Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 2020 Mid/Long Term Discussion


nj2va
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

Like everything about it screams classic I95 snowstorm and it’s rain to Scranton. I guess maybe that primary low starts too far N and erodes the mid levels before the coastal, but damn. 

I thought we had a coastal that looked like this in late January 2017 with a very similar setup that did indeed end up being all rain. I may have the year wrong though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PrinceFrederickWx said:

I thought we had a coastal that looked like this in late January 2017 with a very similar setup that did indeed end up being all rain. I may have the year wrong though.

I forget what recent year it was, it may have been 2017 come to think of it , definitely one of the last 6 or 7 winters.  The tracks were almost ideal , favoring snow, but the cold air was stale and the confluence never held. Not sure what the cause(s) were, but it lasted  a good part of  the winter.  There were even issues far to the NE as well .  .

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PrinceFrederickWx said:
13 minutes ago, frd said:

I forget what recent year it was, it may have been 2017 come to think of it , definitely one of the last 6 or 7 winters.  The tracks were almost ideal , favoring snow, but the cold air was stale and the confluence never held. Not sure what the cause(s) were, but it lasted  a good part of  the winter.  There were even issues far to the NE as well into New England as well.  

 

 

 

I thought we had a coastal that looked like this in late January 2017 with a very similar setup that did indeed end up being all rain. I may have the year wrong though.

Monday January 23, 2017.

It was the one year anniversary of the 2016 blizzard and there was moderate to heavy rain with fairly strong winds through the first half of the day. Far NW areas changed over to frozen (mainly sleet iirc) and got some minor accumulations.

And also, yeah, I remember a NWS disco out of ME or New England with very "irritated sounding" wording about it being late January that year yet not being able to get much in the way of any snow.

 

ETA: Could have sworn I was in banter... sorry about that.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eps isn’t there yet but trending the right way. Remember the Hudson Bay ridge look I posted wrt the 50/50. This is the h5 run to run change leading into the day 10 threat.

5FB78856-494F-4E4D-B8EC-20EC41CF3274.thumb.png.009e273398ab5769d00ee6e0a5c430b4.png

This is exactly the trend we need. Lower the heights to our northeast and this becomes a classic snow look. 

After that the eps opens the door that the day 10 storm becomes a 50/50 for a threat later. Lots of possibilities with the current pattern progs.  

GEPS looked good day 10-15 also. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This look here day 13 actually fits the profile of our “positive AO big snowstorms”. Obviously we want a -AO. But when we scored snow with a +AO it was often in a look like this...

9B75827E-1F23-4D34-8B69-BDF2D221793D.thumb.png.2381db7a2a7743bcd0e9a11aa36c2e33.png

Whatever happens with the day 10 threat the eps thinks that system migrated through the 50/50 region knocking down the ridge to our northeast. The fate of the day 10 seems to rest on the ability of some discreet wave before that to amplify just enough to knock down heights there ahead of the day 10 storm. A murkier proposition in the spread. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

The fate of the day 10 seems to rest on the ability of some discreet wave before that to amplify just enough to knock down heights there ahead of the day 10 storm. A murkier proposition in the spread. 

Is this the area , ( the Southern reaches of the area ) that is prone to Atlantic wave breaking and deepening storm systems?

If so, maybe the EPS has the correct idea and progression. 

Seems it has to amplify just enough, as you mentioned.  Not too much or another outcome ?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

No one is perfect, and I hardly ever post cranky's stuff , but we will see.

Sounds to me he is expecting some re-alignment in the NH with the weather features,  and then some sort of winter pattern emerging, aka. deep winter. Hmm 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HighStakes said:

GFS is a tiny bit more chilly than the Euro for next weeks temps. Lol.

Euro depiction of slightly above normal temps between day 7-12 is reasonable given its stale cold air trapped under a ridge.  But we can snow in that profile...especially if we can fix the ridge issue to our northeast allowing the mid levels to torch ahead of the wave.  It's cooling again day 15 either way.  GFS is too cold in the long range...we know that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ji said:

Euro has a big high in a great place but still rain

ecmwf_mslpa_us_11.png

The issue imo is still the west coast. No ridging per above, and you get this washed out trough on east coast with great low placement. We need that high shown here but with the PNA pumped up a bit. Atlantic has been fairly cooperative. Damn PAC and PNA have not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, frd said:

Is this the area , ( the Southern reaches of the area ) that is prone to Atlantic wave breaking and deepening storm systems?

If so, maybe the EPS has the correct idea and progression. 

Seems it has to amplify just enough, as you mentioned.  Not too much or another outcome ?   

