Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,126
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

March 13th ... west Atlantic bombogenesis type low clipping SE New England, more certain ...may be expanding inland


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/12/2018 at 8:12 PM, JC-CT said:

always thought that was just a RAP prog

Expand  

part of the equation

The SPC runs a comprehensive surface objective analysis scheme called SFCOA. The system runs at the top of each hour, using the latest 40km RAP forecast grids as a first guess. Next, the surface data is merged with the latest RAP forecast/analysis upper-air data to represent a 3-dimensional current objective analysis. Finally, each gridpoint is post-processed with a sounding analysis routine called NSHARP to calculate many technical diagnostic fields related to severe storms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2018 at 8:15 PM, Ginx snewx said:

part of the equation

The SPC runs a comprehensive surface objective analysis scheme called SFCOA. The system runs at the top of each hour, using the latest 40km RAP forecast grids as a first guess. Next, the surface data is merged with the latest RAP forecast/analysis upper-air data to represent a 3-dimensional current objective analysis. Finally, each gridpoint is post-processed with a sounding analysis routine called NSHARP to calculate many technical diagnostic fields related to severe storms.

Expand  

Thanks steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2018 at 8:19 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Not trusting a nammy placement of a deform band, call me crazy.

Expand  

How can anybody say for certain where it will set up. The storm really hasn’t even come together yet.  The point is there probably will be significant mid level features. Shifts are obviously possible and even as the storm moves along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2018 at 8:03 PM, JC-CT said:

Appreciate the guidance, would you mind explaining a bit?

Expand  

Well the satellite has different bands with different wavelengths that measure wv at different levels. I think the rule of thumb was that the more typically used wv images showed you wv around the 600mb level. I haven’t gotten enough into GOES-R to know what micrometer wavelengths they use for their lower, mid, and upper wv maps. I think the mid trop one is 6.9um. Plus there’s the fact you’re comparing vorticity to water vapor. I’m just not sure I would be hyperscrutinizing the two looking for comparisons or model error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/12/2018 at 8:22 PM, dendrite said:

Well the satellite has different bands with different wavelengths that measure wv at different levels. I think the rule of thumb was that the more typically used wv images showed you wv around the 600mb level. I haven’t gotten enough into GOES-R to know what micrometer wavelengths they use for their lower, mid, and upper wv maps. I think the mid trop one is 6.9um. Plus there’s the fact you’re comparing vorticity to water vapor. I’m just not sure I would be hyperscrutinizing the two looking for comparisons or model error.

Expand  

Ok thanks. bun me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...