Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,605
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Holidays 2017-18 Mid-Long Range Disco 2


WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Agree. It's like they sniff out the potential correctly,  get bogged down/confused by the chaos,  then come to a more accurate forecast that happens to prove their original identification of the threat potential as being accurate,  albeit imprecise. 

That's a great way of putting it. Agree 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

I agree. It happens enough to not be a coincidence. The tricky part is when a storm reappears it can be a significantly different way of getting there than the one that vanished. This one didn't really vanish though. It's been around in some form or another on various models pretty much daily. An usually high number of significant changes along the way too. Kind of annoying honeslty.

The ensembles seem to want to give us snow, one way or another, in the next 7 days. My gut says the southern stream low will deliver late week. Similar to what occurred a couple weeks ago, incremental ticks northward, with maybe some ns interaction(in a good way) this time. Nothing huge, but a totally acceptable, cold, high ratio 2-4 type deal, with a bit more to the south of our region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone hates this run, but the trends were a little better as far as the ridging out west, especially from 12z to 18z to now 0z. Clearly better amplitude to the west coast ridge. And at hour 84 I could see how if the interaction goes just a bit differently the shortwaves could at least partially phase. I really don’t think this is far off as people might think. Still time for those things to trend better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Just a little out of sync. NS dug in more but the ss had a little more shear so it didn't bloom as much. 2 small changes away from a decent light event. Still in the game regardless of qpf output on this run. 

Yeah I agree with this. Some subtle modifications and we can get 2-4 out of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, C.A.P.E. said:

Yeah I agree with this. Some subtle modifications and we can get 2-4 out of this.

I did a bit of a mental reset today. I'm chasing a newly found light event. Those earlier runs with big hits had it all wrong with a lot of things so dwelling on that is fruitless. There a ways to get something from a weak pac shortwave and what appears to be a strengthening ns shortwave. And they're pretty close together. Knowing the final evolution is at least 48 hours away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Chill said:

I did a bit of a mental reset today. I'm chasing a newly found light event. Those earlier runs with big hits had it all wrong with a lot of things so dwelling on that is fruitless. There a ways to get something from a weak pac shortwave and what appears to be a strengthening ns shortwave. And there pretty close together. Knowing the final evolution is at least 48 hours away. 

I can't seem to get my mind off those earlier runs, so really anything that doesn't turn into something resembling that will be disappointing to me at this point, and especially if northeast of us gets hit hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...