Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

JAN 4th Coastal


H2O

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

So the low takes a better track and we get less precip. lol. Oh the fun we have. 

As some have pointed out on twitter The UKMET and the other non high res models may not be able to pick up on the 250mb jet enhancing that precip further west of the low.  The UKMET did move the precip further west over LI and SNE but it seemed further east for the Delmarva which is odd 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowGolfBro said:

This does have a January 2000 feel to it.  We will probably get the shaft, but I'm imagining Sue Palka coming on the news at 10PM tomorrow night saying anyone who went to bed early will be in for a surprise.  Maybe the Euro has a surprise for us so I'm staying tuned

who had Jan 2000 for their weenie bingo card? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, attml said:

There is a pretty healthy low just north of South America that is forming and moving NW.  It will influence our system to move north and west and this will be a hit for our area.  You heard it here 2nd or 3rd.  :-)

http://www.intellicast.com/Storm/Hurricane/AtlanticSatellite.aspx?animate=true

This is expert level use of the weenie handbook.  Make sure this data is fed into the Euro run!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Bastardi feeling it! Shocker. From Weatherbell:

"Remember the ratios will be higher, but when we are talking about feedback development, the models like the NAM and RGEM should be best, That the Canadian global model and ensembles have seen what they have seen may be because they are not as complex so they dont see the kind of feedback that fast that the GFS does. which spins things up fast, So what happens is the that until these features get close to the verification time, the complex global models may start estimating quicker where something may form spin it up and then take off, The Canadian global is likely not as sophisticated as the Euro so it does not start the feedback, However as we get closer, the regional models should have the better handle and NAM makes sense to me, Think about it, how does a storm blowing up move away from the trough trying to capture it with height rises to its northeast and over a warm ocean. So a correction west makes sense, In any case using higher ratios we see that this could be a shut down storm in the coastal mid Atlantic to New England and perhaps as far west as DC to NYC in the I-95 corridor"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SnowGolfBro said:

This does have a January 2000 feel to it.  We will probably get the shaft, but I'm imagining Sue Palka coming on the news at 10PM tomorrow night saying anyone who went to bed early will be in for a surprise.  Maybe the Euro has a surprise for us so I'm staying tuned

I've heard multiple numerical weather prediction specialists opine that Jan 2000 will never happen again due to the advancements in their craft.  Every time I hear it, i just shake my head.  I am NOT suggesting that necessarily this storm is the one, merely making an observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...