Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,112
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

March 20th-22nd Suppressed, Fish, Not Coming Threat


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The 06z 3K NAM has less than .5 inches QPF from TTN southward through 00z Thursday. Absolutely insane 6 hour swing. Makes me wonder if there was some bad data ingested, either in the 00z or 6z run... that being said, it would fit the more early occlusion look of the Euro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 8:35 AM, Rjay said:

Calling @donsutherland1.  This isn't accurate but I'm way too tired to dig up your stats. 

Expand  

What’s not accurate?  Here’s the top five:

3/12-14/1888 = 20.9”

3/07-09/1941 = 18.1”

3/03-05/1960 = 14.6”

3/01-02/1914 = 14.5”

3/16-16/1896 = 12.0”

Number 10 = 3/02/1896 = 10.0”

4/03-04/1915 = 10.2” would be #10 if it’s March or later storms.  

EDIT: Here’s the link to resource used to tabulate list:

http://w2.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=okx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a crazy change from the NAM and you have to toss it for the moment.  The Euro has had a SE bias with the last few events so the NWS may be playing into that idea somewhat because even the ensembles would only argue for around 6 inches.  The totals they have look somewhat high but the NAM for now I think is a toss 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 8:49 AM, ncforecaster89 said:

What’s not accurate?  Here’s the top five:

3/12-14/1888 = 20.9”

3/07-09/1941 = 18.1”

3/03-05/1960 = 14.6”

3/01-02/1914 = 14.5”

3/16-16/1896 = 12.0”

Number 10 = 3/02/1896 = 10.0”

4/03-04/1915 = 10.2” would be #10 if it’s March or later storms.  

EDIT: Here’s the link to resource used to tabulate list:

http://w2.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=okx

Expand  

I posted this yesterday. Of course there are many March snowstorms greater than the ones I listed below and you listed them above. This was just the 8 biggest after the spring equinox. I think that's why some were confused.

There are only eight snowfalls of 6 inches or greater after the spring equinox in New York City. Also interesting to note here there have been 30 snowfalls 6 inches or greater in the month of March in New York City but only one between March 22 and March 31 but seven from April 1 through April 13. Just a curious weird anomaly. If it does happen on Wednesday it is more or less a one in twenty-year occurrence to happen in spring in New York City.

6 inch Spring Snowfalls in NYC

1.....10.2.....April 3-4, 1915
2.....10.0.....April 13, 1875
3.......9.6.....April 6, 1982
4.......9.0.....March 22, 1967
5.......8.5.....April 1, 1924
6.......6.5.....April 5, 1944
7.......6.5.....April 8-9, 1917
8.......6.4.....April 6-7, 1938

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 9:29 AM, doncat said:

Just seems that nws 12-18" forecast is very questionable regardless of which model you use or which run.

Expand  

That seems a little high IMO, at least for right now. Mt.Holly went a little less here, 8-14" which I think is more reasonable. I also don't think we should be so quick to toss the 06z NAM but it was a pretty wild swing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 9:31 AM, Rtd208 said:

That seems a little high IMO, at least for right now. Mt.Holly went a little less here, 8-14" which I think is more reasonable. I also don't think we should be so quick to toss the 06z NAM but it was a pretty wild swing.

Expand  

Most likely it over corrected SE. Considering non of the 6z guidance agrees with it but we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 9:52 AM, Snow88 said:
Could be noise
We will see but even Upton thinks the coast will be the favorites with the heaviest snow. I would have went with 6-12 instead of 12-16.
Upton has 12-18" for white plains... They see mixing at coast...

Obviously that was before the latest models.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/20/2018 at 9:53 AM, Snow88 said:
Gfs has support from the rgem Ukie and German.
Correct... but... NAM has been so much better than most this year... Especially over the last 3.

Hard to ignore it.

Next suite of models will be very telling.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...