Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

March 20-21 Short Range Model Analysis


Bob Chill

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 543
  • Created
  • Last Reply

00z NAM suite seems to be removing any concerns raised by the 18z GFS.     The only thing I don't like is that they continue to show us losing some initial heavier precip late tonight to sleet, but a quick inspection of the soundings shows that the offending level is just barely above 0C, so it wouldn't take much to have those profiles be all snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

I'm perfectly fine with 6-8".  Remember, my upside was 4" before.   If you bought into 12" in the urban areas, that's on you.

Yeah... I'm not worried...  Just one question... Which direction was the panic room again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, high risk said:

00z NAM suite seems to be removing any concerns raised by the 18z GFS.     The only thing I don't like is that they continue to show us losing some initial heavier precip late tonight to sleet, but a quick inspection of the soundings shows that the offending level is just barely above 0C, so it wouldn't take much to have those profiles be all snow.

Is the reduction in qpf early on not as concerning  in your opinion? Didn’t gfs do same, current run?

2 minutes ago, fourseasons said:

Um, 12z Wednesday is 8 a.m. Eastern.

Thank you for the two hour correction. Very important contribution 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, high risk said:

00z NAM suite seems to be removing any concerns raised by the 18z GFS.     The only thing I don't like is that they continue to show us losing some initial heavier precip late tonight to sleet, but a quick inspection of the soundings shows that the offending level is just barely above 0C, so it wouldn't take much to have those profiles be all snow.

IAD at 00z had its column all below 0C... would you agree or disagree that I find it hard to believe that DCA wouldn't be right behind in their column by 04z or so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

I just looked at it.  I'm pretty sane.  Looks like 4 to 8" as predicted.  

Umm it’s actually not 4-8” anymore in the same spots. especially around dc proper. 3k is bad, very bad. Stop acting like it wasn’t a major reduction.. IT WAS. And there’s a growing potential for a bust formulating. You have to admit that’s more of a possibility now than It was 6-8 hours ago. Correct? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PivotPoint said:

Umm it’s actually not 4-8” anymore in the same spots. especially around dc proper. 3k is bad, very bad. Stop acting like it wasn’t a major reduction.. IT WAS. And there’s a growing potential for a bust formulating. You have to admit that’s more of a possibility now than It was 6-8 hours ago. Correct? 

You need to step back from the keyboard before you snap. It’s only snow. CHILL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bob Chill said:

That's crossed my mind all day. A ull rolling in like that means business. And it's late March and not Jan. This one is the real deal man. We'll talk about it for years. 

it's a nice setup.  there's a little bit more of an easterly flow right now than i'd like (kinda feels like those april sprinkly days), but i like the vort pass.  if it was north of us, i'd be more concerned.  i also wonder if in a convective storm like this it might be better to go with the globals.  the nam 3k might be making things more hit/miss than they really are.  it's a fun storm and whether it's 2" or 12", i think we need to realize it's the first day of spring lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...