Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,701
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sfagewi
    Newest Member
    Sfagewi
    Joined

March 20th-22nd Suppressed, Fish, Not Coming Threat


Rjay

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Capt. Adam said:

10:1 NAM maps are likely going to be very misleading.  As modeled and mentioned, there is a warm layer that will result in significant sleet for first half of storm at least.  Then factor in late March sun angle (might as well be September, remember) and accumulations can be further cut.  Factor in the NAM...frequently overdoing QPF...and you can take the Kuchera number, cut that by 50 pct, and you are probably in the ballpark of what would actually verify as accumulating snow if the NAM dynamics played out.

index.gif

Nam shows 6-10 with sleet and snow.

It will be cold enough for all areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The nam being so erratic has to be taken into consideration. Typically when it's right it locks on to a solution
The NAM being so high resolution is making it jump around imo. It's attempting to work out the details and the fact that it's resolution is so high can easily lead this to focus on one attribute one run and another minute attribute the next thus leading to the different scenarios.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

I doubt anyone uses this map

why ? ratio's have a good chance of being below 10:1 during at least part of the storm and also have to consider in any sleet that manages to fall in certain areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

I doubt anyone uses this map

It’s been pretty spot on for our marginal events March this year. Even when the 3k NAM was spitting out 1foot+ totals on 10:1 maps for the 5 boroughs the snow depth map was giving a more realistic 2-4 3-6.  

Trust me I don’t like using it but we kind of have no choice for March/April events at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stormlover74 said:

It's more accurate in this case IMO

It has nailed the (lack of) accumulating snow in Manhattan for the last 3 systems. It actually has overdone totals during those systems. :(

This would have been such an incredible stretch if we were in January or February, instead we've had these awesome systems that just don't stick to anything in the city. The last 2 storms both had periods where the snow started to stick for a brief period, and then washed off within an hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

I doubt anyone uses this map

That map looks realistic to me. Account for sleet and melting.

I know the airmass is colder this time around but we will need heavy rates for a long period of time to get any meaningful accumulation, will come down to another nowcast situation. If the city gets anything less than hours of heavy snow, it's going to be another disappointment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kat5hurricane said:

That map looks realistic to me. Account for sleet and melting.

I know the airmass is colder this time around but we will need heavy rates for a long period of time to get any meaningful accumulation, will come down to another nowcast situation. If the city gets anything less than hours of heavy snow, it's going to be another disappointment. 

If we’d been using that map this March we would all have gone through a lot less disappointment. Missing on 2-4 or 3-6 events doesn’t hit you as hard as seeing nada from 6-12...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kat5hurricane said:

That map looks realistic to me. Account for sleet and melting.

I know the airmass is colder this time around but we will need heavy rates for a long period of time to get any meaningful accumulation, will come down to another nowcast situation. If the city gets anything less than hours of heavy snow, it's going to be another disappointment. 

It depends on location. For coastal CT it has been way too low the past two storms. However I believe it has been more accurate for LI and the City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

the jet streak is still back in southern Georgia - would be tremendous lift up along the coast there. it's a huge hit.

I see what you're saying, it closes off in the perfect location. It's a really close call for the interior though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nycwinter said:

a few hours wins 1010 was thinking this storm was a miss maybe a inch or 2...on non paved surfaces.. they are always the last to come to the dinner table...

This had to be about 25 years ago, but 1010 wins was predicting three inches of snow.  A person called into the station and said we have more than three inches of snow on the roads right now.  I was in school at that point, so I didn't have time to listen after that, but it was still hysterical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...