Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,602
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

November/December Medium/Long Range Disco


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, showmethesnow said:

Our possible Nov 30/Dec 1 storm probably hinges on how our early next week's storm is handled as it is pulling away. Notice on last nights GEFS that the storm is pulling out slowly and is just above Maine as any possible short wave is running through our south. Also notice how deep and strong this feature is. This is not a good setup as it squashes any energy that may come through as well as  any chances of a storm through our locale.

GEFSday9.gif.f1a4455dd76afe012adc7310e87e1a7a.gif

 

Now this is last nights EPS. Notice that our early next week storm is weaker and has progressed farther north and east vs. the previous example. Also it is swinging through the 50/50 region which is a favored spot for seeing amplification of systems on the east coast. The features are subtle because of smoothing but you do notice a kinking of the isobars around the Mississippi for our shortwave and a slight bulging on the east coast for the beginnings of ridging in front of the system. This is a far better look for possibilities of an east coast storm vs. the GEFS. If we continue to see the EPS advertise a weaker, quicker departing low from the NE on future runs we should see the signal for the shortwave and the ridging in front of it to strengthen. 

EPSday9.gif.b53497d5e92fb27911bcf130b3ab85e0.gif

 

 

 

 Just comparing last night's GFS run with this morning GFS run, it seems like night and day. Last night's run runs a storm well north and west of us while this morning it pops a storm off the MA coast in the December 1st time frame. Is this morning's GFS possibly picking up on what the EPS depicted overnight?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, Wonderdog said:

 Just comparing last night's GFS run with this morning GFS run, it seems like night and day. Last night's run runs a storm well north and west of us while this morning it pops a storm off the MA coast in the December 1st time frame. Is this morning's GFS possibly picking up on what the EPS depicted overnight?

 

Maybe, but I just think it's too far out in time to look at things that closely. Maybe come late in the weekend or early next week, actual individual threats can be identified and analyzed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, yoda said:

Quick clipper-like system moves through at 210-216 with quick burst of snow in the morning for most of us on Friday, November the 30th... 10:1 SR TT snow map suggests 1-3" fwiw

Man, wish we could lock that up. Would love a nice little system like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Op runs are going to be all over the place for several more days still because of two factors:

1.  Complicated interaction of the late weekend/early next week storm and where it ends up parking underneath the NAO ridge.

2. Developing pac firehouse into the west coast. Fast flow and lots of short waves makes things complicated. This jet is going to keep the risk of cutters around until it backs off a bit.  We need need some spacing between waves so we can get some transient ridging out west to help drive something underneath us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Op runs are going to be all over the place for several more days still because of two factors:

1.  Complicated interaction of the late weekend/early next week storm and where it ends up parking underneath the NAO ridge.

2. Developing pac firehouse into the west coast. Fast flow and lots of short waves makes things complicated. This jet is going to keep the risk of cutters around until it backs off a bit.  We need need some spacing between waves so we can get some transient ridging out west to help drive something underneath us.

Good post. Yeah, Pac jet is hurting what would be an excellent setup. Need that ridge established in the west.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Op runs are going to be all over the place for several more days still because of two factors:

1.  Complicated interaction of the late weekend/early next week storm and where it ends up parking underneath the NAO ridge.

2. Developing pac firehouse into the west coast. Fast flow and lots of short waves makes things complicated. This jet is going to keep the risk of cutters around until it backs off a bit.  We need need some spacing between waves so we can get some transient ridging out west to help drive something underneath us.

 

So I take it this would come down to the precise timing of those waves, then?...(And that "pac firehouse"...is that what you guys call a "hostile pac"?) And that precise timing of how much space is between waves...is difficult for the models to figure out right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gfs and euro trending towards ridging in the east around day 10 before the epo ridge flexes day 10-15 and we get cold again. The ridging is in response to the trough in the southwest as Wxusaf said.  I've also seen stats that show the nao correlation to cold in the east is stronger later in winter. It's still a good thing now but something like a bad pna can offset it more now. Ultimately the Pacific looks to take over in a good way and plunge us into a colder look after day 10. That might be a better look for early season snow anyways. An ambiguous but not hostile AO with an EPO and PNA ridge is a much colder pattern and we need that this time of year. And a weaker progressive wave in a colder pattern might be a better shot for the coastal plain then some wound up system in a moderatly cold blocking pattern in early December anyways. 

There would still be a window immediately after the day 6 system if something can amplify and not get squashed. Or perhaps a clipper type system before the ridging takes hold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

So I take it this would come down to the precise timing of those waves, then?...(And that "pac firehouse"...is that what you guys call a "hostile pac"?) And that precise timing of how much space is between waves...is difficult for the models to figure out right now?

Yeah exactly. I wouldn’t say the pac is hostile (blue ball of death in the gulf of AK is hostile), just not optimal.  But yes, fast flow with lots of waves makes it very hard for models to lock into a solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a good example of the problem of an overactive Pac jet in today's Euro.  We have a storm coming toward us that's trying to transfer to the coast because of the -NAO and 50-50 low, but this monster s/w crashing into CA gives us no help.  Need more separation between those waves so that ridging over the Plains backs up about 500-700 miles toward Idaho/Nevada.  

 

ecmwf_z500_mslp_us_10.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Here's a good example of the problem of an overactive Pac jet in today's Euro.  We have a storm coming toward us that's trying to transfer to the coast because of the -NAO and 50-50 low, but this monster s/w crashing into CA gives us no help.  Need more separation between those waves so that ridging over the Plains backs up about 500-700 miles toward Idaho/Nevada.  

 

ecmwf_z500_mslp_us_10.png

From your lips to God's ears.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Here's a good example of the problem of an overactive Pac jet in today's Euro.  We have a storm coming toward us that's trying to transfer to the coast because of the -NAO and 50-50 low, but this monster s/w crashing into CA gives us no help.  Need more separation between those waves so that ridging over the Plains backs up about 500-700 miles toward Idaho/Nevada.  

 

ecmwf_z500_mslp_us_10.png

UGH!!!!! Always somethin'...lol Can we still hope for a 500-700 mile correction in the modeling (I assume it's far enough out to not rule out seeing that?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Maestrobjwa said:

UGH!!!!! Always somethin'...lol Can we still hope for a 500-700 mile correction in the modeling (I assume it's far enough out to not rule out seeing that?)

Yeah, it's possible.  I mean, just scroll through previous runs of the GFS or Euro and you'll see giant storms forming, disappearing, and jumping all over at D10 leads right now.  Perhaps even more than usual for D10.  Odds are just tilted against any big wound up storm impacting us on the happy (cold) side with that jet blasting in.  As @psuhoffman said, EPS seems to pull the Pac jet back past D10 which should help that aspect out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, yoda said:

Not sure I agree... I see a ridge in the east and the h5 doesn't seem to look that great 

I just like that it is showing a large system that doesn't seem to cut... We know there will be some cold air around too.  Just seems like ingredients are coming in to place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, losetoa6 said:

Gefs sure  likes the Dec 2nd timeframe this run. A lot of low  concentration for 10+ out . 

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_44.png

gfs-ens_mslpa_us_45.png

Signal for a "cold" storm has been sporadic, but generally I think we can forget November. Its been looking like Dec 3 (or later) will be the next legit shot on the means for a few days now. Even that might be a little soon, as the NA ridging looks to break down, while the PAC should be starting to trend more favorable. Wouldn't surprise me if its the 7th or later before there is a real shot at widespread frozen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...