Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,866
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Paulwen45
    Newest Member
    Paulwen45
    Joined

Weekend Snowfest/Rainfest/Mixed Mess?


showmethesnow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 2/14/2018 at 9:01 PM, Cobalt said:

FWIW Bernie Rayno is still very bearish. For good reason too. Still doesn't believe if everything goes right that the storm will give DC a WSW event. 

Expand  

Odds of DC getting a WSW snow are pretty low IMO, doubly so because it’s DC. Odds of WSW snow for everyone else is going up. CWG gave 30% odds of a major snowstorm, which is reasonable at this point.

  On 2/14/2018 at 9:02 PM, MN Transplant said:

I was going to say we got NAM'd, but that is actually on par with the Euro.  Even safer with the R/S line though.

Expand  

Yup, it’s like a colder euro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/14/2018 at 9:01 PM, Cobalt said:

FWIW Bernie Rayno is still very bearish. For good reason too. Still doesn't believe if everything goes right that the storm will give DC a WSW event. 

Expand  

I'm good with this.  The models have struggled with the progressive pattern in the medium and long range.  They have been pretty good about nailing down a solution in the 7248-72 hour range.  The models are in pretty good agreement that an event is going to happen.  Specifics for anyone's backyard are almost always going to be fleshed out by the Meso's as we get closer to the short range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/14/2018 at 9:06 PM, WxUSAF said:

Odds of DC getting a WSW snow are pretty low IMO, doubly so because it’s DC. Odds of WSW snow for everyone else is going up. CWG gave 30% odds of a major snowstorm, which is reasonable at this point.

Yup, it’s like a colder euro. 

Expand  

30% for moderate, not major

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/14/2018 at 4:36 PM, psuhoffman said:

The TT plots are fun and convenient but in marginal situations like this we were better off back in the day when you had to take the individual plots and look at all the layers and figure out for yourself what the precip type was.  Too many people now are just relying on that flawed algorythm on TT. 

Expand  

Anytime there's borderline temps it's best to use snowfall maps that account for ratios.  The Kuchera ratio maps on pivotalweather are probably going to be more realistic than the 10:1 TT maps for this system.  Pivotal also has a nice feature that shows you a map of the max column temp if you want to get a sense of midlevel temps without clicking on a buch of soundings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the coverage. Just tuned back in and caught up with the euro. Good analysis and great run. Nice convergence today towards a winning scenario. Getting close to writing off an all rain event for 95 and west. Amazing what a neg ao and transient 50/50 can do. Storms like this feel super rare but over time they aren't. Classic moderate event with nothing unusually complicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GEPS control drops more than 20 mm of qpf as snow on most of Maryland.  The totals on most of the rest of the members look more like the op.  There is still good spread among the members.  Some tracks to the south, and some to the north, but only 3 of 21 that don't give me at least 1" of snow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but some might not.  You can flip through the EPS members for free on weather.us.  Click on "Most recent forecast" under "Model run" and "Snow depth (in)" under "Select Parameter".  You can then go through all of the members by cycling through the "Members" drop box.  (You can use up and down arrows if you have a keyboard.)  Here's the 12z control run.

https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/virginia/m0_snow-depth-in/20180218-0600z.html

One caveat is that I'm not sure what "snow depth" really means.  For some models it appears to account for ice on the ground as well.  (If anyone knows for sure what this field means, please let us know!)  "Accumulated total precipitation" is also available for the ensemble members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/14/2018 at 9:38 PM, cae said:

I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but some might not.  You can flip through the EPS members for free on weather.us.  Click on "Most recent forecast" under "Model run" and "Snow depth (in)" under "Select Parameter".  You can then go through all of the members by cycling through the "Members" drop box.  (You can use up and down arrows if you have a keyboard.)  Here's the 12z control run.

https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/virginia/m0_snow-depth-in/20180218-0600z.html

The one caveat is that I'm not sure what "snow depth" really means.  For some models it appears to account for ice on the ground as well.  (If anyone knows for sure what this field means, please let us know!)

Expand  

Just based on comparing the charts posted earlier, it must be snowfall imo.  Thanks for the link!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/14/2018 at 9:55 PM, MD Snow said:

Happy hour GFS goes south. I don't mind it especially with other guidance showing some decent hits. It actually looks similar to it's 6z run yesterday. LOL

Expand  

Do not count out the GFS... it has been the first to sniff out more progressive solutions.  This is still a NS storm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...