Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,909
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

January 2019 Discussion II


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  On 1/15/2019 at 4:21 PM, Baroclinic Zone said:

I think you'll be hard-pressed to see the MLs close off with this given the setup.  This is basic an open wave storm developing along the arctic boundary.  It's not a re-developer.

Expand  

Definitely agree BOB , was just talking hypothetically 

i shouldn’t have said “my concern is in reply to rays post “, was more the reality is if H7 miraculously closes its (H7 track) going over CNE most likely , not the SLP

i Wanna see models sneak a meso low out under me until game time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/15/2019 at 4:14 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Uber phased idea is BS imo.

We'll see.

Expand  

essentially ...I agree.

But with caution - in fairness, you can have higher velocity flow phasing ...but it's rarer. There is d(t) requirement in the N-S axis that is harmonic with the d(t) in the W-E... If those are off.. the system's phasing potential smears less proficiency along a gradually increasing destructive interference ...until there is non at all. 

The idea ...if the W-E is moving at a ludicrous speed already, that N stream has to be handled within that frame work of moving parts with pretty exquisite precision - good luck getting that done from 144 hours out and a bunch of mechanics still over the Pacific...  

Just another run... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/15/2019 at 4:21 PM, Baroclinic Zone said:

I think you'll be hard-pressed to see the MLs close off with this given the setup.  This is basic an open wave storm developing along the arctic boundary.  It's not a re-developer.

Expand  

Its moving to quickly to close this off as it rides the boundary unless it went full phase over the Midwest, Then it would be congrats BUF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/15/2019 at 4:27 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Oh..mid levels?

Absolutely. I thought you meant surface low.

Expand  

No that would be hard to imagine , and I would be doing a dual dive w you into refreshing Merrimack river

I am contemplating what the upper potential is for ice accretion should 850’s torch for half the QPF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...