pasnownut Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:50 AM, stormtracker said: It's the NAM, but it is different out west at H5 vs globals Expand less diggy, flatter. As you guys say....we take and for comparisons sake, at 78 notably so at 500. Extrapolate from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris78 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:55 AM, losetoa6 said: Nam looks to almost totally leave the sw behind . Extrap = no north stream linking ...we take .lol Expand Is this what the ukie does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasnownut Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:55 AM, losetoa6 said: Nam looks to almost totally leave the sw behind . Extrap = no north stream linking ...we take .lol Expand lol. look at my post above. I dont even know you.... thats funny. talk about "ninjad" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:53 AM, yoda said: Because of the confluence pressing down and the h5 low in W TX and the location of the ridge out west? I know it wont happen, just trying to learn something here real quick Before the GFS gets on board lolHere is Euro at same time frame about to phase the streams. With nam..that low would slowly move east and not phase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:55 AM, losetoa6 said: Nam looks to almost totally leave the sw behind . Extrap = no north stream linking ...we take .lol Expand That was our only hope. I was thinking about that for a couple days but didn't want to say it since no model was anywhere close. It will make things a very tiny bit interesting for the next 40 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasnownut Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 3:07 AM, losetoa6 said: Definitely interesting. If it were to totally leave it behind its possible a southern slider could occur in that scenario..if the strong PV lobe is still close when it would approach. Uk verbatim might be the best with a delayed approach allowing high pressure to build and riding the boundary but it's hard to say for sure . I'm not sure which is better honest Expand easy... the one w/ the most snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:49 AM, Ji said: Hecs incoming Expand It’s on a roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 3:13 AM, losetoa6 said: Ukie still shares a partial ns link verbatim..but enough separation to get it done for many Expand It's our only path to a good snowfall so we root for a clean disconnect. A partial phase late is ok because the ridging won't destroy the mids nearly as easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Icon is the first to piss in the punch bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGolfBro Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 2:49 AM, Ji said: Hecs incoming Expand Maybe a BECS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 3:26 AM, psuhoffman said: Icon is the first to piss in the punch bowl. Expand It doesn't make sense. The 84 hour nam never misleads us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 GFS did trend quite a bit weaker, but nothing like the NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGolfBro Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 3:50 AM, Amped said: GFS did trend quite a bit weaker, but nothing like the NAM Expand Give the GFS time. It wants to be the NAM so bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peribonca Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 The Western ridge is shifting East on the GFS every run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Gfs is big change h5 separation city Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 The difference at 500 on gfs is laughable between 18z and 00z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 3:59 AM, Ralph Wiggum said: Expand What gives? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Lol 998mb SLP over LI at 111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Pretty close what the 12z UKMET did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 4:00 AM, Ji said: The difference at 500 on gfs is laughable between 18z and 00z Expand We were lol at the nam but the gfs took a major step towards that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 4:02 AM, Amped said: Pretty close what the 12z UKMET did. Expand I dont think the 2M temps are close though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 4:02 AM, Maestrobjwa said: What gives? Lol Expand Divorce of jet streams between runs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peribonca Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Just a bit more separation and we're back to the secs that was originally hyped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Slp over Pitt at 18z now over nw SC at 0z lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 4:04 AM, yoda said: I dont think the 2M temps are close though Expand Never saw those on the UKMET. But the GFS is likely mishandling the CAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris78 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Huge difference with 2m temps between 18z and 00z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 1/16/2019 at 4:04 AM, Ralph Wiggum said: Divorce of jet streams between runs Expand So that's one marriage we don't really want to work out...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Cmc joined the party Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Canadian south as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.