Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

I dont care anymore....I am starting a storm thread for March 20-21. Got nothing to lose.


Ji

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, WVclimo said:

Does any of the precip from the 2nd wave on the EPS make it out this way (HGR-MRB-OKV) ?  Until now, I have been pulling for the best slug of precip possible with the first wave and hoping for temps to cooperate, because even the models that have keyed on the follow-up have mostly kept QPF south/ east of here. 

Sure does dude. Mean qpf is only slightly worse than my yard. Plenty of 1-2" qpf solutions in the mix and a big step from 12z

TaPNeva.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, WeatherShak said:

Serious question.  When is the last time the CMC verified for a legit storm for us?  Thank you.  

I suppose it depends on what you mean by "us". If you're talking about the DC-Baltimore region, then when's the last time we had a legit storm?  ;)

Of course the CMC often verifies when the models agree.  But if you mean when's the last time the CMC out-verified the GFS and Euro, it's happened already several times this season.  Most recently on 03/12.  I just added the write-up to the model discusison thread, starting here.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic/50849-winter-model-performance-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=4890898

Of course that doesn't mean it's going to do well this time, but it does happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More so than where that initial vort ends up it seems like the gfs is a little more neutral with that main southern stream piece (wave 2).  The other models seem to want to lift the trough sooner.  That’s the quick and dirty I can see with 6z.  With the blocking in place and recent steering of systems off the coast I don’t think that idea is off the table, but it is kind of in a smaller camp now with that.  I have a feeling 12z will start building some consensus on how those pieces from that west coast energy reorganize as they move east.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, showmethesnow said:

Just a couple of days ago I preferred the slow strong initial low off the coast waiting for wave two and the 500's to catch up. But over the last two days with the changes I have seen on the models I no longer feel that is a higher odds win for us. I think the more likely scenario that plays out if we see that is that to the NE of us once again cashes in while we are left fighting over the scraps that they care to throw under the table for us. But let's see where the models take us. Have a feel they aren't done evolving yet.

We will find out soon. I realized I've been saying something misleading though. We don't actually need a "strong" wave 1. We need a slow wave 1. Plenty of the hits are anemic with wave 1 but they are slow allowing the next wave to catch up and phase. There is no escape then redevelopment. So a weak wave 1 can work if it slows and waits then amplifies and comes up. Basically less energy escapes east. Some can but only a small amount. If the while wave runs off i see no way this works. 

34 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

The most important piece of guidance that keeps improving is the eps. The wave 2 idea continues to gain momentum. Getting close to the 1" mean qpf contour (dca officially in it) and that keeps going up every run. How on earth can that be interpreted any other way than things keep looking better. Even though it's a scrape, the euro op has precip for wave 2 with 0z when it had nada at 12z. This S is getting fun 

I'm not convinced this fails just way less optimistic then others. And my comments are specific to north of 70 in MD. I said I'd be way happier with where you are right now. My biggest issue is just with how to get there. The EPS also trended towards a better wave 2. But if you look at north MD the only solutions that get heavy snow up here in the EPS age ones that have a slow wave 1 that phases. The escape then redevelop idea only works D.C. South. None pull that off up here for the reasons I listed earlier. So D.C. I think can work with either scenario. Up here I think we need wave 1 to slow down and phase like the cmc and those gefs and EPS members.  the euro op was in between. It allowed some of wave 1 to escape but held enough back to get a mediocre result. So it was workable. Slight improvement from that and we all win. I'm 50/50 on this right now. But I'm just making my case for why giving up on wave one or wanting to see it race out isn't a great idea for anyone north of Baltimore. We need the cmc idea of how this evolves. There is enough support from the geps gefs and some with the EPS to think that option is still viable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WeathermanB said:

NAM 12k is just starting to initialize, wonder what it has in store for 12z...

Wave 1 is all about temps and p type at this point.  That initial wave is gaining consistency. For wave 2 I’m looking at the southern stream. I think we want that to tilt negative sooner than what the gfs is depicting.  That may allow better phasing with the trailing NS energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, showmethesnow said:

Thanks. There are some monsters in there especially for northern Md. 1-2 feet +. 

No problem, but all the caveats about the GEPS at short range apply.  The REPS will probably be more informative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing i am confident on, whilst Delaware might miss wave 1 because of p-type issues, wave 2 could save us and give a snow dump. After all, it is a little north this run, so DC and north could very well get into the action as well. However, it is not set in stone just yet. Give a couple more model runs, and build the consensus further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...