Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 19-21, 2019 storm threat


Danajames

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 818
  • Created
  • Last Reply

As usual it’s a bit hard to decipher, but I think HM’s tweet here relates to what the GFS might be hinting at. 

 if you’re in the band, you’re busting high with good ratios and dynamics.  GFS wants to put it in north-central VA, NAM has it between DC and the M/D. If you’re not, it’s gonna be weak sauce with sh*tty ratios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As some have mentioned, the band(s) of stronger rates of snow won’t be fully known until gametime... so not surprised the models, like the GFS, continue to move around a bit and place heavier areas of snow at different places. That’s why they are used as guidance, but not gospel. GFS still produced good snows for Wednesday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ji said:

Gfs is worst model for cad....its not useful once we get into high res range

The GFS is just killing the shortwave that triggers the WAA earlier.  The NAM/ICON do it too but much later.  The GFS is also not as strong with the SER so the disturbance tracks more south.  I would trust the NAM/ICON more for your area right now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...