raindancewx Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 I don't do Fall outlooks, but if I had done a Fall outlook, you really can't find a better match long-term than 1995 for the Nino zones. But I do expect 2007 to take over later in the fall. This is Nino 3.4 1995 27.57 27.49 27.75 28.10 27.82 27.59 27.08 26.23 2007 27.24 26.88 27.10 27.50 27.46 27.37 26.71 26.14 2020 27.14 27.11 27.76 28.17 27.65 27.38 26.99 26.30 Nino 4 - 1995 29.04 28.91 29.03 29.14 29.31 29.18 28.93 28.65 2007 28.97 28.66 28.66 28.73 28.84 28.90 28.68 28.48 2020 29.16 28.97 29.07 29.15 29.00 29.09 28.89 28.50 The biggest problem with 1995 is the PDO I think - 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z -0.82 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z -0.57 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z 0.09 2020-06-01T00:00:00Z -0.08 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z -0.38 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z -0.28 https://oceanview.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/tabledap/cciea_OC_PDO.htmlTable?time,PDO 1995-03-01T00:00:00Z 0.75 1995-04-01T00:00:00Z 0.83 1995-05-01T00:00:00Z 1.46 1995-06-01T00:00:00Z 1.27 1995-07-01T00:00:00Z 1.71 1995-08-01T00:00:00Z 0.21 90% of the time, maybe more, the PDO values are -2 to +2. So +1.7 in July 1995 and -0.4 in July 2020 is a massive difference. Even the August difference is still pretty substantial. It popped back up too - to +1.2 in September, and on/off again was pretty positive through Spring. Nino 1.2 has been warming. If that continues into October, then the PDO won't go as negative as it looked a few weeks ago. If it really warmed up a lot, it might even go positive, but I don't expect that. You can see cooling lately in some of the areas you'd want for a -PDO on Tropical Tidbits (by the coast of Western Canada), but also hints of cooling east of Japan where you'd want cooling for the +PDO. This is what I have tentatively for winter, with the analogs removed, since people need to come up with their own ideas - Here is how the analog package looks compared to September. It is also similar on solar, ENSO trends, and actual US temperatures for July-September (assuming the forecast NE/Western heat continues to burn off cold in those areas). You can see that the transition in the La Nina is the same in my analogs as on the CFS. I was a bit surprised to see the cold eastern Atlantic show up in September in both 2020 and the analogs, because it definitely warms up by winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Nino 4 looks like it is cooling at the surface, but still pretty warm below. It does look like the cold is bleeding West, which is what the models show, and what happened in years like 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted September 28, 2020 Share Posted September 28, 2020 Still looks a lot like 2007, especially in Nino 3.4 and 4. Nino1+2 Nino3 Nino34 Nino4 Week SST SSTA SST SSTA SST SSTA SST SSTA 05SEP2007 19.4-1.1 23.7-1.2 26.0-0.8 28.3-0.4 12SEP2007 18.6-1.8 23.6-1.3 25.8-1.0 28.0-0.6 19SEP2007 18.5-2.0 23.6-1.2 25.8-0.9 28.0-0.7 26SEP2007 18.4-2.1 23.2-1.7 25.6-1.1 28.0-0.7 02SEP2020 18.9-1.6 23.6-1.3 25.8-0.9 28.4-0.3 09SEP2020 19.5-1.0 23.4-1.4 25.7-1.0 28.5-0.2 16SEP2020 20.0-0.4 23.6-1.3 25.9-0.8 28.2-0.4 23SEP2020 19.6-0.8 23.6-1.2 25.7-1.0 28.1-0.5 October is depicted like a relatively canonical MJO phase five October, and an almost identical match to 1964 on the CFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 Further intensification and westward progression of the Niña seems likely should this trade surge on the ECMWF come to fruition. Looks to me like we’re heading for a moderate event. Seems like MEI is paralleling 2007 as well to a decent degree. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 7 hours ago, andyhb said: Further intensification and westward progression of the Niña seems likely should this trade surge on the ECMWF come to fruition. Looks to me like we’re heading for a moderate event. Seems like MEI is paralleling 2007 as well to a decent degree. I agree. CFS showing it to a lesser degree: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 Can see it picking up the low frequency signal there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Canadian has a long lasting La Nina that gradually becomes centered pretty far West. It trended stronger than before. Nino 4 would stay cold for a long time in this depiction - that hasn't happened in close to a decade. The monthly sea surface temperature readings for the September monthlies should look a lot like 2007. On the Canadian, the cold ring by NW North America tries to develop around the warm tongue east of Japan. That'd be a pretty healthy and canonical -PDO, which is a pretty warm signal for the SE. Good for the NW to be cold. Pretty strong dry signal in the SW, especially Fall and Spring, locally it peaks as an indicator in November and May. