Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

A little pre-season thread: Can Nov. 8 pull off an early win?


moneypitmike
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Oh I know...so were the 10 to 1 clown maps from earl barker's page in 2007....but we used to post them because it was fun to assume the model QPF would pan out and all of it would be 10 to 1 snow. This is a pretty extreme solution from a dynamic standpoint, so there would definitely be huge totals if the run actually verified. But clown maps just mesmerize the weenie community more into believing it will happen...that's what I always found funny about them. Like if we post snowfall maps, it somehow starts to make it feel more real.

I really wish they would be eliminated. The code which is utilized to run them should be destroyed and the world needs to be brainwashed by the men in black pen to believe they never existed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Oh is that case now...   Yeah take your word for it - I just remember discussion over the years related to that model over doing warmth on cold sides of cyclones.  Perhaps that's different now. 

It's on the emc page. It throws mid level warmth too far north of a sfc low so it over mixes but if anything it has a cold bias at the surface. That snow map from the gdps showed southern areas suffering from a torched bl not from too much ip/zr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said:

Kuch does okay in marginal airmasses (it will shower lower than (10:1) and mid level magic areas but otherwise isn't super helpful. 

Yeah it's decent when there are some warm layers involved....either at ground or especially aloft. It will punish values over freezing....though it can struggle if the models are biasing too warm near the ground in a paste bomb situation (ala models think ORH will be 34F and snow when in reality it's gonna pound at 31F)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OSUmetstud said:

It's on the emc page. It throws mid level warmth too far north of a sfc low so it over mixes but if anything it has a cold bias at the surface. That snow map from the gdps showed southern areas suffering from a torched bl not from too much ip/zr. 

Well, in any case, it's p-type distribution looks unbalanced to me given the general synoptic appeal ( 12z run ); it's extending the liquid too far N into bl resistance in interior zones down here...  But, admittedly, some of that is based upon experience with flat waves running underneath nascent ( relatively new ...) polar air masses, as expecting hygroscopic feedback.   However it is we get there... imho if the QPF layout took place, my hunch is the rain/snow line is compressed farther south.  

'Course, getting the run to verify the other features is entirely a different task -  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah it's decent when there are some warm layers involved....either at ground or especially aloft. It will punish values over freezing....though it can struggle if the models are biasing too warm near the ground in a paste bomb situation (ala models think ORH will be 34F and snow when in reality it's gonna pound at 31F)

How likely is it the Euro is in usual overamped bias? Possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

He knew what he was doing.... shouting from the alter “rain for everyone” turns into that Euro run.

Jeeze I said that about an hr ago and already being taken out of context? Never said rain for everyone, especially not you. This euro run only strengthened my case, further reflecting the trend west/north. How many more runs before euro 850 mb track is over Pittsfield MA? 8? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said:

How likely is it the Euro is in usual overamped bias? Possible?

I mean...yeah its possible. This was a pretty extreme solution. But even if the solution is weak, we can still get mostly rain if the frontal boundary hasn't pressed far enough south ala the GFS OP run today.

We're really rooting for that scooter streak to hold strong on subsequent runs to get more SNE snow. Most should be happy to just get first measurable....that's the bar I"m setting anyway. If it trends colder/more favorable, then we can start thinking more aggressively.

 

Hope the EPS verifies...just came out and it looks really good for interior SNE into CNE. I think most should know all the caveats when we're in the 90-96 hour range.

 

Nov4_12zEPS96.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I think I am one of the nicer lower elevation spots in sne for this one...

Agreed...I pick Chris' location first in Greenfield for low elevation spot in this storm as the best, but you're area is a close second.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Jeeze I said that about an hr ago and already being taken out of context? Never said rain for everyone, especially not you. This euro run only strengthened my case, further reflecting the trend west/north. How many more runs before euro 850 mb track is over Pittsfield MA? 8? 

Sorry man, we are all just joking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I mean...yeah its possible. This was a pretty extreme solution. But even if the solution is weak, we can still get mostly rain if the frontal boundary hasn't pressed far enough south ala the GFS OP run today.

We're really rooting for that scooter streak to hold strong on subsequent runs to get more SNE snow. Most should be happy to just get first measurable....that's the bar I"m setting anyway. If it trends colder/more favorable, then we can start thinking more aggressively.

 

Hope the EPS verifies...just came out and it looks really good for interior SNE into CNE. I think most should know all the caveats when we're in the 90-96 hour range.

 

Nov4_12zEPS96.png

Rev interpreted that as 

“lock up 6+”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...