WinterWolf Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:09 PM, WintersComing said: Uggh. Hate to see Ryan’s station fall into the windshield wiper effect. Just cut their totals . Expand What? No they didn’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:13 PM, jbenedet said: My take is the track inland towards ACY makes sense, but GFS beyond that point is questionable. I think the euro handling of the kick east is superior. Basically the track I put out yesterday afternoon is a 50/50 blend of the 6z GFS and the 0z Euro, and that’s what I still think will verify. 6z GFS is also weakest solution so it’s a worst case scenario for the subforum. I think it’s OTL intensity wise. Expand Because the system sort of occludes the kick into NJ is worse than it would ordinarily be. Typically we would get pounded here once the kick east occurs as would most of CT but because the semi occlusion the back edge probably dies as that low kicks out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:14 PM, CT Rain said: We did?Sorry didn’t mean cut back. My bad. Should have said bumped everything west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 so glad i won't be glued to this today as i am very busy....i will check in later its kinda all about tomorrow as next weeks event looks wet....playing with fire here at this point in the season without arctic air reading box discussion there are even more flags....valley down sloping etc which i thought might not be as bad this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:06 PM, JC-CT said: Euro gets 0 weight? Expand Cranky old lady at it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Just not buying that GFS run. Hate to see it come back at 12 z and then have to bump or slide back over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:18 PM, WintersComing said: Sorry didn’t mean cut back. My bad. Should have said bumped everything west . Expand I think we actually increased totals. The 8-14 contour got dragged south into coastal Fairfield co. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:12 PM, JC-CT said: GFS is like 20 miles west at most of other guidance. Expand GEFS also had the last storm going over Poughkeepsie at one point and several cycles into eastern CT. Not exactly reliable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 If we are going to knit pick, I believe Darren has the 4-8'' line way to north and west. He will need to adjust that imo to the south/southeast. No way Naugatuck line and some 10 miles southeast of them have a minimum of 4'' only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:19 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Cranky old lady at it again. Expand Your defense mechanism of calling me names every time I disagree with something or point out something you didn't consider is getting old fast. I call it like it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:19 PM, codfishsnowman said: so glad i won't be glued to this today as i am very busy....i will check in later its kinda all about tomorrow as next weeks event looks wet....playing with fire here at this point in the season without arctic air reading box discussion there are even more flags....valley down sloping etc which i thought might not be as bad this time Expand ??? BOX has you 12"+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:22 PM, Hoth said: GEFS also had the last storm going over Poughkeepsie at one point and several cycles into eastern CT. Not exactly reliable. Expand 70/30 euro/gfs & nam blend is the way to go. Prob leads to a UK type look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:23 PM, JC-CT said: Your defense mechanism of calling me names every time I disagree with something or point out something you didn't consider is getting old fast. I call it like it is. Expand See post above. Your nitpicking posts gets old fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:19 PM, codfishsnowman said: so glad i won't be glued to this today as i am very busy....i will check in later its kinda all about tomorrow as next weeks event looks wet....playing with fire here at this point in the season without arctic air reading box discussion there are even more flags....valley down sloping etc which i thought might not be as bad this time Expand It gon' rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:16 PM, SnowGoose69 said: Because the system sort of occludes the kick into NJ is worse than it would ordinarily be. Typically we would get pounded here once the kick east occurs as would most of CT but because the semi occlusion the back edge probably dies as that low kicks out Expand I don’t really see it dying out per se. There’s a lot of vorticity in that trough. To my mind the phasing happens more gradually —due to the Cut off low near the Lakes —rather than all at once so the system remains in a quasi-steady state intensity-wise as it kicks east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:19 PM, codfishsnowman said: so glad i won't be glued to this today as i am very busy....i will check in later its kinda all about tomorrow as next weeks event looks wet....playing with fire here at this point in the season without arctic air reading box discussion there are even more flags....valley down sloping etc which i thought might not be as bad this time Expand You need to move...plain and simple! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:25 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: See post above. Your nitpicking posts gets old fast. Expand The euro isn't 12-18 north and west of the river. South and west maybe, in your hood. It is not that much qpf for the berks area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 From GYX: The 06.00z GFS is the only model that continues to warm the lowest 2 km until after 06z Thu...reaching as high as +3 to 4C. All other model guidance pins wet bulb temps just above 0C near the coast and holds them there until after 00z Thu...when temps begin to fall in the truly heavy precip. Given that temps aloft are plenty cold and heavy precip will be moving in...my preference is to ignore the GFS low level thermal profile in favor of the rest of the guidance...including what was available of the high-res NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:26 PM, JC-CT said: The euro isn't 12-18 north and west of the river. South and west maybe, in your hood. It is not that much qpf for the berks area. Expand You stick with qpf and surface maps. See how far that gets you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Day before a storm is always fun around here lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Think it’s always been a safe call that most of CT sees 6-12 little bit less maybe far SE. I’m sure we’ll see but higher amounts 84 and west. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:26 PM, JC-CT said: The euro isn't 12-18 north and west of the river. South and west maybe, in your hood. It is not that much qpf for the berks area. Expand NWS BOX and Albany wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 If all anyone did is use euro qpf and vendor clown maps to forecast big east coast snowstorms past several years, they’d look very bad. Jan 15, Jan 16, Mar 17, and even this past Friday toa lesser extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:32 PM, HIPPYVALLEY said: NWS BOX and Albany wrong? Expand I dunno what hes trying to accomplish. I see 12-18” out west in many forecasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 What did rgem have at 6z? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:41 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: What did rgem have at 6z? Expand Tucky, but would be a good solution for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 11:57 AM, CT Rain said: Kevin’s on the verge of a meltdown after the 6z runs. Slot risk for Tolland! Expand I’ll stick with the EPS/ Euro / Ukie/ Reggie suite thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:45 PM, CoastalWx said: Tucky, but would be a good solution for you. Expand And the rest of SNE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx2fish Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/6/2018 at 12:45 PM, CoastalWx said: Tucky, but would be a good solution for you. Expand Tucked but alot colder than the gfs. More realistic imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 I like the evolution of systems with regionwide hits. Sure I want as much as I can get, to maximize a storm. But I am also a giver, a sharer of snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.