Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,914
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    deltadavewx
    Newest Member
    deltadavewx
    Joined

WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/9/2019 at 4:14 PM, WxUSAF said:

yup, was just thinking about this.  I'd rather go back to a juiced up WAA overrunning with a primary low in KY that transfers to the coast.  GGEM is more like this with about the same result given a weaker CCB from the coastal.  

Expand  

me too but nothing comes easy, this can still work IF even for me IF the system is slightly more amplified but that's too many if's for my liking.  Would rather go back to the easy can't miss idea of a WAA thump into a cold high and not be worrying about phasing and perfect track and all that jazz...definitely like the chances down your way better than up here ATT.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:09 PM, psuhoffman said:

my only fear for those of us north of DC...this could be evolving into an all or nothing setup.  The coastal idea ups the ante BUT it could also rob the WAA and dynamics from the initial wave (or that could ride north of us) and then the coastal could be mostly a miss for places NW of 95.  That would be the doomsday scenario here.  Of course at this range its equally likely the coastal ends up slightly more amplified and is a hit for all.  I guess it depends on if your a glass half empty/full kinda person.  But this setup is higher risk reward.  

Expand  

Yeah that snow map FWIW is no friend to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:09 PM, psuhoffman said:

my only fear for those of us north of DC...this could be evolving into an all or nothing setup.  The coastal idea ups the ante BUT it could also rob the WAA and dynamics from the initial wave (or that could ride north of us) and then the coastal could be mostly a miss for places NW of 95.  That would be the doomsday scenario here.  Of course at this range its equally likely the coastal ends up slightly more amplified and is a hit for all.  I guess it depends on if your a glass half empty/full kinda person.  But this setup is higher risk reward.  

Expand  

I like the go big scenario but I agree that we could end up watching the coastal miss us to the east, which would be agonizing after last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:18 PM, psuhoffman said:

no it's a miller a but if it develops too late it could miss areas up here thats all.  The storms that missed us to the southeast the last 2 Januarys were miller a storms.  Not every miller a becomes a HECS for us.  

Expand  

And looking at the GFS you can see a little bit of the potential for some of the analogs you mentioned yesterday. Going to be quite a ride over the next few days for better or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:17 PM, psuhoffman said:

me too but nothing comes easy, this can still work IF even for me IF the system is slightly more amplified but that's too many if's for my liking.  Would rather go back to the easy can't miss idea of a WAA thump into a cold high and not be worrying about phasing and perfect track and all that jazz...definitely like the chances down your way better than up here ATT.  

Expand  

so dont you think that IF the HP scoots that we can get a northerly correction and keep the advection out in front?  I realize its a tit for tat scenario, but as we've been seeing the elongated structure, I'd just think that if that were to happen, while losing some forcing, we still have enough for that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:18 PM, psuhoffman said:

no it's a miller a but if it develops too late it could miss areas up here thats all.  The storms that missed us to the southeast the last 2 Januarys were miller a storms.  Not every miller a becomes a HECS for us.  

Expand  

Looks Miller b or hybrid to me with a triple point and forced to redevelop around that strong HP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:18 PM, EastCoast NPZ said:

Yeah that snow map FWIW is no friend to me.

Expand  

Yea we are one happy family but unfortunately there are kind of two climos in here. The nw 1/3 of this forum would much prefer the idea from a couple days ago of a storm coming up to our west into the TN Valley and a big WAA thump.  The coastal idea can work here too but it can also be a total fail as we have experienced lately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:25 PM, psuhoffman said:

Yea we are one happy family but unfortunately there are kind of two climos in here. The nw 1/3 of this forum would much prefer the idea from a couple days ago of a storm coming up to our west into the TN Valley and a big WAA thump.  The coastal idea can work here too but it can also be a total fail as we have experienced lately. 

Expand  

Just hug the Fv3 and move on. It has the qpf jack over you and we ALL know that's the most likely scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:35 PM, Scraff said:

And if we can get 10:1 or even 12:1? I’d lock it up now and hide the key...well until Chuck finds it anyway. 

Expand  

I did a way-too-early look at GFS soundings.  Lift is obviously not strong given the weak low and lack of strong frontogenesis, but there's a deep dendrite growth layer throughout the storm.  Should be good for nice ratios.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/9/2019 at 4:27 PM, Bob Chill said:

Just hug the Fv3 and move on. It has the qpf jack over you and we ALL know that's the most likely scenario

Expand  

I'm not hugging anything. Way too many moving parts, especially  if this comes out in pieces. It's likely we still have more twists and turns to go. But I like simple and this is complicated. Complicated often ends up without snow on my lawn. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...