Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,703
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Climax
    Newest Member
    Climax
    Joined

April 7-8 2018 jinx


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 278
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've seen this game before I think Newark does better than new York city and long island also does better than nyc. I think central park gets stuck in between bands and has poor rates that's my best guess right now. Also I don't think the Euro will show a better solution I think it either drops south or holds serve. Regardless Newark 3-4 will get a big hit come Saturday and Islip look for 6-8. Central park measly inch

 

Word of the day for NYC  (subsidence)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NewYorkweatherfan said:

I've seen this game before I think Newark does better than new York city and long island also does better than nyc. I think central park gets stuck in between bands and has poor rates that's my best guess right now. Also I don't think the Euro will show a better solution I think it either drops south or holds serve. Regardless Newark 3-4 will get a big hit come Saturday and Islip look for 6-8. Central park measly inch

 

Word of the day for NYC  (subsidence)

Are you ok? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NewYorkweatherfan said:

I've seen this game before I think Newark does better than new York city and long island also does better than nyc. I think central park gets stuck in between bands and has poor rates that's my best guess right now. Also I don't think the Euro will show a better solution I think it either drops south or holds serve. Regardless Newark 3-4 will get a big hit come Saturday and Islip look for 6-8. Central park measly inch

 

Word of the day for NYC  (subsidence)

I think it's way too early for predicting placement of subsidence zones. That's tough even 12 hours out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NutleyBlizzard said:

We most definitely have a shot at 50+. I'm currently at 45''. If my area didn't struggle with subsidence issues in March, I'd be going for 1995/96 levels by now.

The 2nd storm is what failed us; we got 4-5 instead of 20+.....the March 21-22 delivered, but too late in the day to get us to the truly big numbers that were possible in a colder time of year; still after Feb and 80 degrees I wouldn't have predicted snow in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

It only worries me because it is mid spring. Easier to get by with that in January.

I wish I could remember where I read that, but I do recall reading the opposite.

 

500 - 1000 mb thickness is a surrogate for the average temperature in that layer, but how you get there can vary.  If it's warmer near 500mb (but still well below freezing), that gives you a little wiggle room to keep the lower parts of the column cooler and have snow with a partial thickness of 544.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM looks like it’s about to drop it like it’s 1986 or 96 whichever it snowed more looks good early, it doesn’t really look like anafrontal anymore it looks like overrunning than the coastal looks like it’s going to take over like the navgem. Let’s see the rest of the run, this is fudin fun man

4518CF17-94F4-4AAB-BBD0-93E243CFEF0A.png

Edit: it crapped

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...