Syrmax Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 minute ago, rochesterdave said: 21” being reported near Hamilton Ontario. Lake effect Sounds like the drinking started early there. WTF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lakeeffectkid383 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 8pm 6.6" here. Really starting to crank up now. Lot more wind too. It's getting nasty out now! Only negative is flakes are are back to that sugary/glittery tiny flakes again like they were this morning. Temp down to 15.9 degrees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Syrmax said: Sounds like the drinking started early there. WTF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rochesterdave Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Just now, BuffaloWeather said: I knew youd be interested in that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrmax Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 It’s looking torchy to South and East. At least the major ice storm concerns should be allayed. Already entire state of NJ at or above 32 along with A lot of CT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lakeeffectkid383 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 minute ago, BuffaloWeather said: There isn't a snowballs chance in hell there was 21" from that, unless it's been sitting there for 4 days under the radar beam LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY_WX Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Are you sure that’s not 21cm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Probally cm. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96blizz Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Awesome sauce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96blizz Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, rochesterdave said: 21” being reported near Hamilton Ontario. Lake effect Where you get that info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicarious Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, rochesterdave said: 21” being reported near Hamilton Ontario. Lake effect 99% sure that's supposed to be 21cm and someone made a mistake reporting it as inched Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattny88 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 10 hours ago, TugHillMatt said: Hey, Matt. It's Matt. I don't know how accurate it will be, but that amount is a possibility with lake enhancement involved. You never know with lake involvement... How much totals for the city of oswwgo you thinking guud w us getting alot of lake emhanced?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 minute ago, BuffaloWeather said: Im going to say those reports are nonsense. 9 cm (3.6") so far at cyhm. Probably more a bit more closer to the lake. I dont know who the met is reporting larger amounts via tape measurer on twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, WesterlyWx said: There isn't a snowballs chance in hell there was 21" from that, unless it's been sitting there for 4 days under the radar beam LMAO! That’s a 3-4” per hour band Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 Just now, OSUmetstud said: Im going to say those reports are nonsense. 9 cm (3.6") so far at cyhm. Probably more a bit more closer to the lake. I dont know who the met is reporting larger amounts via tape measurer on twitter. Makes sense but that band was definitely strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rochesterdave Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Pic from wx twitter. You guys kill me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrmax Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 minute ago, OSUmetstud said: Im going to say those reports are nonsense. 9 cm (3.6") so far at cyhm. Probably more a bit more closer to the lake. I dont know who the met is reporting larger amounts via tape measurer on twitter. Gotta be cm not inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Idk man. I just dont buy it. Ancaster is very close to the airport in Mt. Hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattny88 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 10 hours ago, TugHillMatt said: Hey, Matt. It's Matt. I don't know how accurate it will be, but that amount is a possibility with lake enhancement involved. You never know with lake involvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said: 48 cm is 19”? Might be possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattny88 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Wolfie tim or cnylesfreaj how much snow totals of you were to give an amoint for oswego cty...particularly city of oswego given the model runs and kuchara???? Much appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 41 cm is 16 inches. I could see that if they had that lake band over them from this morning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Just now, BuffaloWeather said: 48 cm is 19”? Might be possible? I just dont buy it. All of these incredible snow shots on twitter are super zoomed on tape measures. That sounding doesnt lend itself to super lake enhanced rates. 20 cm i could buy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Looks like lake enhanced can tell l from those huge fluffed up flakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, tim123 said: Looks like lake enhanced can tell l from those huge fluffed up flakes Yeah thanks. Its obviously lake enhanced. That doesnt mean it was 50 cm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, mattny88 said: Wolfie tim or cnylesfreaj how much snow totals of you were to give an amoint for oswego cty...particularly city of oswego given the model runs and kuchara???? Much appreciated 2 feet min. Up too 3 feet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Lolz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayuud11 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said: I just dont buy it. All of these incredible snow shots on twitter are super zoomed on tape measures. That sounding doesnt lend itself to super lake enhanced rates. 20 cm i could buy. High snowfall ratios my friend, it barely felt like snowing out there today and we already got 5-6” here in the city so those amounts might be possible if they had that band over them all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.