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 On 9/22/2020 at 9:58 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: @raindancewx What are your thoughts on this research? +QBO in cool ENSO seasons favoring more N PAC ridging.... There seem to be two areas impacted by the QBO in the US from what I can see. For whatever reason, there is a pretty big difference in the South Central US between La Ninas with a QBO -2 or lower and La Ninas with a QBO +2 or higher. The same NW areas are still cold though. The years with a drop off in QBO values in Summer (JJA) to Winter (DJF) seem to feature at least some cold dumps into the central US more reliably. So that's the coldest La Nina/QBO composite I could find. The rising QBO years are more amplified, with broader warmth and cold in the NW. We aren't in the first situation. The QBO was about 0 in JJA and rising. That map (rising) as a composite gives the same features as winters with a QBO >2. So unless you live in Kansas, most areas are pretty similar regardless of what you do with the QBO. These composites are so small and erratic, that I'd say they mean almost nothing in aggregate. I did draw in some dummy high/low positions without checking the maps as a guess for how the composites might be varying. I'm personally much more interested in the ACE value for the Atlantic at this point. The long-term average is about 105.6 so we're still technically below an average season (1981-2010), and La Ninas average 128 ACE from 1930-2019. October averages about 15 ACE, and I doubt there has ever been an October ACE over 50. Locally, there is a very strong correlation in La Nina years to how cold we get at the coldest time of the year here - Dec 16-Jan 15, when the average high is 46 and the average low is 24. So quite curious to see how high the ACE gets. The projected mid-Dec to mid-Jan value high on the image below is reliably (~5/6) within 3.3 degrees of observations, and actually tends to be a lot closer than that if ACE isn't under 65 or so where most of the outliers are. I've looked at Neutral and El Nino years here, and you don't have a relationship like this in any month from October-May. The relationship holds well over time too - 1933 is the dot furthest to the right with the highest ACE. My sense is a low ACE La Nina went into phases 4-5-6 fairly often during the heat of the hurricane season. Five, or the "five look" with a warm Nino 4 can be very cold here if it shows up again in late December like in 2007. Below the surface, 100-180W looks a lot like a combination of 2003, 2007, 2010, 2017 for July-September, and the match is fairly close to what the models show for October and how September ended up. I'm not a fan of 2010 and 2017, they both have timing and severity issues. There are non-ENSO things I like about 2003, but can go more into that when I put my outlook up in a week or two. https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ocean/index/heat_content_index.txt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 4, 2020 Share Posted October 4, 2020 All of the Nino zones came in below the 1951-2010 historical averages in September. Compared to September 2007, the current La Nina is consistently 0.2-0.4C warmer in all zones Nino 4 Nino 3.4 Nino 3 Nino 1.2 2007 28.11 25.61 23.63 19.75 2020 28.28 25.96 23.93 19.54 In the 1950-2019 data, you don't have any years where Nino 3.4 dropped off by more than ~1.0C from September to Dec-Feb. So it's pretty likely this event will come in 25.0C or warmer, as the subsurface data had previously implied. I think a couple months could come in around 25.5C - but we'll have to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 Latest Niño 3.4 multi-model ensemble from BOM is pretty locked into a moderate or even strong Niña peak in December. