WestminsterSnowCapitalMA Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Wow thats some solid DARK BLUE, JI should be pleased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 NAM looked a little better for DC? or no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 NAM trying with Wave 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: NAM looked a little better for DC? or no Looks like it backs off of precip, but it does still seem south. Wave 2 looks pretty interesting as per NAM as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: NAM looked a little better for DC? or no Seems to be a little better temp-wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, stormtracker said: NAM looked a little better for DC? or no NAM is out of range right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, stormtracker said: NAM looked a little better for DC? or no Its a tad south and colder, so yes. And yeah it seems to want to bring the second wave further north too. Too bad its the NAM, and out of range lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Too bad it's out of range & on the NAM. Would've been interesting to see how this played out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeathermanB Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Interstate said: NAM is out of range right? Well if more than 96 hours or so is out of range for the global models, why would the NAM at 72 hours be out of range? EDIT: We've seen the NAM change too much after say.. 48 hours, so NAM right now is out of range because it's near the end of the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Looks like it backs off of precip, but it does still seem south. Wave 2 looks pretty interesting as per NAM as well Did it though? Looked about the same (but perhaps that my novice eyes looking at the pretty colors, lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGolfBro Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Interstate said: NAM is out of range right? Unless it shows a hit. Then we consider it until one of the better models runs again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Just now, Maestrobjwa said: Did it though? Looked about the same (but perhaps that my novice eyes looking at the pretty colors, lol) It did yeah. Also a bit further south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said: Did it though? Looked about the same (but perhaps that my novice eyes looking at the pretty colors, lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, Interstate said: NAM is out of range right? yup. funny tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Kuchera is nice from DC northward though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, SnowGolfBro said: Unless it shows a hit. Then we consider it until one of the better models runs again You do? I don't. I mean, we are on a weather board though so I figured it was prudent to discuss a weather model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Lol NAM snows from hr 63 to 84 and of course still going. We just got NAM'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 20 minutes ago, Bob Chill said: Wave 1 precip mean is south of the op but u and I are in the .6+ contour. 1" is near EZF. The mean paints more of an insurance policy to the south as opposed to a liability to the north. I like that part. Op supercedes the ens at this point anyways but the biggrst risk for our yards is clearly rain/too north. Eps puts me at ease. Wave 2 is unconventional in general because we just don't normally do well with tight spacing like this with followups but the chance for amplification is no doubt slightly higher this run than the previous. Amazing we're only about 45 miles apart as the crow flies but your worried it goes north and I'm worried it stays south. Part of that is a function of how relatively narrow the significant (say 4"+) snows are likely to be with wave 1. With a shearing system entering confluence the heavy precip in the cold air is likely only a 50 mile wide area. If you get crushed I probably don't. That sucks. If we can somehow resurect the idea of a coastal redevelopment with a closed upper low we could all win. It was a step back towards that after it was all but dead last night. But we still need it more amplified there. The long range is crazy. This winter just won't die. If we don't score a win it's intent to tease and torture us to the absolute maximum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallen7908 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 3 chances: EPS snow chances for DC area / Mason-Dixon Line north of DC by 12Z Tuesday: 26/42% > 1" 02/12% > 3" 0/0% > 6" 0/0% > 12" by 12Z Wed: 68/74% > 1" 34/52% > 3" 12/34% >6" 0/6% > 12" by 12z Thu: 72/78% > 1" 48/54% > 3" 28/38% >6" 12/16% > 12" by 12z Sun: 80/82% > 1" 48/60% > 3" 32/44% > 6" 12/22% > 12" 0/2% > 24" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 That nam run looked fierce. Wave 2 is not a done deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 We are now at the point of parsing tiny shifts in every damn run. Guess that means everyone thinks it’s happening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 I really like the 18z NAM...trended colder for MBY and 0.75”+ of QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 19 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Ah, now I see it, lol That being said...the NAM's dry bias? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeathermanB Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 I also like the 18z NAM... doesn't go so absurd with snowfall IMBY unlike the 12z run today. Not safe to say that we actually pull out that much snow, because of the 10:1 ratio assumption. Ratios could very well be higher, if more cold air comes in. Best bet is that the ratios are probably gonna be 8:1 to 10:1. This winter really doesn't wanna obey climo right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxMan1 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, nj2va said: Overall 12z runs have been kind for DC....timing is pretty ideal and rates should be good. Would love a degree or two cooler though. As you alluded to...it's all about the rates! In the absence of advection, and assuming we've wetbulbed, any additional cooling will have to come from the heavier rates (melting term). It can happen folks, even during the day (not ideal obviously). Recall that southern VA into NC got widespread 2-4" during the day with the last system. Temps never got below 33 for some, yet the rates were so good that even the streets by 3-4 pm were starting to cave. If it can happen there last week, it can happen up here a week later. One thing I recall from the March 29, 1984 storm along with the St. Patrick's Day snow 4 years ago today -- the rates can overcome the sun angle until about 10 am; after that we can still accumulate on unpaved surfaces (though below, sometimes well below 10-1), however not so much on the pavement. If we can get the best rates before 13-14Z, I'm good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 13 minutes ago, H2O said: We are now at the point of parsing tiny shifts in every damn run. Guess that means everyone thinks it’s happening We parse differences at 384. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Having the model known to be way over amped at range look "perfect" doesn't inspire me. I want to see the globals look like the 12k nam did then I'll be happy. 3k looked south of 12k also at 60 hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeathermanB Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 GFS h5 vort enters California just a little bit earlier at 06z Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 This please please please. Just once can the crazy drunk uncle member be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psurulz Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 PSU,is that from the earlier Euro run? If so, we've already decided that it's e39 and winter is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.