Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 22nd-25th Winter Storm Potential


Thundersnow12
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentioned earlier about the limited diurnal temp swings.  The 18z GFS is downright preposterous in that regard.  Verbatim on the 2m temp plots, it has ORD between 30-35 degrees for 162 consecutive hours during/after the storm.  That seems almost impossible to keep temps in that tight of a range for that long. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some nice hits in there.  Just have to factor in a melting/compaction element which means that depths probably won't be as high as what falls.
I find it interesting that the GEFS has consistently been hitting this harder than the operational GFS. Perhaps different physics packages helps explain, but also, in an inherently complex and odd setup like this, the higher vertical resolution of the op vs the ensembles might be of detriment. The lower vertical resolution of the ensemble can help smooth out features as opposed to what at times can be garbage in garbage out with the operational models. We haven't really seen this behavior with the ECMWF suite for this potential event but it can be an issue at times. My inclination now would be to lean toward the GEFS and ECMWF suite since those have been more consistent. Outer ranges of NAM have pointed more toward the latter.

As things stand right now, this doesn't look like an exciting event (aside from a interesting analog mentioned in previous posts), but with such a long duration, could add up to respectable totals on colder surfaces if things break right. In a mild hemispheric pattern, I'd take that as a win. Since I like to think of local events that may have some similarities, off the top of my head came up with January 14-15, 2018. That was a long duration 3-6" snow due to a slow moving ULL, though it was much colder aloft. Parts of DeKalb, Kane, and DuPage had a jackpot zone of 6-7". https://www.weather.gov/lot/2018Jan15_snowfall

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Mentioned earlier about the limited diurnal temp swings.  The 18z GFS is downright preposterous in that regard.  Verbatim on the 2m temp plots, it has ORD between 30-35 degrees for 162 consecutive hours during/after the storm.  That seems almost impossible to keep temps in that tight of a range for that long. 

Feel like that happens in late summer when we stay 65-70 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

I find it interesting that the GEFS has consistently been hitting this harder than the operational GFS. Perhaps different physics packages helps explain, but also, in an inherently complex and odd setup like this, the higher vertical resolution of the op vs the ensembles might be of detriment. The lower vertical resolution of the ensemble can help smooth out features as opposed to what at times can be garbage in garbage out with the operational models. We haven't really seen this behavior with the ECMWF suite for this potential event but it can be an issue at times. My inclination now would be to lean toward the GEFS and ECMWF suite since those have been more consistent. Outer ranges of NAM have pointed more toward the latter.

As things stand right now, this doesn't look like an exciting event (aside from a interesting analog mentioned in previous posts), but with such a long duration, could add up to respectable totals on colder surfaces if things break right. In a mild hemispheric pattern, I'd take that as a win. Since I like to think of local events that may have some similarities, off the top of my head came up with January 14-15, 2018. That was a long duration 3-6" snow due to a slow moving ULL, though it was much colder aloft. Parts of DeKalb, Kane, and DuPage had a jackpot zone of 6-7". https://www.weather.gov/lot/2018Jan15_snowfall

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I remember that storm and almost was dead center of the bullseye in Kane County. I was working from home that day and the snow just kept coming. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, snowstormcanuck said:

Quintessential thread the needle event.  Want to be right over/100 miles NW of H5 low track, wherever that ends up being.


Reading the NE subforum, this upcoming event has similarities to the December 10-11, 1992 storm. That storm gave Toronto around 12” of heavy wet snow (more fell points east). Temperatures throughout the storm hovered around 32-33F.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toronto4 said:

It would take a miracle for that scenario to happen. So many moving parts and everything would have to line up perfectly. Best case scenario would a modest event of 2-4” of wet snow.

Well, best case scenario might be that December 1992 event, but it's tremendously unlikely.  2-4" of plaster more likely than that, but still improbable.  EURO is almost a whiff to the south even though it's an outlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nashville native here. Considering a chase to Springfield Friday. For some of you, I get why this is laughable...but where we are, there’s a pretty good chance we get shut out snow-wise this winter. I’m a winter fanatic so I don’t mind the driving if it leads to something. 2-4” for where I’m from is a big deal. Would help to get local input/insight. Who knows...this threat may evaporate in 24-36 making this post a moot point. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...