Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Lake Effect 2019-20 Thread


sbnwx85
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, RogueWaves said:

Didn't the UP have a stretch of BN snowfall winters? Were you up there for them? 

There's been a lot actually the past several years, although my little corner here has not been under 200" a season since I've lived here.  One or two years it was close and the depth only peaked around 30" one year, think it was 2016-17.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, weatherbo said:

Nice pics.  I don't think I've ever seen you post a pic of a sunny day.  I know how you despise them.

Really enjoy the pics you and Will post, please guys keep posting them. It helps us snow starved trolls, a troll is what the Yooper's call us that live south of the bridge, remember what deep mid winter conditions are supposed to look like north of the 45th parallel. At our place at Higgins Lake which is about 30 miles south of the 45th parallel, we've had a decent amount of snow so far this season but we've had a lot of rain and warm weather in between the snows. Sounds like cooler weather "should" start kicking in latter this week into the weekend and hopefully that allow whatever snow that does fall stay around. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may finally see some more lake effect here in Indiana. Haven't seen much since the big event on Veterans Day. The models don't seem overly impressed 

From the last two IWX forecast discussions:

Quote

The bottom falls out Saturday night/Sunday as markedly colder air surges into the region. With open water on Lake MI and pronounced delta-T expect to see a prolonged period of Lake Effect Sunday through Tuesday.


Blended lake effect snow parameter woefully underdoing LES
potential in wake of cold northwest flow and upper teens lake/8H
thermal differentials beginning Saturday night and extending into
early next week. A more north/south axis with upstream
preconditioning could pose a long duration/significant LES event,
but must concede muted confidence given long range.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow more than halfway through winter and the LES thread is barely 2 pages still, very sad indeed.

It does look like we may have a true LES outbreak beginning Sat Night and lasting through early next week. MLK riders will be happy im sure as we already picked up 4-5 inches since last night , another 6-8"+ from the system Fri-Sat then another 8-12" easy with LES definitely the best it has been all year and likely though remainder of winter. Have about 16-18" OTG now , should hit season high for depth by Tuesday.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of the few cold, snowy, lake-effect days we’ve seen this winter. Light snow off and on with the sun filtered through high clouds. Not really sticking though. Watching a band of snow to the north. If it holds together as it drops south we could get a quick inch or two. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will, those are beautiful pics.  Really captures that mid-winter feel.  It was def a beautiful day up here with the sunshine and a high of 20 at my house...  had to dig the chimney out.  

  I watched a video from the Tamarack location near Calumet and the snow depth was 54 inches, with a seasonal snow total of 204".  Probably one of the snowiest spots in the UP this winter to date.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure where to put this so it'll go here. A rather impressive industrial-enhanced snow band has developed south of Fort Wayne!

2h
 

A plume of industrial-enhanced snow has developed on the western side of Fort Wayne, IN. Watch for localized higher snowfall rates and lowered visibility in that area. The associated graphic shows how this process works.

EOwDL3iUcAAQn1o?format=jpg&name=large

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weatherbo said:

Will, those are beautiful pics.  Really captures that mid-winter feel.  It was def a beautiful day up here with the sunshine and a high of 20 at my house...  had to dig the chimney out.  

  I watched a video from the Tamarack location near Calumet and the snow depth was 54 inches, with a seasonal snow total of 204".  Probably one of the snowiest spots in the UP this winter to date.

I'm around 100" on the year about average surprisingly given the lack of any decent LES outbreaks yet, been a lot of 3-5" events. Many areas are below or barely at normal for the year. UP looking pretty good so far, those cutters earlier in the year really aided many areas.

snowdepth.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, josh_4184 said:

I'm around 100" on the year about average surprisingly given the lack of any decent LES outbreaks yet, been a lot of 3-5" events. Many areas are below or barely at normal for the year. UP looking pretty good so far, those cutters earlier in the year really aided many areas.

snowdepth.png

Those depths for the UP seem off. MQT in negaunee was reporting 37” yesterday morning and Grand Marais I believe has 41” OTG and I’m in excess of 40” here, so idk.

Some others further west:

Painsdale 51"

Kearsarge 46"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said:

Agw is a bitch

Can't help yourself, huh? 

Wouldn't be that concerned about cc and lake effect snow for now.  Some of the modeling actually suggests amounts could increase for a while (this has already happened in the past several decades) as the lakes being warmer/ice free for longer helps to counteract warmer airmasses in the means.  But you still do need to meet a minimum threshold to trigger les and the pattern hasn't just been a little warmer than avg, it has been very mild in the means for the past couple months.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Can't help yourself, huh? 

Wouldn't be that concerned about cc and lake effect snow for now.  Some of the modeling actually suggests amounts could increase for a while (this has already happened in the past several decades) as the lakes being warmer/ice free for longer helps to counteract warmer airmasses in the means.  But you still do need to meet a minimum threshold to trigger les and the pattern hasn't just been a little warmer than avg, it has been very mild in the means for the past couple months.  

Snowfall is absolutely increasing in the Great Lakes.  Detroit just finished its snowiest decade on record, and without all the numbers in front of me I imagine most of the Lake belts did as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

Snowfall is absolutely increasing in the Great Lakes.  Detroit just finished its snowiest decade on record, and without all the numbers in front of me I imagine most of the Lake belts did as well.  

I would be interested to see how the lake belts are doing if it were broke down by decade. To me it seems like the belts in northern lower MI had more snow back in the 90's but that's just me thinking back with nothing to base that off of other then snowmobiling up there since the mid 80's and always trying to find the deepest snow to play in when we could. The UP MI belts seem like they haven't changed much over the years to me, they pretty much always have great snow in the areas I have been going to for the past 30+ years. The SW MI belts seem like they have seen a decline to me, growing up my best friend had family in Paw Paw that we would go visit often and I remember them having crazy deep snow a lot of the time when back here in SE MI we would have very little. Now it seems like they don't get all that much more then what we get out this way. A big question I would ask is have the measuring techniques of the snow changed over the years at all and could that have a effect on the overall increases in the long term averages? Like measuring 2x a day verse 1x or certain times of the day type thing. I have no idea how "official" measuring is done but have wondered if the techniques have changed at all over the years could that have any effect on the long term averages? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, slow poke said:

I would be interested to see how the lake belts are doing if it were broke down by decade. To me it seems like the belts in northern lower MI had more snow back in the 90's but that's just me thinking back with nothing to base that off of other then snowmobiling up there since the mid 80's and always trying to find the deepest snow to play in when we could. The UP MI belts seem like they haven't changed much over the years to me, they pretty much always have great snow in the areas I have been going to for the past 30+ years. The SW MI belts seem like they have seen a decline to me, growing up my best friend had family in Paw Paw that we would go visit often and I remember them having crazy deep snow a lot of the time when back here in SE MI we would have very little. Now it seems like they don't get all that much more then what we get out this way. A big question I would ask is have the measuring techniques of the snow changed over the years at all and could that have a effect on the overall increases in the long term averages? Like measuring 2x a day verse 1x or certain times of the day type thing. I have no idea how "official" measuring is done but have wondered if the techniques have changed at all over the years could that have any effect on the long term averages? 

It would be a lot of work to get all the data, too bad we dont have climo experts in the area. As far as measurment techniques, i remember years ago i asked a local met about the every 6 hours method and he stated that its been in place as long as he can remember (1960s) but for first order stations the practice has been in place as long as is remembered. However If a lake belt location only measured once a day that would definitely show up as less, as so much of their snow is super fluffy. So what you would need to do is look at a first order station.  Coops will have more errors and variance. Another way to do it is to look at daily snow depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...