Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

October 2019 General Discussions & Observations Thread


Rtd208
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, bluewave said:

This has to be one of the more convective systems that we have seen this time of year. Check out the big convective blob low pressure jumps of the last 2 NAM runs. Next several runs should be interesting.
 

C04AA9B7-5456-4FFC-872A-4E50AEFD6120.thumb.png.98bf6ccc198d9ccc2aa70e783fc791fb.png



C73CD48E-1CEA-49F5-BB8B-527C4CC9D684.thumb.png.a85085a90c821af0f08b7cb48cdc1f5e.png

 

Will most of the heavy rain be occurring during the late night hours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The recent dry spell has led to New York City's precipitation having fallen below normal on a year-to-date basis. In addition, the implied probability of New York City's seeing 50" or more precipitation this year has decreased to 45%.

However, there is strong model consensus that the region will likely experience its biggest rainstorm in several months as a strong nor'easter moves across western Long Island into New England. Widespread 1"-2" rainfall amounts with local amounts in excess of 3" appears likely tomorrow into Thursday.

Below is a summary of the precipitation status for select cities:

Precip10152019.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bluewave said:

This has to be one of the more convective systems that we have seen this time of year. Check out the big convective blob low pressure jumps of the last 2 NAM runs. Next several runs should be interesting.

No doubt. I think convection (w/ or w/o lightning) will probably be the culprit for damaging winds, in addition to the potential sting jet. Both seem to favor LI and points east-northeast along the coast of southern New England. The Gulf Stream and anomalous warmth to its north likely will be factoring into the convective potential.

1442719470_ScreenShot2019-10-15at9_23_01AM.png.e80b38b44f3560f63b2275ddd2e9f39d.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

No doubt. I think convection (w/ or w/o lightning) will probably be the culprit for damaging winds, in addition to the potential sting jet. Both seem to favor LI and points east-northeast along the coast of southern New England. The Gulf Stream and anomalous warmth to its north likely will be factoring into the convective potential.

1442719470_ScreenShot2019-10-15at9_23_01AM.png.e80b38b44f3560f63b2275ddd2e9f39d.png

I was going to ask, do you think the contrast between the Gulf Stream and our own offshore waters will cause the highest winds just offshore?

It reminds me of a weaker version of the March 2010 noreaster that gave us hurricane force gusts on the south shore while the winds were much weaker on the north shore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

The recent dry spell has led to New York City's precipitation having fallen below normal on a year-to-date basis. In addition, the implied probability of New York City's seeing 50" or more precipitation this year has decreased to 45%.

However, there is strong model consensus that the region will likely experience its biggest rainstorm in several months as a strong nor'easter moves across western Long Island into New England. Widespread 1"-2" rainfall amounts with local amounts in excess of 3" appears likely tomorrow into Thursday.

Below is a summary of the precipitation status for select cities:

Precip10152019.jpg

The low is going to move across western LI, Don?  I thought the center was going to pass east of us, between Boston and Cape Cod?  Do you have a precip tally for JFK?  I think it's even less than Islip.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

I was going to ask, do you think the contrast between the Gulf Stream and our own offshore waters will cause the highest winds just offshore?

The highest winds will occur wherever the warm sector sets up (especially from 950-925mb). A shallow surface inversion is likely for most areas near the coast, but this can be overcome by convection based just above the surface.  Deeper inversions inland should prevent stronger winds there Wed PM but everyone will see W/NW wind gusts Thursday.

The SST anomalies will become more important later in the winter; the Gulf Stream positioned so close to a cold continent acts as a natural baroclinic zone for coastal storms. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LibertyBell said:

The low is going to move across western LI, Don?  I thought the center was going to pass east of us, between Boston and Cape Cod?  Do you have a precip tally for JFK?  I think it's even less than Islip.

 

One is dealing with dual centers. On the 0z ECMWF, between hours 48 and 51, a developing second center crosses western/central Long Island while another center is offshore. The second center rapidly intensifies and reaches just under 980 mb over Rhode Island and continues north-northeastward into eastern New Hampshire by 60 hours. The offshore center passes southeast of Nantucket and then into the Gulf of Maine from 54 hours to 60 hours.

JFK has received 39.07" precipitation, which is 4.89" above normal for this time of year.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

One is dealing with dual centers. On the 0z ECMWF, between hours 48 and 51, a developing second center crosses western/central Long Island while another center is offshore. The second center rapidly intensifies and reaches just under 980 mb over Rhode Island and continues north-northeastward into eastern New Hampshire by 60 hours. The offshore center passes southeast of Nantucket and then into the Gulf of Maine from 54 hours to 60 hours.

JFK has received 39.07" precipitation, which is 4.89" above normal for this time of year.

 

Don, do you think such a dual low structure may cause the further offshore low to rob the inner low of moisture and we may dry slot after a few hours of heavy rain?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LibertyBell said:

Chris, is that 972 low the primary or secondary low?

 

It eventually merges with the low just to the west and loops NW into SE New England. The system is so convective, that the models are still struggling with where the best convective blobs and low pressure forms. This one may come right down to the wire.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

Don, do you think such a dual low structure may cause the further offshore low to rob the inner low of moisture and we may dry slot after a few hours of heavy rain?

 

Not in this case. The closer low is forecast to rapidly deepen. In most cases, the offshore low is dominant and/or deepening, pulling the moisture offshore.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Not in this case. The closer low is forecast to rapidly deepen. In most cases, the offshore low is dominant and/or deepening, pulling the moisture offshore.

Wow, this sounds pretty rare- I dont remember something like this happening before.  Has it?  In every case I remember the offshore low takes over.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

The recent dry spell has led to New York City's precipitation having fallen below normal on a year-to-date basis. In addition, the implied probability of New York City's seeing 50" or more precipitation this year has decreased to 45%.

However, there is strong model consensus that the region will likely experience its biggest rainstorm in several months as a strong nor'easter moves across western Long Island into New England. Widespread 1"-2" rainfall amounts with local amounts in excess of 3" appears likely tomorrow into Thursday.

Below is a summary of the precipitation status for select cities:

Precip10152019.jpg

Similar to EWR  at my station with 46.05" YTD, which is about a +8" departure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...