Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Midweek event, Yah or Nah? February 27-28th Clipper


USCAPEWEATHERAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Given H7 RH, I wouldn’t be a QPF queen in the rt2 to SNH area. 

I really hope I don't have our 1st snow day... Thursday is my final day of my ski club. If we lose it, we have to do it next week... plus it would push me to June 14...One more and it is into the next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

I really hope I don't have our 1st snow day... Thursday is my final day of my ski club. If we lose it, we have to do it next week... plus it would push me to June 14...One more and it is into the next week

You want snow....you take it when you can get it...That's It!!  Enjoy whatever comes.  Maybe just a nice delay???  We only have one snow day here so far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kitzbuhel Craver said:

Last time I checked the forum before work peeps were thinking 2-4, 3-6 for CT. Should have known with this winter it would turn to trash. Guess I’ll be happy with my T-1. My god. what in the actual hell?

Ryan was just on and feels 2-4 statewide is a good call right now.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

Bufkit soundings look pretty horrific down this way and I'm not a big fan of a NW llvl flow. Tons of dry air within the SGZ...not a whole lot of showing of RH with respect to ice > 100% and RH is generally under 90%...not good. Should be some subsidence sucking somewhere. 

1448818695_022719CTsnowmap.png.63b4a4bde05dce4ac90e0a19e1e198f2.png

Take em up 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Wiz looking for RH's w/ respect to ice of over 100%?

 

edit....n/m. I misinterpreted what he was getting at. I was thinking he was looking for RH above 100% in order for it to be saturated with respect to ice when in reality it'd be much lower than 90%.

 

Anyway, I think you're worrying too much here Paul. You're starting off with plenty of saturation in the column up to H55 on the NAM. It's a decently deep DGZ aloft as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...