Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter Storm? Jan 18-19th, 2019


cyclone77

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, beavis1729 said:

Yeah, seems like the surface lows are generally similar in strength and location on the 12z GFS and 12z NAM...but for Chicago area, GFS shows about 0.4” of liquid and NAM is close to 1”. Splitting the difference is probably a reasonable approach for now. 0.7” of liquid at 13:1 ratios implies about 9” of snow. Admittedly it’s a very rough estimate, but we will see what other hi res guidance starts showing as it gets into better range.

Either way, lake effect/enhancement will be an interesting wildcard. 

between the lead FGEN band, the true system snow, and then LES..NE IL could snow at various intensities for around 30 hours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, janetjanet998 said:

between the lead FGEN band, the true system snow, and then LES..NE IL could snow at various intensities for around 30 hours

Yep, there will be an overlap area that gets in on all of that... anywhere from far southeast WI southward to Cook county.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I am on board with double digit totals near the lake around Chicago.  Have been leaning that way since yesterday.  If everything goes right and no aspect of this underperforms -- placement of initial band is good, rest of the system snows come through, and LES doesn't shift away too fast, then I wouldn't even rule out localized 18-ish amounts.  But just going 10+ is a safer call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

12z ECMWF is finally caving and coming north. Not sure to what degree yet though.

It took a step, but still nowhere near other guidance.

It actually has the same issue as the UKMET. The smaller waves ejecting out ahead of the main trough, which go into the phasing of everything, eject out sooner and are faster...thus the trough ends up more positive tilt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

It took a step, but still nowhere near other guidance.

It actually has the same issue as the UKMET. The smaller waves ejecting out ahead of the main trough, which go into the phasing of everything, eject out sooner and are faster...thus the trough ends up more positive tilt.

Better signal of the FGEN band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

It took a step, but still nowhere near other guidance.

It actually has the same issue as the UKMET. The smaller waves ejecting out ahead of the main trough, which go into the phasing of everything, eject out sooner and are faster...thus the trough ends up more positive tilt.

Even with those issues it still has what is likely warning criteria snowfall across a good portion of N IL outside that snow dome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RogueWaves said:

..and GRR will "think about it" then issue a purple box. (or do I have the order reversed?) :rolleyes:

They issued a WWA for the possibility of a glazing of ice the other day... the forecast discussion read like this “Going to err on the side of caution and issue an advisory”. I’m thinking, but when we have a storm with 6”+ of snow on the table shouldn’t you “err on side of caution” and issue a watch?? Oh wait, they’re expecting 1-2” with locally higher amounts :lol:

 

Like the looks of the short range models this morning as well as the GFS and NAM. Looks more typical and inline with WAA snows which tend to overperform in situations like this. Will feel more solid about this storm after 00z tonight with full sampling of the energy off the pacific coast. Chicago could easily end up with some double digit snow due to lake enhancement. A rare occurrence on that side of the pond - interesting system to watch unfold.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...