Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,702
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    MDSnow93
    Newest Member
    MDSnow93
    Joined

March 20th-22nd Suppressed, Fish, Not Coming Threat


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

The NAM is a little bit North of the Euro, but wow that is close.

Well, the Euro got over an inch of LE into the NYC proper area.  It may have cut totals north of the city, but it raised them in the city itself.  If that is what the 18z NAM showed, I'll take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those cheerleading the 18z NAM, my point was that it has the same sharp cutoff that the Euro has to the North, except that it's a bit further North. And initially it didn't look like anything was going to make it North of the city at all, but luckily that changed.

If the NAM is even 30-40 miles too far North, nobody North of the city is seeing much of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There is some uncertainty with the ECMWF solution pointing to
lower liquid equivalent amounts, but it appears to be an
outlier from the respect of a weaker closed low off the New
England coast by Wednesday night. The exact placement of the
heavy snow band is also a difficult thing to pinpoint, but a
well defined deformation zone and frontogenesis to the NW of
the low track points to this signal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nibor said:

What’s preventing northern and western precip expansion? Confluence? Placement of the SLP doesn’t look too bad. 

A further offshore track of the ULL, the heaviest is always going to be just a bit to the NW of where that low tracks. Yesterday is was about 50 miles closer to the coast.

sketched_5ab17178d322c.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

For those cheerleading the 18z NAM, my point was that it has the same sharp cutoff that the Euro has to the North, except that it's a bit further North. And initially it didn't look like anything was going to make it North of the city at all, but luckily that changed.

If the NAM is even 30-40 miles too far North, nobody North of the city is seeing much of anything.

The 18z has actually backed amounts in northern sections and increased southern sections of Orange County from the 12z run. 12k nam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

My only concern TBH is that the Euro ensembles were so miserable.  Otherwise I would not bat an eye about the Op run

3k NAM is really far north.

This is a forecasters nightmare. However, this distribution looks amazingly similar to Jan 2016 on a lesser scale. Even with the Sharp cut off I was north of the band and got a consolation prize of 11.5 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

For those cheerleading the 18z NAM, my point was that it has the same sharp cutoff that the Euro has to the North, except that it's a bit further North. And initially it didn't look like anything was going to make it North of the city at all, but luckily that changed.

If the NAM is even 30-40 miles too far North, nobody North of the city is seeing much of anything.

Except your post made it seem like it was worse for the whole subforum.  Hence the reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...