Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

March 12th - 13th The It's Not Coming Storm Part 2


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just to review:

 

EURO: 979 about 150 miles east of the BM

NAVGEM: 971 at the BM (weird/encouraging given the SE bias)

NAM 12Z : 969 just south of the BM

GFS: 966 about 100 miles east of the BM

RGEM: 972 about 50 miles east of the BM

ICON: 973 about 30 miles east of the BM

 

Things could be much worse 30 hours before a storm is set to start for the eastern 2/3 of the forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mikem81 said:

Just to review:

 

EURO: 979 about 150 miles east of the BM

NAVGEM: 971 at the BM (weird/encouraging given the SE bias)

NAM 12Z : 969 just south of the BM

GFS: 966 about 100 miles east of the BM

RGEM: 972 about 50 miles east of the BM

ICON: 973 about 30 miles east of the BM

 

Things could be much worse 30 hours before a storm is set to start for the eastern 2/3 of the forum

Meaning much less snow. Correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

The other two could have also

 

18 minutes ago, snow1 said:

This storm could’ve been such a huge one for us. Sucks that it’s going to the east of us

Ummmmm this storm didn’t happen yet. I think the deform band sets right over New York City for 5 hours straight!

 

anthony any word on the sref ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, swataz said:

I'm not saying Upton is wrong, I'm saying based on all the banter in this thread am I missing something?

You can read each office's Area Forecast Discussion (links: OKX, ALY, PHI) for the reasoning behind their forecasts. Upton weighed the 12z Euro less heavily because of "differences noted in shortwave progression." As it stands, most of us would consider the NWS forecasts for this storm to be very aggressive in light of the data at our disposal, but no responsible poster would explicitly tell you to ignore official forecasts and hazard statements. For better or worse, the NWS doesn't have as much freedom as we do in responding to model shifts, so if guidance continues to look less impressive, it would take them a while to stand down from the snowier cycles of last night and this morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...