Baroclinic Zone Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 GFS.....the forum west of I-95.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 We should start stabilizing at h5 soon which indicates the nw halt has been capped. Sound the alarms out east, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: We should start stabilizing at h5 soon which indicates the nw halt has been capped. Sound the alarms out east, though. 18z tomorrow. Our canadian energy actually gets into a decent sampling area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Mid level gfs is tasty actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 The southern shortwave was actually pretty robust this run. That is what I initially saw early in the run. It was the northern energy that wasn't as sharp, hence the more rounded turn. The fact that the southern s/w is looking good is a good thing, considering it was over Wyoming at 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 The GFS is NW of the 12k NAM but weaker. It seems that the earlier arrival shown by the 3k NAM has the better solution than the GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said: The GFS is NW of the 12k NAM but weaker. It seems that the earlier arrival shown by the 3k NAM has the better solution than the GFS. You’re right about the euro and 3k timing-didn’t notice that. Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I can't even find a town where the northern s/w is located at 18z. Fort Simpson? lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Simpson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 47 minutes ago, NorEastermass128 said: Low astronomical tides right? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 11 minutes ago, christhesnowman said: Do u have any idea how to look at a model? Green=precip do u? seems not, go back to reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 15 minutes ago, weathafella said: I’d wait for more evidence on that....lol. I don't see what's better about the this run, less qpf, low further out.. less snow.. etc etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Early thoughts moderate powdery snow 6 to 12 outside 95 128, Stout heavy snow inside with a foot plus to the coast. OuterCape blizzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, Bostonseminole said: I don't see what's better about the this run, less qpf, low further out.. less snow.. etc etc.. Well I interpreted your post to be a general trend vs just GFS. I thought with that mid level look we should have had more qpf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: Early thoughts moderate powdery snow 6 to 12 outside 95 128, Stout heavy snow inside with a foot plus to the coast. OuterCape blizzard I’d bring 6-12 NYC - ALB axis 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, weathafella said: Well I interpreted your post to be a general trend vs just GFS. I thought with that mid level look we should have had more qpf. all models improved during the past few cycles, this was the first time one went the other way, that's all, not saying storm cancelled, still lots of moving pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: I’d bring 6-12 NYC - ALB axis Nice I don't think that's out of the question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: I’d bring 6-12 NYC - ALB axis you're just trying to keep me from being sad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTWeatherFreak Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 9 minutes ago, JC-CT said: I can't even find a town where the northern s/w is located at 18z. Fort Simpson? lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Simpson Looks awfully desolate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: Nice I don't think that's out of the question >6 inch probs EPS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bostonseminole said: all models improved during the past few cycles, this was the first time one went the other way, that's all, not saying storm cancelled, still lots of moving pieces. Shouldn't this type of system be an easy call for the GFS inside of 72 hours? If it fails this one, perhaps they need to look again at the changes made in the "improved" version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBinStoughton Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Nice I don't think that's out of the question What’s that based on? Not this GFS certainly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongBeachSurfFreak Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 7 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: I’d bring 6-12 NYC - ALB axis Agreed, how many times have we seen the best banding set up well Nw of the forecast!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Amazingly the 12 inch progs are higher than the last storm 84 out 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 12 minutes ago, Bostonseminole said: do u? seems not, go back to reading. Everyone knows blue = snow and green = rain. What was he thinking? 9 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Early thoughts moderate powdery snow 6 to 12 outside 95 128, Stout heavy snow inside with a foot plus to the coast. OuterCape blizzard I agree, I think right now, caveat obviously could change (not for you), the consensus of best available guidance is what you describe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, JBinStoughton said: What’s that based on? Not this GFS certainly. I think I answered your question 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: Amazingly the 12 inch progs are higher than the last storm 84 out Thermals, especially in the BL, are far better than the last go-around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 To my untrained eye 18z GGEM looks better and stalled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: I think I answered your question Uncertainty really makes some people uncomfortable. Not the hobby to be involved in then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, JC-CT said: Uncertainly really makes some people uncomfortable. Not the hobby to be involved in then. By saying it's not out of the question I implied probability, hope people understood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now