Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,612
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

May 2019 Discussion


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

I turned to snow for a couple of hours before dawn.  Just enough to barely coat the grass.  Low was 32.4F.  Precip total .57".   Looking at the hills real accumulations started at 1500.  At 2000 trees were totally coated.  So I guess in this area models did pretty good once the backed of on the larger totals 2 days before the event.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, powderfreak said:

What does this even mean? 

He's saying that we should focus on weather that normal people like. 

The one problem with that is that normal people don't spend time discussing weather models or forecasts. The people who are interested in meteorology are mostly sick like us...they want snow, or severe weather, or epic flooding, etc...they don't want San Diego weather. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

He's saying that we should focus on weather that normal people like. 

The one problem with that is that normal people don't spend time discussing weather models or forecasts. The people who are interested in meteorology are mostly sick like us...they want snow, or severe weather, or epic flooding, etc...they don't want San Diego weather. 

Yeah I mean I commented on it but yesterday had probably the most traffic in the thread that you'll ever see in May, outside some high end severe outbreak, maybe?  Hell the fact that you are even posting is telling, there was something mildly interesting happening.  

There were like 35 people in here last night when a normal May sunny day its like 3 at a time.  This thread grew more in 3 days than it did the other 11 days of the month combined.  

You can't ignore it these things...if you want to make money, talk about exciting weather.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

He's saying that we should focus on weather that normal people like. 

The one problem with that is that normal people don't spend time discussing weather models or forecasts. The people who are interested in meteorology are mostly sick like us...they want snow, or severe weather, or epic flooding, etc...they don't want San Diego weather. 

Sort of... I mean, this site would do better in succeeding that enterprise if it had mass- appeal   ...   I'm not here to say "should" anything ... Folks should do what they want. 

I mean the snow in the elevation ... I find it to be not that unusual to be blunt.  Yeah it extended down in elevation below climo by a thou'  ... but, all this system's merit really was in my mind was another stolen period away from a warm month.  I disagree a little that meteorologist have to be sick - ... tongue in cheek or not, there is a bit of a concentration of one particular ilk of those tended to pre-occupation with one particular facet in this particular corner of social media... 

I for one have not heard much Meteorological discussion about the synoptic leading this, nor the wonder/awe of it how bad this is given the calendar ...  Evidentiary, the awareness and focus has been almost entirely lusting, with a coherent yet evasive 'hope' for seeing snow in one's backyard.  Sorry...that's not "meteorological" ... It might be a sickness, okay - but it's not very "sciency"

heh, whatever -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Sort of... I mean, this site would do better in succeeding that enterprise if it had mass- appeal   ...   I'm not here to say "should" anything ... Folks should do what they want. 

I mean the snow in the elevation ... I find it to be not that unusual to be blunt.  Yeah it extended down in elevation below climo by a thou'  ... but, all this system's merit really was in my mind was another stolen period away from a warm month.  I disagree a little that meteorologist have to be sick - ... tongue in cheek or not, there is a bit of a concentration of one particular ilk of those tended to pre-occupation with one particular facet in this particular corner of social media... 

I for one have not heard much Meteorological discussion about the synoptic leading this, nor the wonder/awe of it how bad this is given the calendar ...  Evidentiary, the awareness and focus has been almost entirely lusting, with a coherent yet evasive 'hope' for seeing snow in one's backyard.  Sorry...that's not "meteorological" ... It might be a sickness, okay - but it's not very "sciency"

heh, whatever -

I agree with this...this is what drives me nuts with social media (although to be fair that's not the point of social media...but I believe there are adverse impacts to the field). Everything nowadays is "cheap" forecasting...snow maps, QPF maps, more snow maps, and so forth. It would be great to just sit there and read detailed analysis of like 500mb and all the pieces potentially involved and how each feature can influence the outcome. That discussion still exists here but nothing compared to the degree it once was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

It would be great to just sit there and read detailed analysis of like 500mb and all the pieces potentially involved and how each feature can influence the outcome. That discussion still exists here but nothing compared to the degree it once was. 

No offense Wiz, but you are a degreed Met now.  Offer up some of that discussion you want to hear!  It was there at times, but there's only so many times you can say the ULL is over upstate NY and the energy is sneaking too far ahead of the trough and letting a bigger impact storm slip east and never letting good conveyor belts develop, etc.

