Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

March 20-21 Potential - STORM MODE THREAD


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WeathermanB said:

Take that snowfall totals for DE and divide it by half. Ratios won't be 10:1, unless somehow the temps are below freezing, which probably won't happen until by the end of the snowstorm. But saw a pretty high QPF, and that has some chance of making up for the low ratios.

Dividing by half still gives pretty great totals, and the sleet may accumulate some too - wouldn't surprise me to get a 1-2" layer of sleet like last March, but this March, we get snow on top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, WVclimo said:

Looking at that wet 06Z NAM 12km run with Bufkit shows 0.36" liquid falling as freezing rain at MRB through 2:00 p.m. tomorrow with temps near 30, then 0.46" more as sleet until midnight tomorrow night.  Hopefully the model is too warm upstairs.

Yep, with each passing second I become more convinced that we see lots of rain and sleet, especially down here, then by the time we switch to snow the off-shore coastal robs our moisture and sends it to PA.  We'll be left with light non-accumulating snow Wed morning and a crusty coating of sleet on the grass.  On the plus side, we may have a solid rain storm.  You have a better chance up there to cash-in with at least some snow from the initial thump.  I feel - once again - like I'm in no-man's land.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ryanconway63 said:

What is a better model for this setup currently?  The 3k Nam or 12 or 32

      NAM3 can sometimes overdeepen systems, but it's overall a much better model than the 12.    There is no 32 km NAM;  that is just the 12 km model displayed on a 32 km grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxWatcher007 said:

I’m fine with either honestly. I probably don’t want to be raining at 11pm tomorrow lol but I have no expectations.

Ultimately I guess it doesn't matter for me since management at my office has gotten VERY stingy with snowdays an I'll probably be in the office anyway...

But heavy sleet or even thundersleet could be very fun. I'm expecting awful commutes both tomorrow and Wednesday. 

This storm has been interesting to track. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, high risk said:

      NAM3 can sometimes overdeepen systems, but it's overall a much better model than the 12.    There is no 32 km NAM;  that is just the 12 km model displayed on a 32 km grid.

How do you feel about the temp profiles on the 3K vs the 12? From what little I have seen it looks as if the 3k is outperforming in that regards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, showmethesnow said:

Quick glance but the 3K is very close to exactly what we want to see. If we can't score with that low placement off of OC and the stall when the 500's catch up then this just wasn't meant to be. 

That's pretty much all we can ask for in Mid March.  Hell we will be nowcasting this time tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

I am completely okay with sleet to start - moderate rain I would hate. I think an inch or two of sleet could put down a nice base to accumulate snow on top of once we switch over to all snow. Watching hours of moderate rain will suck, though. 

I fully am at peace with both my climo and my altitude. I do expect a goodly period of decent soaking rainfall, maybe a little sleet then hopefully an inch of snow IF I can manage that. Last I heard, all the heavy snow is north a tad.

No scythe needed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Agree with folks that freezing rain is not really a threat here. Sleet is the story, and if the 3k NAM is right I could see 1-2” accumulate before the flip to powder Wednesday morning.

Yeah, that warm nose is really stout. It's going to take a while to get rid of. With some weak convection likely in the mix, that could play havoc with p-types Wed morning before the flip to snow.

Winds may start to become an issue as well as a MAUL-ish sounding starts to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Yeah, 3k is ideal.

RGEM is going to do the same thing with surface and 850 lows stalling for a time off the mouth of the bay. 3k 850 FGEN panels looks sweet. I know the storm is going to be messy but there is no doubt legit potential for high impact even in the urban corridors. Very interesting atmospheric process we're seeing unfold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

RGEM is going to do the same thing with surface and 850 lows stalling for a time off the mouth of the bay. 3k 850 FGEN panels looks sweet. I know the storm is going to be messy but there is no doubt legit potential for high impact even in the urban corridors. Very interesting atmospheric process we're seeing unfold. 

Where do you get your RGEM from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Where do you get your RGEM from?

Wxbell. @ 48 we're in a band of snow (not terribly heavy) with more to come. Column is great. Low is slowly pulling away. I just like the setup for Wed now. We won't know how the banding/evolution breaks for another 12-24. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, supernovasky said:

3k NAM. Totals cut off at 60h but it's still snowing quite moderately then, with what seems to be lots to come.

 

ZbYYeYO.png

 

I would take that and run with it, because it gives wxtrix a foot of snow at least. She has only had 1.8 inches all winter. That aint right. It's supposed be I get 1.8 inches all winter, and the mountains get about 70 inches all winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friendly reminder with the NAMs and GFS that snow and sleet are tallied together in the model.    So if 0.8" of liquid falls as sleet, the model outputs 0.8" of "snow water equivalent", and if a site like TT applies a 10:1 ratio, you get 8" of snow on the map in a scenario in which you'd have 2-3" of sleet on the ground.    The Ferrier method (available on TT for the NAM3) is much more consistent with the model microphysics.  If sleet is falling, it shows a high rime factor for the falling hydrometeors, and that is translated into a very low (~2:1) SLR.     It's always possible that the NAM3 is overdoing the warm layer, so it could end up snowier than progged, but the Ferrier snow accumulation map *is consistent with what the model is doing*.     The 10:1 is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...