Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,911
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ianlian7
    Newest Member
    Ianlian7
    Joined

Feb 18 overrunning threat


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 849
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 2/16/2019 at 8:42 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

I think they could be given the northeasterly winds at the surface

Expand  

Northeast surface winds aren't going to matter a whole lot, you want to saturate 700 mb or so, and that's a westerly flow. So we need models to be wrong to our west.

There is that first wave Sunday night that more or less is an equal opportunity light snow, but by Monday morning all the RH is north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 8:44 PM, OceanStWx said:

Northeast surface winds aren't going to matter a whole lot, you want to saturate 700 mb or so, and that's a westerly flow. So we need models to be wrong to our west.

There is that first wave Sunday night that more or less is an equal opportunity light snow, but by Monday morning all the RH is north.

Expand  

Yeah agree. The cloud physics aren’t very impressive as modeled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 8:44 PM, OceanStWx said:

Northeast surface winds aren't going to matter a whole lot, you want to saturate 700 mb or so, and that's a westerly flow. So we need models to be wrong to our west.

There is that first wave Sunday night that more or less is an equal opportunity light snow, but by Monday morning all the RH is north.

Expand  

Why this has no semblance to the firehouse analog. There is no prolonged easterly fetch at any level.

Also, the mechanics, whether overrunning / CCB / IVT event are not solid and long-lasting... the mesos look more spotty and showery but the hope is it will add up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 8:56 PM, OceanStWx said:

I'm not sure there is the confidence in 6+ to with a watch.

Expand  

Oh ok, even though every model brings those amounts close if not to that amount for Cape Cod?  With a strengthening/redeveloping secondary low south of Long Island, NY I would think Cape and Islands would be favored for the heaviest snow amounts like past storms given NE ocean enhancement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 9:00 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

Oh ok, even though every model brings those amounts close if not to that amount for Cape Cod?  With a strengthening/redeveloping secondary low south of Long Island, NY I would think Cape and Islands would be favored for the heaviest snow amounts like past storms given NE ocean enhancement.

Expand  

You'll be flirting with sleet, poor snow growth, and dry air in the DGZ. Not a lot of confidence in a watch yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 9:00 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

Oh ok, even though every model brings those amounts close if not to that amount for Cape Cod?  With a strengthening/redeveloping secondary low south of Long Island, NY I would think Cape and Islands would be favored for the heaviest snow amounts like past storms given NE ocean enhancement.

Expand  

Beware of 2 things:

1.  Taint

2.  Proximity to dry slotting

Good luck 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 9:00 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

Oh ok, even though every model brings those amounts close if not to that amount for Cape Cod?  With a strengthening/redeveloping secondary low south of Long Island, NY I would think Cape and Islands would be favored for the heaviest snow amounts like past storms given NE ocean enhancement.

Expand  

Your making assumptions based on QPF output and snow ratios that are likely not 100% accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 9:03 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:
Expand  

Where are you getting the Cape and islands a mix?  No model shows that the 18z NAM went colder for the area, back to all snow.  Not even the CMC shows rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ACK deals with the taint, not CHH and the Cape Cod area.  All models show the mix line only reaching ACK, that is 25 miles to the south.  The storm intensifies rapidly to the south of LI, and sustains cold air over the region.  NAM/GFS/CMC/3 km NAM/EURO/EURO means all show accumulating snow over 4" for the Cape and Islands, no changeover, only guidance to show a mix is the SREFs mean and we all know how accurate that is.  Again lift is strong to intense in the DGZ over CHH according to the Coolwx.com maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/16/2019 at 9:07 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

ACK deals with the taint, not CHH and the Cape Cod area.  All models show the mix line only reaching ACK, that is 25 miles to the south.  The storm intensifies rapidly to the south of LI, and sustains cold air over the region.  NAM/GFS/CMC/3 km NAM/EURO/EURO means all show accumulating snow over 4" for the Cape and Islands, no changeover, only guidance to show a mix is the SREFs mean and we all know how accurate that is.  Again lift is strong to intense in the DGZ over CHH according to the Coolwx.com maps.

Expand  

I thought the SREFs were good for trends?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...