Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Jan 4th 2018 Fish Bomb


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, purduewx80 said:

Seeing some consistency from the experimental Deep Thunder (an IBM/NCAR model that will replace the RPM down the road).  NYC sort of on the gradient...the 12Z run spits out 8.9" at NYC but much of Queens and Brooklyn are 12+. 

 

Please post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, purduewx80 said:

Seeing some consistency from the experimental Deep Thunder (an IBM/NCAR model that will replace the RPM down the road).  NYC sort of on the gradient...the 12Z run spits out 8.9" at NYC but much of Queens and Brooklyn are 12+. 

Lock it up. Any idea when it will be implemented? And images please 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

Seeing some consistency from the experimental Deep Thunder (an IBM/NCAR model that will replace the RPM down the road).  NYC sort of on the gradient...the 12Z run spits out 8.9" at NYC but much of Queens and Brooklyn are 12+. 

It will be interesting too see how it performs with this event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

I wish people would stop posting things like "ukie looks east" or "ukie looks west" without giving more details as to how much east or west. Is it 10 miles or 100 miles? BTW Ukie does not look any further east than last run from what was posted. 

The surface low is a good 75-100 miles WSW of where it was 24 hours ago for the 7 am Thursday timepoint.

output_oipLkL.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RU848789 said:

The surface low is a good 75-100 miles WSW of where it was 24 hours ago for the 7 am Thursday timepoint.

output_oipLkL.gif

Yeah it didn’t move the precip field a whole lot though outside of SNE.  The real oddball change was the screw job that occurred vs the prior run QPF wise from ACY down into the Delmarva 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

Model consensus still suggests a near miss overall with the main impacts out on E. LI and New England. 

However we'll probably see constant adjustments from now until when the storm gets going. 

Plenty of nowcasting likely too with short term models trends as the storm is ongoing. 

yes, the main impacts will likely be eastern long Island and New England but what do you consider a near miss. Is 3-6 a near miss in your eyes because thats very possible for NYC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

Model consensus still suggests a near miss overall with the main impacts out on E. LI and New England. 

However we'll probably see constant adjustments from now until when the storm gets going. 

Plenty of nowcasting likely too with short term models trends as the storm is ongoing. 

And BTW there is still no model consensus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

Lock it up. Any idea when it will be implemented? And images please 

unsure. it’s still experimental. i was not impressed during hurricane season and this is our first winter with access, so it remains to be seen how well it will perform.  its consistency stands out for the time being. don’t think i’m allowed to post but will try to find out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

5 or more years ago we could toss that because the UKMET was always too far to the east on coastals but it doesn’t generally have that issue anymore

Seems like it can also be too far east with big amped up systems like we are seeing now. But for some reason it can lead with weaker systems like Feb 16 and back in December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...