Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,874
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Andywenie
    Newest Member
    Andywenie
    Joined

March 7 Disc/Observations


nj2va

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/6/2018 at 3:58 PM, Amped said:

GFS says all WSW along I95 will bust.  The 6" snow depth change is like 50 miles NW.

Expand  

The GFS is a torch down low, but we don't have to go back more than a couple of weeks to have an example of where the low-level thermal profiles were terrible on the GFS.  Again, take ALL snow maps with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 4:03 PM, MN Transplant said:

The GFS is a torch down low, but we don't have to go back more than a couple of weeks to have an example of where the low-level thermal profiles were terrible on the GFS.  Again, take ALL snow maps with a grain of salt.

Expand  

GFS sucks with thermals in setups like this. It gets schooled time and time again in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 3:58 PM, Amped said:

GFS says all WSW along I95 will bust.  The 6" snow depth change is like 50 miles NW.

Expand  

I don’t think the snow depth map is the right one to look at. Kuchera if you can find it is probably best. 

  On 3/6/2018 at 4:01 PM, Amped said:

I'd say it looks like the NAM with less blobs. The surface and 500 track are about the same.

Expand  

NAM is designed to see those mesoscale features like the “surprise” deathband over Hoffman’s house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 4:03 PM, MN Transplant said:

The GFS is a torch down low, but we don't have to go back more than a couple of weeks to have an example of where the low-level thermal profiles were terrible on the GFS.  Again, take ALL snow maps with a grain of salt.

Expand  

Yeah, I wouldn’t buy the gfs thermal profiles but the surface low jumped pretty far inland on this run to screw our friends to the northeast along 95. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 4:03 PM, MN Transplant said:

The GFS is a torch down low, but we don't have to go back more than a couple of weeks to have an example of where the low-level thermal profiles were terrible on the GFS.  Again, take ALL snow maps with a grain of salt.

Expand  

Yea I can see there being a few more with rates and dynamic cooling.  8-12" forecast in the urban corridor are still in deep **** if the GFS and NAM are anywhere close.  I can see the higher elevations 50 miles NW getting there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 4:09 PM, Amped said:

Yea I can see there being a few more with rates and dynamic cooling.  8-12" forecast in the urban corridor are still in deep **** if the GFS and NAM are anywhere close.  I can see the higher elevations 50 miles NW getting there.

Expand  

I have never seen that forecast for the DC-Balt area for this, where are you getting that from? That doesn't sound like a real thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 3:49 PM, psuhoffman said:

I finally remembered which storm this reminds me of a lot. Feb 5 2001. Also a Nina year. Also a late developing coastal system. Similar h5 track. I know it's not perfect. No 2 storms are exact but this is close imo. 

H5 and surface were pretty close  

IMG_4506.GIF.b4cd3f83c020946831534ad4c6002937.GIFIMG_4507.GIF.dad3bba2e16944390af6c86ee04f8816.GIFIMG_4508.GIF.41916538a4607f84c4a3a6ca01368a03.GIF

this storm looks more amplified a bit 

and radar...

the WAA precip in front 

IMG_4509.GIF.5f9b5534a9c585c2f4e995141333f012.GIF

then the ccb develops 

IMG_4510.GIF.67f9b6dcbc943aa8e480fecded45573a.GIFIMG_4511.GIF.c8a1c8df81916adbda60757d0c7320df.GIF

the results...north of Baltimore would be happy with a repeat.  It was 7" here according to local coop.

IMG_4505.JPG.0bfd9e7b769ad20d23513b5b90eee540.JPG

 

Expand  

I recorded 6.5"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 5:21 PM, mappy said:

like what??? ... sorry, you got my attention with exploding ordnance

Expand  

Its ordinance. They are testing it on various structures. Honestly that's all the email said. I don't know anymore. But Its shaking the entire building. I am not personally doing it. Can't you imagine that? I'd blow myself up. LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/6/2018 at 5:15 PM, Mdecoy said:

I saw it too. I think it is.

We are currently exploding stuff on base too.

Expand  

 

  On 3/6/2018 at 5:28 PM, PhineasC said:

They blow stuff up here and sometimes it starts little fires, or sometimes they start little fires on purpose to prevent larger fires from starting (clearing dry brush).

Expand  

You both work at the Proving Ground? Uncle used to work there years ago. Always a cool place to visit when I was a kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...