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 32 minutes ago, andyhb said: Latest Niño 3.4 multi-model ensemble from BOM is pretty locked into a moderate or even strong Niña peak in December. Yeah I was looking at that yesterday it's definitely not out of the realm of possibility. Do you know what may be causing the NOAA/NASA/BoM models to go stronger? Wasn't sure if it was a model bias of some sort. One thought of mine is that those models in particular have a stronger area of suppression over the central Pacific resulting in stronger easterlies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 10 hours ago, It's Always Sunny said: Yeah I was looking at that yesterday it's definitely not out of the realm of possibility. Do you know what may be causing the NOAA/NASA/BoM models to go stronger? Wasn't sure if it was a model bias of some sort. One thought of mine is that those models in particular have a stronger area of suppression over the central Pacific resulting in stronger easterlies? Your guess is as good as mine. I know the Euro tends to be a bit warm biased with ENSO and the CFS (NOAA) tends to be bullish with ENSO so I’d stake my claims somewhere in between. We haven’t had a Niña this well developed since probably 2010-2012. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 6 minutes ago, andyhb said: Your guess is as good as mine. I know the Euro tends to be a bit warm biased with ENSO and the CFS (NOAA) tends to be bullish with ENSO so I’d stake my claims somewhere in between. We haven’t had a Niña this well developed since probably 2010-2012. Yeah that would make sense. I'm really interested in how this upcoming severe season will play out since 2010 & 2011 were bonkers with a well established (moderate to strong) La Nina. I read your post about the drought and its downstream affect on early season severe potential in the east. Good stuff. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeselandSkies Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 1 hour ago, It's Always Sunny said: Yeah that would make sense. I'm really interested in how this upcoming severe season will play out since 2010 & 2011 were bonkers with a well established (moderate to strong) La Nina. I read your post about the drought and its downstream affect on early season severe potential in the east. Good stuff. 2010 was decent across the board (May 10/19 in OK, May 22 in SD, several days in June along/east of the MS). 2011 was definitely very east-weighted not to mention bonkers in April. 2012 was drought city from the Rockies to the Appalachians and from the Rio Grande to the Red of the North; but still had two very high-end events early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 General warming again in Nino 1.2 Way ahead of 2016 and 2017, 2008 at this point. Somewhat colder than 2011 too most spots. Nino1+2 Nino3 Nino34 Nino4 Week SST SSTA SST SSTA SST SSTA SST SSTA 02SEP2020 18.9-1.6 23.6-1.3 25.8-0.9 28.4-0.3 09SEP2020 19.5-1.0 23.4-1.4 25.7-1.0 28.5-0.2 16SEP2020 20.0-0.4 23.6-1.3 25.9-0.8 28.2-0.4 23SEP2020 19.6-0.8 23.6-1.2 25.7-1.0 28.1-0.5 30SEP2020 20.1-0.5 23.8-1.1 25.6-1.1 27.9-0.7 30AUG2017 20.3-0.2 24.5-0.4 26.5-0.2 28.8 0.2 06SEP2017 20.4-0.1 24.3-0.6 26.2-0.6 28.7 0.1 13SEP2017 19.7-0.7 24.0-0.9 26.1-0.6 28.7 0.0 20SEP2017 19.3-1.1 23.9-1.0 26.3-0.4 28.7 0.0 27SEP2017 19.5-1.0 24.4-0.5 26.5-0.2 28.4-0.2 31AUG2016 20.9 0.3 24.6-0.3 26.0-0.7 28.5-0.1 07SEP2016 20.8 0.3 24.6-0.3 26.1-0.7 28.6-0.1 14SEP2016 20.6 0.2 24.7-0.2 26.1-0.6 28.5-0.2 21SEP2016 21.2 0.8 24.8-0.1 26.3-0.4 28.5-0.2 28SEP2016 21.2 0.6 24.7-0.2 25.9-0.8 28.1-0.5 31AUG2011 20.0-0.5 24.4-0.5 26.1-0.7 28.3-0.4 07SEP2011 19.7-0.7 24.2-0.7 26.1-0.7 28.2-0.5 14SEP2011 19.6-0.8 24.1-0.7 26.0-0.8 28.0-0.7 21SEP2011 19.8-0.6 24.3-0.6 25.9-0.9 27.8-0.9 28SEP2011 19.9-0.6 24.1-0.7 26.0-0.7 28.0-0.7 03SEP2008 21.3 0.8 25.3 0.4 26.6-0.2 28.1-0.6 10SEP2008 21.0 0.6 25.2 0.3 26.6-0.2 28.1-0.6 17SEP2008 21.1 0.8 24.9 0.1 26.4-0.4 28.1-0.6 24SEP2008 21.3 0.8 25.1 0.2 26.4-0.4 28.1-0.6 01OCT2008 21.0 0.4 24.7-0.2 26.2-0.5 28.3-0.4 Still way warmer than 2010 though in all zones. 