else - the above post is one reason why  you have to keep all of the solutions for late next week on the table. Both the Euro and GFS were showing this weeks southern snow event almost a week ago - then they lost it -then within the last couple of days its back and will likely verify in some areas. Keep everything on the table !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

Not to be critical of Don or anyone else - the above post is one reason why  you have to keep all of the solutions for late next week on the table. Both the Euro and GFS were showing this weeks southern snow event almost a week ago - then they lost it -then within the last couple of days its back and will likely verify in some areas. Keep everything on the table !

Exactly

People are dismissing a storm a week out is being foolish. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJO812 said:

No I don't.  Stop defending him. You are another one who calls for warmth all the time.

Just put together data for my tick report using HPN data for our upcoming tick season. From January 2018 through January 2020, we have had 16 above normal months (>+0.3 C departure), 4 normal months (-0.3C < Normal < +0.3C), and 5 below average months (<-0.3C). Since January 2018 our average monthly mean temperatures have been running 1.0C above average or 1.7F above average. Not a whole lot of 'cold' to speak of. Not the greatest departure that we have seen over the last decade, but we are routinely above average. Doesn't mean it can't snow. Snow does not mean cold in the 2000s, most of the time time it means just cold enough. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JustinRP37 said:

Just put together data for my tick report using HPN data for our upcoming tick season. From January 2018 through January 2020, we have had 16 above normal months (>+0.3 C departure), 4 normal months (-0.3C < Normal < +0.3C), and 5 below average months (<-0.3C). Since January 2018 our average monthly mean temperatures have been running 1.0C above average or 1.7F above average. Not a whole lot of 'cold' to speak of. Not the greatest departure that we have seen over the last decade, but we are routinely above average. Doesn't mean it can't snow. Snow does not mean cold in the 2000s, most of the time time it means just cold enough. 

Past few summers have not been overly hot either.  The warmth has been concentrated in the fall and winter.....  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

Past few summers have not been overly hot either.  The warmth has been concentrated in the fall and winter.....  

I posted about that in the other thread. It is very difficult to have both super high heat and the super high dew points we are having. It is one reason why coastal Florida has never broken 100 degrees. This held down our high temperatures, but elevated our low temperatures. Our highest positive departures over the past two years were actually centered between July and September. In 2018 July was +1.2C, August was +2.4C, and September was +2.3C. Only month with a higher department was May 2018 at +2.8C. In 2019, July was +2.2C and October was +2.1C. March 2019 was -0.4C and and November was -1.8C for departures. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JustinRP37 said:

Just put together data for my tick report using HPN data for our upcoming tick season. From January 2018 through January 2020, we have had 16 above normal months (>+0.3 C departure), 4 normal months (-0.3C < Normal < +0.3C), and 5 below average months (<-0.3C). Since January 2018 our average monthly mean temperatures have been running 1.0C above average or 1.7F above average. Not a whole lot of 'cold' to speak of. Not the greatest departure that we have seen over the last decade, but we are routinely above average. Doesn't mean it can't snow. Snow does not mean cold in the 2000s, most of the time time it means just cold enough. 

Apparently epidemiologists predicted an increase in Lyme cases a few years back based on the numbers of acorns....more acorns, more places for mice to nest, more ticks, if my understanding was correct. had a Lone star tick ( not native to this region ) hanging out on my back side for a couple days, though it was a scab ( they are tricky ) I was lucky I do not show signs of meat allergy, which this tick can trigger. This winter has probably been warm enough that both ticks and mice remained active ( I know the mice are; they got shocked the few cold days we had and I saw a few frozen in the shed, don't get me started on hantavirus...)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, weatherpruf said:

Apparently epidemiologists predicted an increase in Lyme cases a few years back based on the numbers of acorns....more acorns, more places for mice to nest, more ticks, if my understanding was correct. had a Lone star tick ( not native to this region ) hanging out on my back side for a couple days, though it was a scab ( they are tricky ) I was lucky I do not show signs of meat allergy, which this tick can trigger. This winter has probably been warm enough that both ticks and mice remained active ( I know the mice are; they got shocked the few cold days we had and I saw a few frozen in the shed, don't get me started on hantavirus...)

:offtopic:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JustinRP37 said:

Just put together data for my tick report using HPN data for our upcoming tick season. From January 2018 through January 2020, we have had 16 above normal months (>+0.3 C departure), 4 normal months (-0.3C < Normal < +0.3C), and 5 below average months (<-0.3C). Since January 2018 our average monthly mean temperatures have been running 1.0C above average or 1.7F above average. Not a whole lot of 'cold' to speak of. Not the greatest departure that we have seen over the last decade, but we are routinely above average. Doesn't mean it can't snow. Snow does not mean cold in the 2000s, most of the time time it means just cold enough. 

I'd love to get a look at that report and research. Is that something you can post here? With all the time I spend in the woods it's important and I try to read up on it as often as I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...