Drz1111 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 GFS soundings also will underestimate dynamic cooling because of the model resolution / parameterization. It’s not going to pick up on the mesoscale lift, and will underestimate the cooling effect of melting precip because it can’t model convective banding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drz1111 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Also will likely underestimate the ageostrophic flow for a tightly wound system. but other than that the sounding is dead on balls accurate. ps, even if it is accurate that’s a snow sounding. Wet snow, but snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherbear5 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 5 minutes ago, weatherlogix said: um yeah...been doing this a while... Didn't mean to come across as condescending, if I did so I apologize. Overall though, that is probably Snow, maybe mixed with a bit of rain but predominantly snow. in terms of the rest of the storm, CMC looks nice for a large part of the forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, weatherbear5 said: Didn't mean to come across as condescending, if I did so I apologize. Overall though, that is probably Snow, maybe mixed with a bit of rain but predominantly snow. in terms of the rest of the storm, CMC looks nice for a large part of the forum no worries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metasequoia Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 00Z GFS looks better for NYC than 18Z regarding snow maps. I am having trouble uploading files, otherwise I'd prove my point. Folks are freaking out needlessly. We haven't had a bad run in quite a while...if your NYC west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 According the SNE thread the CMC at 48 hours crushes this area... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongBeachSurfFreak Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 15 minutes ago, weatherpruf said: I don't think this is that kind of category, and anyway last year was supposed to be historic and well, ya know....superstorm March 93 sleeted for hours, that kept us under a foot, but yeah it was a big daddy of a storm nonetheless. This puppy isn't in the category of those storms. What can we do about it anyway? Your impossible 12”+ March storm is incomming. You look to be in a good spot for this one. The only area that will struggle is way down on the Jersey shore and eastern LI. The biggest totals of well over a foot will be in areas above 500’ NW and NE of the city where ratios will be better do to colder temps. The extreme SS aka jm. May struggle for a bit too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tornadocane Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 OMG I wish this event was happening up in Paramus when I lived up there. The models are going to bust on the high side. Cold air is readily available. This event is most likely going to start at 3-4 am for NYC west and last for 30 hours - 16 hours of which is going to feature 1-4 inches of snow. Someone is going to lollipop in the 24+" range around central northern New Jersey through the Hudson Valley into Connecticut. That primary low is pulling subtropical moisture into cold air Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherbear5 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Ultimately the coast's fate seems to be dependent on how much latitude this gets before that eastward shift occurs. It will be close, at the very least too close for comfort unfortunately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said: Your impossible 12”+ March storm is incomming. You look to be in a good spot for this one. The only area that will struggle is way down on the Jersey shore and eastern LI. The biggest totals of well over a foot will be in areas above 500’ NW and NE of the city where ratios will be better do to colder temps. The extreme SS aka jm. May struggle for a bit too Hey, I never said impossible.....there was March 1888 ya know....and 8 other storms IIRC over a 100 year period....still don't think it will be a foot though. Will wear a weenie hat if it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, weatherlogix said: According the SNE thread the CMC at 48 hours crushes this area... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 QPF accross the 00z suite has generally increased, it'll be interesting to see of this continues... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said: Your impossible 12”+ March storm is incomming. You look to be in a good spot for this one. The only area that will struggle is way down on the Jersey shore and eastern LI. The biggest totals of well over a foot will be in areas above 500’ NW and NE of the city where ratios will be better do to colder temps. The extreme SS aka jm. May struggle for a bit too We’re definitely not out of the woods down here for a last minute warm trend. So far so good on the guidance but the coast is still cutting it close. The GFS has the 700/850 low crossing right off the beach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 that "low resolution" model did pretty good on temp profiles last week....The gfs was horrific with temperature profiles last weekSent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, weatherbear5 said: Ultimately the coast's fate seems to be dependent on how much latitude this gets before that eastward shift occurs. It will be close, at the very least too close for comfort unfortunately Yeah, I hate the term nowcast but with taint so close it's applicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherbear5 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Rjay said: A lot of these colder models are showing a rush-hour disaster in the making... it would be terrible, dumping snow right around rush hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 According the SNE thread the CMC at 48 hours crushes this area...Yes it does. The CMC would give most of us some of the most intense rates we have ever seen. It is essentially tropical convection in the form of snow. Though at first glance, it may not be quite the rates the 3k Nam is progging for some areas. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metasequoia Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, USCG RS said: The gfs was horrific with temperature profiles last week Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Yeah. GFS busted high on temps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncat Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Models are in excellent agreement concerning qpf...generally 1.50" plus a bit...Great potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tornadocane Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Just now, USCG RS said: Yes it does. The CMC would give most of us some of the most intense rates we have ever seen. It is essentially tropical convection in the form of snow. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Yes. Yes. Its literally pullling subtropical moisture into the area while arctic air is sitting a couple thousand feet above the area. The great lakes primary low is pulling the coastal low towards NE NJ and, all of a sudden, the West Atlantic low saves the day by pulling the low ENE toward Nantucket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, USCG RS said: Yes it does. The CMC would give most of us some of the most intense rates we have ever seen. It is essentially tropical convection in the form of snow. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk 4-6"/hr. No biggie. Lol could've been 80 the day before and if those rates verified roads would be in shambles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, doncat said: Models are in excellent agreement concerning qpf...generally 1.50" plus a bit...Great potential. And ticking up as we go, let's see how insane guidance can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tornadocane Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Ericjcrash said: 4-6"/hr. No biggie. Lol could've been 80 the day before and if those rates verified roads would be in shambles. Its March. The cold air isn't that cold. 1-4" (2-4" during the heaviest part) is gonna happen. I'll guaran-damn-tee thundersnow. But it ain't gonna pile up at 6" an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 4-6"/hr. No biggie. Lol could've been 80 the day before and if those rates verified roads would be in shambles.I live out in Suffolk and experienced the full wrath of Nemo (Feb 2013 blizzard). I remember working an ems shift and seeing over six inches of snow on William Floyd after approximately 80 min. This storm (VERBATIM on the rgem and 3k Nam) could not only be more widespread with those types of snows, it could potentially surpass the rates. That's - from an emergency manager perspective - rather disconcerting if I'm being honest. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin1926 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 5 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said: 4-6"/hr. No biggie. Lol could've been 80 the day before and if those rates verified roads would be in shambles. It's 4 to 6 mm per hour according to the legend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 minute ago, USCG RS said: I live out in Suffolk and experienced the full wrath of Nemo (Feb 2013 blizzard). I remember working an ems shift and seeing over six inches of snow on William Floyd after approximately 80 min. This storm (VERBATIM on the rgem and 3k Nam) could not only be more widespread with those types of snows, it could potentially surpass the rates. That's - from an emergency manager perspective - rather frightening if I'm being honest. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk We weren't supposed to see much from Nemo out my way, and we ended up getting some heavy bands for some reason and wound up with a general 6-8+ with CP doing 11 I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 Waiting on the Quebec view but the Ukie looks tucked. Still in line with the other guidance though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Just now, Berlin1926 said: It's 4 to 6 mm per hour according to the legend? That’s about 0.2” per hour (one inch is about 25.4mm). Crazy but that wouldn’t be 4” per hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tornadocane Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, jm1220 said: That’s about 0.2” per hour (one inch is about 25.4mm). Crazy but that wouldn’t be 4” per hour. .2" an hour is equivalent to 2" inches of snow per hour. But given the dynamics, it could be 2-3" of snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.