Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,610
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

March 13th ... west Atlantic bombogenesis type low clipping SE New England, more certain ...may be expanding inland


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

woah...is that a free or pay site? this is cool (no pun intended)

Doesn’t look much different from your bufkit ones. That IJD image is awesome. 30 microbars smack in the middle of the DGZ. 10-15ubars is pretty decent too. That GFS one for IJD is a little meh. I’ll agree on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Weenie said:

Cranky is saying that the fact that the trof is sweeping and not digging and the fact that the low is racing ENE means that the Eastern guidance will win out. What does the forum think?

Every other post for 5 days has been “low and away” or east this east that.

It’s weird, especially in the face of current guidance 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Doesn’t look much different from your bufkit ones. That IJD image is awesome. 30 microbars smack in the middle of the DGZ. 10-15ubars is pretty decent too. That GFS one for IJD is a little meh. I’ll agree on that. 

IJD certainly looks real solid. I think my concern with this back across CT is just how to forecast this b/c this is really all about the banding here and there is going to be some crazy gradients. Determining where the band sets up, how narrow/wide the band is, and how it propagates determines what we see. I think outside of the band there will be issues with good snow rates/snow growth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Every other post for 5 days has been “low and away” or east this east that.

It’s weird, especially in the face of current guidance 

I don't recall Captain Smith jumping into the first available lifeboat.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Every other post for 5 days has been “low and away” or east this east that.

It’s weird, especially in the face of current guidance 

Meh, conviction sometimes overrides evidence. I'm more interested to see how he backpedals if he's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cranky means well, he is just slanted this storm because he guessed wrong, the storm is not moving east, if anything it is slowing down to a crawl currently as modeled way south of the benchmark, bands are already on our doorstep but we have pretty high dew point depressions to overcome before snow starts around 12am, latest GFS all snow, the latest HRRR is all snow to start a little mix with rain at the brunt of the storm passing to our east.  This is a cold storm, a cold atmosphere, everywhere I look the 850mb temps are around -6C to -12C, 925mb a little warmer than that, but the boundary layer issues will be overcome in the first few hours of heavy snows, as they occur before sunrise and planting a nice sound foundation of snow on the pavement will offset the warm sun angle non sense in March.  Also heavy snowfall rates could exceed 2"/hour maybe eclipse the Blizzard of 2005 in terms of heavy snowfall rates we received on Cape in that blizzard, and longevity of the bands could rival the 2015 Blizzard, in terms of ferocity, this storm will beat out those two any day of the week, with a pressure as low as 962mb in some regards to modeling as it passes east of Chatham, MA we could be looking at feet of snow accumulating over the Cape Cod and Dukes county.  Blizzard warning, I think NWS is conservative still, latest 18z GFS had no problems in my estimation, it brought almost 30" of snow to Cape Cod, with the 40-60" max just east of the Outer Cape.  Hurricane force wind gust likely 70-80mph is likely on the outer Cape and Nantucket.  This is the beast we measure all our snow by, the benchmark storm is coming, I can feel it in the air outside the house, it is rocking from the ENE and the air is cooling rapidly along with moistening rapidly

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...