AppsRunner Posted February 10, 2019 Author Share Posted February 10, 2019 Pretty good agreement between the UKMET/GEM/ECM across Iowa into E MN/W WI with a swath of 0.5-1.25" of QPF stretching from southwest Iowa up to La Crosse or so. Seems if any storm is going to be the big one of the season for DSM/LSE it'd be this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 18z NAM looks like it will up the ice potential. Warmer aloft in more of northern IL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 18Z NAM thru 66 10:1 ratio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 2 hours ago, snowstormcanuck said: Right now I'd go with 4-8" for mby, given the fact we'll probably go over to some sort of mixture. GEM and EURO though basically lock us in as snow beginning to end, but not ready to buy that yet. Regardless, have to admit that this is one of the better snow seasons we've had this decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 LOT UPDATE Monday night: A combo of WAA, the approaching mid-level trough, and the left-exit of an upper jet should allow for a widespread swath of moderate precip to shift NE across the CWA during the night. The increased low-level WAA should push the surface freezing line to along the I-80 corridor, thus ending the threat of freezing rain south. Between the I-80 and I-88 corridors, including Chicago, the dominate precip type looks to be freezing rain, whereas precip should remain snow generally north of I-88. Given thermo profiles only slightly below freezing below 700 hPa to the north, expectation is for any snow to be fairly wet, with potentially <10:1 SLRs. Lastly, east winds may gust as high as 30 mph through the night across the north half of the CWA. Tuesday: The surface low will track NE across the southern CWA into NW Indiana during the morning. CAA will ensure, changing rain to snow from NW to SE across the CWA through the day. Snow accumulations during the day will range from 1-2" north to around a half inch south. Meanwhile, NW winds will quickly increase with gusts to 35 mph by sunset Tuesday across much of the area. Given the wet snow potential, blowing snow does not appear to be a significant issue at this time. Headlines: First, have decided to hold off on any Winter Storm Watches at this time. Had considered one for the northern tier of counties plus Ogle county. Warning criteria of 6"/12hr or 8"/24hr will likely not be met given the low snow ratios. However, impacts from the very wet snow may ultimately justify the need for a warning if guidance continues to indicate higher QPF over 0.5". However, confidence is quite high that solid advisory-level snow will be met across the northern tier of counties Monday evening into Tuesday afternoon, especially given the potential of rather wet snow. Farther south, confidence on ice amounts is low to medium. This results in a conundrum of whether or not to issue an advisory for lower-confidence icing that starts earlier than higher confidence advisory-level snow that starts later to the north. Ultimately decided to issue an advisory across the northern two tiers of counties. While confidence is medium for icing across the Chicago metro and west, a potentially colder solution of more snow than ice would still warrant an advisory for moderate wet snow instead. In other words, while precip type (snow vs. freezing rain) remains unclear, there will likely be impacts either way. Farther south along the I-80 corridor, there are some concerns that slightly higher surface temps may significantly reduce icing amounts, so have opted to not issue an advisory there at this time, but a colder solution require an expansion to the south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman1952 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Winter Storm Watch for me now has been issued for late Monday through Wednesday. People with kids are already sick and tired of most or all of last week having no school.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillsdaleMIWeather Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 18Z GFS is a touch north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Right now I’m thinking 1-6” snow/sleet spread across the area, lower towards I-80 and highest near IL/WI border.Then probably an axis of 0.10-0.25” ice accrual across the heart of the LOT CWA as well.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 11 minutes ago, HillsdaleMIWeather said: 18Z GFS is a touch north looks snowier in these parts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Models still aren't giving much clarification for this area, as p-type and amounts still vary quite a bit. Euro also very slow to get precip in here compared to other models, and also more meager on QPF. First guess is a messy mixture throughout, with mixing p-types cutting down on anything too significant for a single p-type. I'd much rather be sitting up in the nw DVN cwa where they have a good shot to receive mostly snow. Should be a nice snow for CR crew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mississaugasnow Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Ottawa Blizzard said: Regardless, have to admit that this is one of the better snow seasons we've had this decade. This storm has high bust potential for forecasters. The exact time of changeover, where the dry slot ends up and where exactly the low tracks will be big for the GTHA. My first call would be for a solid 6-10" event north of the 401 followed by freezing rain/ice pellets and then dry slotted. I dont think rain makes it that far north. South of the 401 (Burlington-Toronto) I think 5-8" with freezing rain and ice pellets maybe a brief change over to rain before dry slotted Hamilton-Niagara 3-5" with several hours of ice pellets/freezing rain followed by a few hours of rain followed by dry slot. I think someone in Central/Eastern Ontario ends up with 20" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherbo Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary67 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, weatherbo said: Not a good look for Chicago area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 7 minutes ago, Cary67 said: Not a good look for Chicago area. it's exactly what the forecast is. 1" south with Freezing rain to 6" up your way. Looks fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 16 minutes ago, weatherbo said: This map has looked the same for every event the past 15 days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malacka11 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, mimillman said: This map has looked the same for every event the past 15 days Hopefully our luck changes with the next event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary67 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, mimillman said: This map has looked the same for every event the past 15 6 minutes ago, Baum said: it's exactly what the forecast is. 1" south with Freezing rain to 6" up your way. Looks fine. Hope so but 18Z NAM looks to push more FZR up to the state line with a bit of a dry slot followed by a deformation axis just south of Chicago. Seems like were in a position of high bust potential at least snow wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Decent fluff event here tonight, looks like a solid 2-3" has fallen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogueWaves Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, Stebo said: Decent fluff event here tonight, looks like a solid 2-3" has fallen. You must've gotten the more dynamic weenie band. Just 0.7" of dense pixie stuff back here. At least it's white again.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Perry Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 hour ago, mimillman said: This map has looked the same for every event the past 15 days Was just going to say that haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Looks like the jump north the 18z NAM took was an aberration. Back SE so far on the 0z run, through 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllinoisWedges Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Both the 0z 12km NAM and 0z HRRR are pretty bigly on ice in the LOT area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoalCityWxMan Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 18 minutes ago, IllinoisWedges said: Both the 0z 12km NAM and 0z HRRR are pretty bigly on ice in the LOT area. 2 ice storms in 7 days but I will say I think this one has the potential to be worse, with the last storm being a shorter duration/heavier precipitation event limiting accretion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, CoalCityWxMan said: 2 ice storms in 7 days but I will say I think this one has the potential to be worse, with the last storm being a shorter duration/heavier precipitation event limiting accrediting And even then, DKB got over .2” of accretion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 ouch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 COD map hope its wrong with ice amounts around and just west of downtown Chicago . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Likely would be a band of over .25" accretion if the NAMs are right. The bigger problem will come if there is an overlap area that gets significant ice and doesn't melt it before the winds kick in on Tuesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary67 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 0Z 3K NAM showing ice/sleet vs snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 May be of minor importance but the tree branches have a head start with building up snow/ice given the minor snow earlier and been getting freezing drizzle up until a short time ago when it flipped back to snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Perry Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 37 minutes ago, Hoosier said: Likely would be a band of over .25" accretion if the NAMs are right. The bigger problem will come if there is an overlap area that gets significant ice and doesn't melt it before the winds kick in on Tuesday. Agreed. Temps aren’t looking like they’ll get AOA freezing for too long by much of the guidance - and a lot of the precip falling will be a lighter nature over a longer period of time. Between that and temps being in the mid to upper 20’s for you all the way this way, I’m growing increasingly concerned for the potential of some serious impacts from this system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.