01SEP2010 18.8-1.7 23.4-1.5 25.1-1.7 27.2-1.5 08SEP2010 19.1-1.3 23.5-1.4 25.2-1.6 27.1-1.6 15SEP2010 18.6-1.8 23.4-1.5 25.1-1.6 27.1-1.6 22SEP2010 19.3-1.2 24.0-0.8 25.1-1.6 27.1-1.6 29SEP2010 19.2-1.4 23.5-1.3 24.8-1.9 27.1-1.6 06OCT2010 18.7-1.9 23.2-1.7 24.8-1.9 27.1-1.6 Very close to 2007 in Nino 3.4 and identical in 4. Pretty different in Nino 1.2 - but 2007 warmed up a lot there in December, so might snap back toward 2007 then. 1995 is close too. 05SEP2007 19.4-1.1 23.7-1.2 26.0-0.8 28.3-0.4 12SEP2007 18.6-1.8 23.6-1.3 25.8-1.0 28.0-0.6 19SEP2007 18.5-2.0 23.6-1.2 25.8-0.9 28.0-0.7 26SEP2007 18.4-2.1 23.2-1.7 25.6-1.1 28.0-0.7 03OCT2007 18.3-2.3 23.2-1.7 25.4-1.3 27.9-0.7 06SEP1995 20.4 0.0 24.1-0.8 26.0-0.8 28.2-0.5 13SEP1995 19.9-0.5 24.1-0.8 26.0-0.7 28.0-0.6 20SEP1995 20.2-0.2 24.0-0.9 26.1-0.7 28.4-0.3 27SEP1995 20.2-0.3 23.9-1.0 25.9-0.8 28.4-0.3 30SEP2020 20.1-0.5 23.8-1.1 25.6-1.1 27.9-0.7 The September NAO was more positive than I expected. When I run my NAO script, it suggested several possible blends, but I think this one is probably the best for what it will do: 2020: 1961, 2003, 2007. March would also be somewhat negative in this scenario. In prior years, 1993, 2017, 2017 was a good blend for 2019. Generally, you look for the best match that has similar ENSO tendencies for May-Apr and Sept-Mar for the NAO state. If you don't have a good ENSO match available because of some unusual combination of NAO changes, the best blend overall will typically work, based on testing from 1995-2019. 1975 is a good match to 2018 1990, 1990, 1994 was a good match for 2017 2004, 2010, 2011 was a good match for 2016 1992, 1994 was a good match for 2015. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 As best I can tell, there are only 17 hurricanes to hit the US Gulf Coast in October since 1931. It's interesting to see 1964 show up as one of the years (Hilda), with one of the once a decade non-Florida hurricane landfalls on the Gulf in October. Have to see if Delta actually follows the current projected track. The closest tracks since 1931 in October to Delta are probably Nate (2017), Hilda (1964), Opal (1995), Lili (2002), and Jerry (1989). Of those years, 1964 is the only one with a warm NW October though (currently 5-10 above normal in some places in Oregon). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 On 10/5/2020 at 2:21 AM, It's Always Sunny said: Yeah I was looking at that yesterday it's definitely not out of the realm of possibility. Do you know what may be causing the NOAA/NASA/BoM models to go stronger? Wasn't sure if it was a model bias of some sort. One thought of mine is that those models in particular have a stronger area of suppression over the central Pacific resulting in stronger easterlies? I would be modestly surprised if this la nina registered as an official moderate event per ONI, and would be stunned if it ended up strong...I guess we will see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 It will be interesting to see how much DELTA going coo coo for coco puffs can spike the ACE. Should remain a major for several days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 22 hours ago, CheeselandSkies said: 2010 was decent across the board (May 10/19 in OK, May 22 in SD, several days in June along/east of the MS). 2011 was definitely very east-weighted not to mention bonkers in April. 2012 was drought city from the Rockies to the Appalachians and from the Rio Grande to the Red of the North; but still had two very high-end events early. I was just referring to how active they were. 2010 had record setting May (304) & June (324) numbers. 2011 had a whopping 758 tornados in April (highest ever on record) and May had 326 which was also amongst the highest. You're right about 2012 relatively speaking. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 Those are definitely not record setting May numbers. May 2003, 2004, and 2008 all had around 500 tornadoes, 2015 and 2019 were also more active. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's Always Sunny Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 19 minutes ago, andyhb said: Those are definitely not record setting May numbers. May 2003, 2004, and 2008 all had around 500 tornadoes, 2015 and 2019 were also more active. What I meant by record setting is top 10-15 I should've phrased that differently. 