Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,702
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    MDSnow93
    Newest Member
    MDSnow93
    Joined

March 7th 2018 Coastal Storm thread (not obs)


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, friedmators said:

wheres @donsutherland1. I am sure he has stats for the biggest busts of all times going back to the Cretaceous.

The 1989 storm was an incredible bust. Looking further back, the January 19-20, 1978 storm was a huge positive bust (forecast was heavy rain, but the outcome was heavy snow across much of the region, ending in some drizzle).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only real negative aspect that I see with the Euro, and a trend that has occured with some of the other guidance today, is that the SLP doesn't deepen all that much. Looks like 991mb is about as low as it gets, where yesterday a lot of guidance had it sub 990mb. I mean it's not a huge difference and it's actually going to mean less wind, which is good, and higher ratios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Neblizzard said:

Now we have a true model war.  The EURO hasn’t budged and is an ideal track for NYC.

It's not just an ideal track for NYC, I hate when people post that as if it's the only location that matters here. The Euro is an ideal track for just about the entire sub-forum outside of the twin forks, and even they don't do half bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NJwx85 said:

It's not just an ideal track for NYC, I hate when people post that as if it's the only location that matters here. The Euro is an ideal track for just about the entire sub-forum outside of the twin forks, and even they don't do half bad.

Sorry I should of named every location where it’s an ideal track , Jeez.   My point was the entire NYC metro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blizzard-on-GFS said:

Is this mostly snow for CNJ around the trenton area? The other models have the area kissing the rain/snow line and it’s hard to tell from the EURO panels. 

Yeah on the Euro a lot of that in CNJ would be snow, but I have to caution you that it's East of the model consensus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJwx85 said:

Yeah on the Euro a lot of that in CNJ would be snow, but I have to caution you that it's East of the model consensus. 

Thank you. However it’s in agreement with the CMC, HRDPS, and Ukie. So this solution has a few models in its camp. This is a really hard forecast for I-95. It could honestly go either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

The only real negative aspect that I see with the Euro, and a trend that has occured with some of the other guidance today, is that the SLP doesn't deepen all that much. Looks like 991mb is about as low as it gets, where yesterday a lot of guidance had it sub 990mb. I mean it's not a huge difference and it's actually going to mean less wind, which is good, and higher ratios.

i see 987 on wxbell map @ 36

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great run, still, for 95, but the precip axis has moved NW about 25-30 miles and surface temps at the height of the storm are 1-2F warmer for 95 and the coast, so areas towards the NJ coast and on eastern LI do much worse for this run vs. 00Z and 95 is very close to rain.  I can see maps but can't post them, but it's clear from comparing the last two runs.  Any further move NW and the 95 corridor from Phiilly to NYC will be in trouble.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...