Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,885
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Dalon7302
    Newest Member
    Dalon7302
    Joined

Median to above confidence for moderate (major?) impact event, midweek


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here is the total qpf from the 12Z GFS.  There was a bit of talk last night about how the GFS over amps precip over terrain areas.  I am always in the qpf hole in my location (marked with an X) and it drives me nuts.  Seems like the Worcester hills also get more precip but maybe that is correct with rising relief.  Up in my hood it makes it really hard for me to determine what my qpf will be with areas around me almost always modeled to get more.

Untitled.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the trend to get that Canadian S/W more intimately involved. Seems to me like it's shifting the mass of the system northwestward and preventing the piece that's actually the ULL from really cranking near the coast allowing the system to really explode.

at least, that's the way it seems to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:21 PM, wxeyeNH said:

Here is the total qpf from the 12Z GFS.  There was a bit of talk last night about how the GFS over amps precip over terrain areas.  I am always in the qpf hole in my location (marked with an X) and it drives me nuts.  Seems like the Worcester hills also get more precip but maybe that is correct with rising relief.  Up in my hood it makes it really hard for me to determine what my qpf will be with areas around me almost always modeled to get more.

Untitled.jpg

Expand  

Congrats coastal Maine.  We need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:21 PM, wxeyeNH said:

Here is the total qpf from the 12Z GFS.  There was a bit of talk last night about how the GFS over amps precip over terrain areas.  I am always in the qpf hole in my location (marked with an X) and it drives me nuts.  Seems like the Worcester hills also get more precip but maybe that is correct with rising relief.  Up in my hood it makes it really hard for me to determine what my qpf will be with areas around me almost always modeled to get more.

Untitled.jpg

Expand  

The GFS likes to make little sucker holes all over now in it's attempt to show every minutia of oro effects. That might be a fiction.

Another foot fr me if the GFS was correct.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:39 PM, Logan11 said:

The GFS likes to make little sucker holes all over now in it's attempt to show every minutia of oro effects. That might be a fiction.

Another foot fr me if the GFS was correct.

 

Expand  

Thank for the reply Logan.  It's been a long time since I've said hi.  Hope you enjoyed that dump the other day.  Might as well add to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:36 PM, dryslot said:

I would tend to agree, Its not like the one the other day that couldn't overcome +2c with those easterly winds.

Expand  

Right ...

See, not that you asked ...or need this pointed out or anything, but the last system was really kind of insidious in the way that it masked the GFS low level ...what I would adjective with 'egregious' warm bias.  The GFS was going to print rain for that system regardless of whether it snowed or not... so it rained, and the GFS looks brilliant - ah...yeeeah 

Just as it's attempting to do now... We'll see.  But this is better test scenario for its bias. Antecedent set up bears almost no resemblance to that last system... So if folks are perhaps jaded by that... try not to be.  It may rain? It might - okay..it's post March 1, which is an annual apocalypse to winter weather enthusiasts, anyway... so yar... rain is sort of a standard base-line probability.

Excluding climo, the synoptics really do connote a colder profile ...particularly when dynamics comes into play and so forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:46 PM, wxeyeNH said:

Thank for the reply Logan.  It's been a long time since I've said hi.  Hope you enjoyed that dump the other day.  Might as well add to it!

Expand  

Don't worry about that stuff.... the GFS is way too heavily terrain enhanced as we were talking about the other day.

Sometimes it makes sense in say strong low level upslope patterns but for synoptic precipitation it takes it too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:46 PM, wxeyeNH said:

Thank for the reply Logan.  It's been a long time since I've said hi.  Hope you enjoyed that dump the other day.  Might as well add to it!

Expand  

Hey Gene!  Yep we go   back to the ancient IRC days on the mid/late 90's.  I think this one will be better for you as it rides the coast  further up on most models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/4/2018 at 4:21 PM, wxeyeNH said:

Here is the total qpf from the 12Z GFS.  There was a bit of talk last night about how the GFS over amps precip over terrain areas.  I am always in the qpf hole in my location (marked with an X) and it drives me nuts.  Seems like the Worcester hills also get more precip but maybe that is correct with rising relief.  Up in my hood it makes it really hard for me to determine what my qpf will be with areas around me almost always modeled to get more.

Untitled.jpg

Expand  

It may be a little overdone, but I’d say it is mostly real. Strong, deep NE flow for you is kind of a killer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...