Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,906
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

January 3-4 Storm Thread part II


rduwx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/2/2018 at 2:21 PM, Poimen said:

The NAM's composite radar is not translating to the surface for many on the western side. Looks like a raging virga storm. 

Expand  

Yeah I was thinking it would be better this run, but still hardly anything but virga... maybe the air is to dry in our neck of the woods?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharp western edge is due to the dry air in place, the lack of overrunning GOM action beforehand to moisten the atmosphere, and the dynamically driven nature of the banding around a bombing SLP. There will a sharp cutoff somewhere in NC which will leave much weeping and gnashing of teeth on this board. One of these days you guys will trust uncle HKY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/2/2018 at 2:25 PM, Cold Rain said:

This may turn out to be one of the best H5 snowstorms we've ever had, while we watch a few flakes struggle to make it to the surface.  Looks good for the I-95 corridor so far.

Expand  

It is interesting that meaningful precip is not making it inland....similar to the globals.  Thought based on that, PGV would be well over 1"QPF and they are right on the border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/2/2018 at 2:24 PM, packbacker said:

That was the 6z run...the 12z was weaker, for whatever reason.  The track on the 12z was better, but the h5 low was weaker.  Why QPF was down I guess.  Still, will take it.

qpf_acc.us_ma.png

Expand  

Yeah, I realized after I posted, I was looking at the 6z map on the bottom.  Still, a minor change.  Hopefully, the low position translates closer to the coast in future runs.  I still remain surprised at the lack of modeled QPF inland.  But, .2 should be good for about 3".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/2/2018 at 2:28 PM, Cold Rain said:

Yeah, I realized after I posted, I was looking at the 6z map on the bottom.  Still, a minor change.  Hopefully, the low position translates closer to the coast in future runs.  I still remain surprised at the lack of modeled QPF inland.  But, .2 should be good for about 3".

Expand  

SLP's on the NAM's both shifted west a hair...just need some magic on getting QPF back to us.  The 3km track is usually perfect for our area.

 

refcmp_ptype.us_ma.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...