Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

March 2018 Model Discussion


WeatherFeen2000

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 606
  • Created
  • Last Reply

There is an investor , his name is Marc Faber out of Europe 

He authors a news letter called Boom Doom and Gloom 

Since 2010 his call  EVERY year is for a major stock market correction

In that time the market has gone from 10 to 25k 

Eventually he will be right , but after being wrong for 10 straight years he will never be able to claim he verified because he said the same thing everyday and missed bull market run after bull market run.

 

So toss the drones 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, allgame830 said:

Very clear that the 12z run should be farther west... when will all players be sampled? Because I feel not until then the models will not have a good handle on this??

 

The EPS did the same thing in Jan , it corrected in the SE day 4 , it corrected off OBX by day 3 and finally saw the coastal front and got the BM by day 2 

You will need to wait until 12z tomorrow and inside 48 hours for the models to really  see the N vort 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beyond the coming threat, a decent warmup awaits on the 16th.---18th., but with clouds and showers likely.  Then a return to Normal with rain chances 23rd.---26th.

The 500mb. pattern then  looks to flatten out to a borefest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PB COLTS NECK NJ said:

There is an investor , his name is Marc Faber out of Europe 

He authors a news letter called Boom Doom and Gloom 

Since 2010 his call  EVERY year is for a major stock market correction

In that time the market has gone from 10 to 25k 

Eventually he will be right , but after being wrong for 10 straight years he will never be able to claim he verified because he said the same thing everyday and missed bull market run after bull market run.

 

So toss the drones 

I'm quite familiar with him. So far, the proverbial sky hasn't fallen. I believe the last time he was "right" on a market call was during the financial crisis of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to get a coastal storm up this way when you have a deep, positively tilted trough. The remnants of our coastal storm from Wednesday are helping to keep the heights low off the East coast. We need that to retrograde faster into Canada and help to pump the ridge.

The first image is H5 on the 06z NAM. As you can see, the positioning of the ULL is flattening out the WAR and not allowing the digging trough to turn the corner.

sketched_5aa29636f243a.png

In this setup, moving that ULL more NW towards the second X would pump heights over the Atlantic and force the storm more Westward while allowing the trough to dig further Southeast before rounding the bend.

sketched_5aa296bf805f0.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A third option is that if the ULL simply moved a bit further North, it would allow for some ridging to build in over Northern New England which would create a scenario of energy trying to undercut the block, resulting in a miller B coastal storm. As it stands, the current evolution supports a suppressed and out to sea storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

It's hard to get a coastal storm up this way when you have a deep, positively tilted trough. The remnants of our coastal storm from Wednesday are helping to keep the heights low off the East coast. We need that to retrograde faster into Canada and help to pump the ridge.

The first image is H5 on the 06z NAM. As you can see, the positioning of the ULL is flattening out the WAR and not allowing the digging trough to turn the corner.

sketched_5aa29636f243a.png

In this setup, moving that ULL more NW towards the second X would pump heights over the Atlantic and force the storm more Westward while allowing the trough to dig further Southeast before rounding the bend.

sketched_5aa296bf805f0.png

In theory that can still happen... a lot can change in the next couple of days.

Let's see what the 12z runs do today... but with not everything sampled yet the final solution/consensus probably won't be until tomorrow or early Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NJwx85 said:

We need to see some improvements and in a hurry.

For example on the 12z NAM, the ULL is weaker, so the confluence to the North is weaker as well.

So then that would point to an improvement correct? but obviously we would need more of that to keep ongoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NEG NAO said:

Even though I don' like showing the NAM past 60 hours - it has corrected west since 12 hours ago quite a bit

namconus_ref_frzn_us_52.png

Agree, although the low is moving between NE and ENE at 84, which is not good; obviously that can change and just getting the low to that point is improvement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RU848789 said:

Agree, although the low is moving between NE and ENE at 84, which is not good; obviously that can change and just getting the low to that point is improvement.  

exactly - the west and north corrections is almost expected now this season - with the blocking up north one has to also wonder if this storm will be delayed and be a slow mover as it fights to move north -12z GFS should be interesting again unless it decides to lose the storm which wouldn't be surprising

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I don't like showing the NAM past 60 hours - it has corrected north and west since 12 hours ago quite a bit Also slows down the progression of the storm up the coast
namconus_ref_frzn_us_52.png&key=16ae4b4e0da95550173adf75f2aa6a22fe541831d70f5070fa2d61ba7752e97d
It isnt the mid range solutions that should be focused on (this model is N with the storm at 84 hours, this model is S with the storm, etc) but rather the subtleties in the short term that keep emerging yielding vastly different results past 48 hours.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ralph Wiggum said:
15 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:
Even though I don't like showing the NAM past 60 hours - it has corrected north and west since 12 hours ago quite a bit Also slows down the progression of the storm up the coast
namconus_ref_frzn_us_52.png&key=16ae4b4e0da95550173adf75f2aa6a22fe541831d70f5070fa2d61ba7752e97d

It isnt the mid range solutions that should be focused on (this model is N with the storm at 84 hours, this model is S with the storm, etc) but rather the subtleties in the short term that keep emerging yielding vastly different results past 48 hours.

take a look at the 500mb - it is further north then the previous run

namconus_z500a_us_46.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take a look at the 500mb - it is further north then the previous run
namconus_z500a_us_46.png&key=d91ef4b71b779d8109a611e23b729788b0a218a662ef3bd38aa96608a45da21c
Thats my point.....BIG changes in the short term are yielding wildly different results and swings model to model. Now that data is just going to start getting sampled better this N shift may become more of a trend/reality. Could be hiccup too.....admittedly my confidence in final outcome is lower than usual but these sr changes are worth paying attention to.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PuraVida said:

ICON coming in much stronger and closer although not close enough...yet.  980 low compared to 994 at hour 105.  Keep the trend coming.

IMO I would rather see a trend continue rather then a full correction for a nice hit because then it could just be discounted as a bad run and not really a trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...