2003 had 543, 2004 had 509, 2008 had 462. May 2011 would be 9th most active May. May 2010 is actually 12th but still impressive in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 ACE on the CSU site has updated at least twice today and is currently 111.4 as of late Tuesday. It seems generally you add 1 point for a weak tropical storm that lasts all day, 2 for a weak hurricane that lasts all day, 3 for a major hurricane, and 4 for a category 5. This system has four days left until it dies, so the ACE should get into the low 120s, which is still the mid point of the 80-160 La Nina composite favoring a cold NW. By 10/10, the season is typically 85% or more over, but it can be less, and it can be more. I lean toward a couple more tropical storms after Delta, but this is probably the last big system this year. You'll probably see some big weakening if Delta hit Mexico, and then a larger, weaker hurricane after. The Gulf of Mexico is pretty spent at the moment, so it is fairly cold. So I lean toward 2.5 points a day for the next four days from Delta. We'll see how close 10/10, at 5 pm MST is to 121 ACE. I'm planning to release my outlook 10/10. I've got 50+ slides this year, but most of it is pictures. I've got a pretty hot winter in some parts of the South - mostly the coastal SE and especially Texas. I have the interior West cold, but not that cold. I have most of the East warm, but still much colder than last year. Statistically, the odds of a wet December here are near 0% if the ACE is above 160, and near 50% if the ACE is under 160 in La Ninas over the past 90 years. So do want to see how high the ACE gets. Since mid-September my outlook has assumed years with 95-175 Atlantic ACE would be similar, given about 135 ACE this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 This is the Euro plume from October 1 for the La Nina. I've drawn in my expectations - I think this event could peak pretty strong. But I also think the Euro is right about a pretty quick turnaround/warm up after January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 The Nina will die muahaha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Cold ENSO with low sea ice since 2007...v. Cold ENSO with (relatively) high sea ice since 2007. Really curious to see if this works in 2020. I don't really look at 2007, 2012, and 2016 as similar...they are very different ENSO events. But they all have the low-sea ice and cold West. I put 2011 in both because it was cold in NM/TX at the border of the two cold areas, and the 4.3m square km also seems to be the borderline threshold for this. The ACE index is higher on the left image, so maybe this is just all an Atlantic thing, since both sea ice and ACE are tied broadly to the AMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 What do you think about Western drought and Washington drought compared to this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric11 Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 16 hours ago, raindancewx said: This is the Euro plume from October 1 for the La Nina. I've drawn in my expectations - I think this event could peak pretty strong. But I also think the Euro is right about a pretty quick turnaround/warm up after January. Hey raindancewx,I'm a newbie interested in atomspheric science and have been tracking your post since last summer.I lived in China so I'm more familiar with the climate in East Asia than America.One thing I'd like to share is that I found 2020 really behaves like 1954,at least in East Asia part.Both have rather weak monsoon,record-breaking,prolonged flood, and definitely late starting of typhoon season.Outside Asia,some other similarities can be found in America like the western drought/big ridge in summertime(I'm not quite clear what's 1954 autumn looks like),a active hurricane season but with moderate ACE(1954 had 16 storms with 110 ACE,2020 has 24 storms with around 111 ACE so far).1954 and 2020 are both low solar years, fast-transition Nina after prolonged,weak Nino events.So why not consider 1954 as a good analog?I know the subsurface temperature differs too much but I rather prefer a weaker,shorter 1954-like event for this year.Btw,2007 really works out as a good analog in East Asia,appreciate for your precise prediction! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 That is quite a strong signal from the ECMWF seasonal, which is commonly warm biased with ENSO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 7 hours ago, Eric11 said: Hey raindancewx,I'm a newbie interested in atomspheric science and have been tracking your post since last summer.I lived in China so I'm more familiar with the climate in East Asia than America.One thing I'd like to share is that I found 2020 really behaves like 1954,at least in East Asia part.Both have rather weak monsoon,record-breaking,prolonged flood, and definitely late starting of typhoon season.Outside Asia,some other similarities can be found in America like the western drought/big ridge in summertime(I'm not quite clear what's 1954 autumn looks like),a active hurricane season but with moderate ACE(1954 had 16 storms with 110 ACE,2020 has 24 storms with around 111 ACE so far).1954 and 2020 are both low solar years, fast-transition Nina after prolonged,weak Nino events.So why not consider 1954 as a good analog?I know the subsurface temperature differs too much but I rather prefer a weaker,shorter 1954-like event for this year.Btw,2007 really works out as a good analog in East Asia,appreciate for your precise prediction! I like 1954 as an analog. My statistical predictors for temperatures in the Southwest have that year as the best match to 2020 - huge number of hot Summer days, similar ENSO, ENSO trends, and solar, weak monsoon in the US, India and East Asia. For La Nina years the more recent events tend to be surrounded by warm waters in the Pacific that were not really present in older years like 1954. I view La Nina winters in the US as more Atlantic driven than Pacific driven in most spots, so the mid-1950s to 1963 representing the late warm AMO of that era is similar too, Where I live, the top matches for June-September in a La Nina are 2007, 1973, and 1954. My guess is the similarities to 1954 and 2020 have to do with relatively early substantial La Nina strength late Summer in both years and similar MJO trends and similar net ACE output in the Atlantic. But the MJO data doesn't exist before the 1970s. The sea ice extent in some years in the 1950s probably dropped to around 5 million square kilometers in September, but that is still well above this year too, which has to have some effect. Where I live, the coldest La Nina years tend to follow a) early heat (first 90 degree Fahrenheit (F) years), b) consistent heat - I know 1954 had 118 days 87F or hotter from April-October. We're at 111 this year. Both had 90 degree heat by mid-May If I did a purely ENSO based winter forecast, I'd probably blend 1954, 1964, 2007 for the winter, double weighting 1954 and 2007. For an American perspective, one of the things I like about 1954 is it is a La Nina with an El Nino after a very warm El Nino winter as 2020 will be. Something like this is probably the best case scenario for the West. It seems to be favored look in low-sea ice cold ENSO since 2007, in cold-ENSO after El Nino (1931, 1954, 1988, 2007, 2016), and in strong La Ninas (2007, 1988, 1954). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raindancewx Posted October 10, 2020 Share Posted October 10, 2020 Here it is: My 2020-21 Winter Outlook for anyone who cares. https://www.scribd.com/document/479516526/Winter-2020-21-Outlook My winter look is ultimately not that different from: a) Cold-ENSO years following two El Nino winters. Since 1930, these are 1931, 1959, 1970, 1978, 2016 as a blend. The 1942 and 2005 La Ninas don't "look" like the others, but I think it is because they followed THREE El Ninos, and not two. b) Cold ENSO years since 2007 with very low-sea ice. The cut off seems to be <4.3 million square km sea-ice extent in September. c) Strong La Ninas. The strongest La Ninas (<25.0C Nino 3.4 DJF) are 1973, 1975, 1988, 1999, 2007. The blend of those years is similar to A & B. Don't know that we get that strong, but it doesn't really impact directly. The crappier strong La Ninas still follow the other patterns - 1999 is the hottest and highest ACE for instance. The years after El Ninos are generally better in the West, and so on, whereas 1975/1999 followed La Ninas. d) +NAO La Nina winter composite. I find if a winter follows an El Nino winter, you want the NAO to be positive in October for a -NAO winter. If you have a -NAO October, you tend to get a +NAO winter. That said, I think you'll see the NAO go negative for at least a time in December and March. e) Middling ACE years. The middle ACE years in La Ninas tend to be colder in the West, hotter in the East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now