Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,619
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Upstate/Eastern New York


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said:

Ecmwf has more separation from the northern and southern stream at 72...the gfs has a more intense and negatively tilted southern stream shortwave. The ecmwf doesnt partially phase with the northern steam like the gfs does through 96. 

gfs_z500a_us_12.png

ecmwf_z500a_us_4.png

gfs_z500a_us_16.png

ecmwf_z500a_us_5.png

The eps was phased with all of yesterday’s runs, it went way southeast today. The spread on eps was so small yesterday, surprised at the big leap. Still 3 days out though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

The eps was phased with all of yesterday’s runs, it went way southeast today. The spread on eps was so small yesterday, surprised at the big leap. Still 3 days out though. 

Right. I think the eps/ecmwf solution is more reasonable since the screaming polar jet from the pv doesnt generally promote phasing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

The eps was phased with all of yesterday’s runs, it went way southeast today. The spread on eps was so small yesterday, surprised at the big leap. Still 3 days out though. 

Also the positioning is further south on the EC at 12z sat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...