It seems a little disingenuous to say the discussion has gone downhill while your giving stories about missing a hail storm because you were drinking while sitting in a hot tub on a Saturday afternoon or something.  You're a meteorologist (huge congrats still on reaching that goal), share that knowledge.  Those stories are hilarious and great and that's what makes this a community, though.  We wouldn't want everyone to take the personality out of the forums, most of us have known each other online for over a decade and have met a variety of people in person too.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, powderfreak said:

No offense Wiz, but you are a degreed Met now.  Offer up some of that discussion you want to hear!  It was there at times, but there's only so many times you can say the ULL is over upstate NY and the energy is sneaking too far ahead of the trough and letting a bigger impact storm slip east and never letting good conveyor belts develop, etc.

It seems a little disingenuous to say the discussion has gone downhill while your giving stories about missing a hail storm because you were drinking while sitting in a hot tub on a Saturday afternoon or something.  You're a meteorologist (huge congrats still on reaching that goal), share that knowledge.  Those stories are hilarious and great and that's what makes this a community, though.  We wouldn't want everyone to take the personality out of the forums, most of us have known each other online for over a decade and have met a variety of people in person too.  

It wasn't an entirely serious post haha. When need be the discussion is there. there is a good balance here of science and fun. Maybe sometimes the fun goes a bit overboard but so be it. As long as it's not driving people away or preventing folks from trying to add discussion there's no harm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

It wasn't an entirely serious post haha. When need be the discussion is there. there is a good balance here of science and fun. Maybe sometimes the fun goes a bit overboard but so be it. As long as it's not driving people away or preventing folks from trying to add discussion there's no harm. 

Haha yeah it's always evolving.  Smart phones really changed it IMO.  Shorter messages but more frequent posts.  Before you used to have to wait to get home, fire up the Compaq tower computer purchased at Circut City and type out a well thought out dissertation.  Now we just have a running dialog and it's harder to write a Tippy sized novel on an iPhone.  

I always find your stories hilariously comic in a way...like the most stoked severe weather dude ever stuck inside at an ice skating rink (of all places, a cold icy one) in July missing severe storms left and right.  You're a legend for that stuff ha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Sort of... I mean, this site would do better in succeeding that enterprise if it had mass- appeal   ...   I'm not here to say "should" anything ... Folks should do what they want. 

I mean the snow in the elevation ... I find it to be not that unusual to be blunt.  Yeah it extended down in elevation below climo by a thou'  ... but, all this system's merit really was in my mind was another stolen period away from a warm month.  I disagree a little that meteorologist have to be sick - ... tongue in cheek or not, there is a bit of a concentration of one particular ilk of those tended to pre-occupation with one particular facet in this particular corner of social media... 

I for one have not heard much Meteorological discussion about the synoptic leading this, nor the wonder/awe of it how bad this is given the calendar ...  Evidentiary, the awareness and focus has been almost entirely lusting, with a coherent yet evasive 'hope' for seeing snow in one's backyard.  Sorry...that's not "meteorological" ... It might be a sickness, okay - but it's not very "sciency"

heh, whatever -

Well to be fair...there's really not a lot of "synoptic" meteorology involved in a May snow event...at least in terms of larger scale pattern. Wavelengths are shortened to the point where we aren't looking at a teleconnection to hint at a May snow threat like we do in, say, February. I know you already know this....so what does that leave to discuss? Well, the smaller scale....we did discuss some of the smaller scale synoptic features like how the ULL was a bit too far northwest to really drive a stronger conveyor....that's how we get something bigger like a May '77. This one just couldn't dig down enough to prodce something more significant.

 

While a few flakes in May down to 600 or 800 feet in May isn't historic, it's definitely pretty rare. My guess is we'd have quite a bit of discussion in here too if we were looking to push mid 90s on a heat ridge...granted, probably not quite as much as the snow slop threat, but still a lot more than typical May weather. This one probably had a bit more discussion too because some of the model guidance leading into it was a bit more threatening. If the same result had happened except it was the other way around....models showing little threat of snow at all, and then a few folks did get some flakes...the discussion would have been a lot more muted due to lack of anticipation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, powderfreak said:

Haha yeah it's always evolving.  Smart phones really changed it IMO.  Shorter messages but more frequent posts.  Before you used to have to wait to get home, fire up the Compaq tower computer purchased at Circut City and type out a well thought out dissertation.  Now we just have a running dialog and it's harder to write a Tippy sized novel on an iPhone.  

I always find your stories hilariously comic in a way...like the most stoked severe weather dude ever stuck inside at an ice skating rink (of all places, a cold icy one) in July missing severe storms left and right.  You're a legend for that stuff ha. 

Phone has completely changed everything...it's pretty wild. Heck...even with sports. I used to find myself doing whatever I could to never miss a game (Red Sox, Pats, Bruins, Celtics) but now it's not that big of a deal...granted too I'm not in high school anymore and have responsibilities lol. 

But there is only so much you can do on an analysis level before you just beat it to death. What makes this place so great is the unique combination of everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...