Last post for a while...have to get back to work

This is the issue with the progression...EPS day 10

1.thumb.png.1d0a2ccb2ea6b2bad7fec1ed1e98e374.png

The timing of the ensembles is a little slower than the op but this shows the issue.  The flow ahead of the trough is all out of the south.  That is torching the mid levels.  If we had some cold to work with in the mid's we could probably overcome the warmer surface temps...mix some cold down with a good track...but if we torch the mids and the surface...well its game over.  

So taking the 6z GFS that had snow as an example

2.thumb.png.1316ea873b34fe268fcbb67e9cb5a77a.png

This wasnt perfect...it was still messy, the ridge would be better centered west not east of the Hudson Bay, but that 50/50 makes it work.  Look at the flow now over us and to our northeast.  Cutting off the southerly flow from torching us ahead of the trough.  Plus it creates confluence to hold a high pressure in longer.  This lead to the snowy solution on this run.

The op euro though...3.thumb.png.2599810a941a6b1dab797bb53a2c1317.png

That same feature is displaced where it can't help us and so the southerly flow torches us ahead of the system and there is no confluence to our north.  It's close...but this isn't horseshoes or hand grenades.  

So how can we get to the look we need....

4.thumb.png.63376f0f1d85a58834ca34a4439005b5.png

So there the energy that will be the day 10 threat is coming onshore in the west.  We need to get one of those vorts numbered to amplify significantly and into the 50/50 spot.  What happens on the euro op, 1 amplifies but remains cut off from the NS flow so its too far south, 3 gets absorbed into the TPV lobe and up into Greenland...2 washes out completely and 4 does end up where we need it but doesn't amplify enough and is way too weak to do much good.  

Get 3 and 1 to phase and pull them up into the 50/50 domain and that works.  Get 2 and 4 to phase and amplify...get 4 to amplify by itself.  None of those solutions would do us any good for snow BEFORE the day 10 threat... the flow is way to suppressive,  could help give northern New England a light event...but any of those combo's would knock down the ridge to our northeast, create confluence and shunt the southerly flow ahead of the wave from destroying our thermal profile.  

Hope that explains what you were asking.  
Back to real life...

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Hope that explains what you were asking.  
Back to real life...

You must be a great teacher !

Well done, and thank you psu !  Love the numbered system :)  And yes, it certainly does help explain things. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, Feb = highest climo snow potential around these parts,  and maybe a more pronounced Nino response is on the way.  Get lucky with some fresh arctic air,  any maybe we enter a period of multiple threats during our best month. 

There was a recent post today over in the NYC forum about increasing AAM and how it can reduce the tendency for a - EPO / -NAO. However, Don S chimed and brought over some neat stats regarding that connection. @donsutherland1 also stated the post about increasing AAM doesn't accurately depict the relationship between AAM , the EPO and the Nino state.  You can check that post out yourself in the Jan discussion thread over on the NYC thread. Don always manages to find some cool weather statistics on just about every weather element, driver and indices.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been busy AF last few days and haven't really looked at anything in detail. @psuhoffman covered everything but I wanted to post something about the d10 window. Seems crazy that odds favor rain but they do for now so it is what it is. The 12z EPS qpf and snow meteos show just how low our odds are for now. This can change in a blink as it's far out there in time. Some of the rain solutions are surely ice but snowfall is meager considering near unanimous support for precip.

QPF

KKPkXpt.png

 

Snowfall

1bEMymj.png

 

This comparison will be something I'm watching closely this week. Especially after the 18z gfs showed a path to victory

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Been busy AF last few days and haven't really looked at anything in detail. @psuhoffman covered everything but I wanted to post something about the d10 window. Seems crazy that odds favor rain but they do for now so it is what it is. The 12z EPS qpf and snow meteos show just how low our odds are for now. This can change in a blink as it's far out there in time. Some of the rain solutions are surely ice but snowfall is meager considering near unanimous support for precip.

QPF

KKPkXpt.png

 

Snowfall

1bEMymj.png

 

This comparison will be something I'm watching closely this week. Especially after the 18z gfs showed a path to victory

As of now the eps favors the warmer solution. But it’s not a case where there may or may not be a storm. The storm is there just the eps favors too much ridging in front and torches the temps. But watch that change in a dime if a future run decides to phase the ocean storm next week with the NS and suddenly there is a 50/50. Or it suddenly decides the NS vort in Canada next week is going to bomb. So imo it’s one of these situations that looks bad and isn’t likely but could flip on a dime if just one thing breaks our way.  Ironically the gfs and euro flipped positions in the last 48 hours. 

Wrt the eps there was a huge spike in snow just southwest day 15. Looking at the members there were several “incoming” storms at day 15. Day 16 was going to be big. Lol 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...