Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

How Important Is The -NAO For Top 10 Snowstorms?


bluewave
 Share

Recommended Posts

I put together a collection of the top 10 snowstorms from Newark to Islip since 1950. This is when the NAO data became regularly available. Nearly all the events at our 5 major climate sites occurred following a -NAO. The lowest NAO readings were included up to 10 days before the events. The few exceptions to the pattern were in 2013,2015, and January 1978. February 2013 featured a very strong STJ following the early El Nino development which faded out in the fall. January 2015 and 1978 were during a weak El Nino. So on a few occasions the strong STJ was able to overcome the +NAO. Also notice how many storms have happened during our recent historic run.

http://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.nao.index.b500101.current.ascii

NYC

27.5...1-24-16....-0.890

26.9...2-12-06....-0.537

20.9...2-26-10....-1.299

20.2..1-8-96......-.1.719

20.0...12-27-10...-1.533

19.8...2-17-03...+0.654

19.0...1-27-11....-0.944

17.7...2-7-78.....-0.865

17.6...2-12-83...-0.690

17.4...2-4-61.....-0.126

EWR

27.8...1-8-96.....-1.719

24.3...1-23-16....-0.890

24.2...12-27-10..-1.533

22.6...2-4-61......-0.126

22.3...2-17-03....+0.654

21.3..2-12.-06....-0.537

20.4...12-12-60...-0.078

19.0...2-7-78......-0.865

18.9...1-27-11...-0.944

18.2...3-19-56...-0.225

JFK

30.5...1-24-16...-0.890

25.8...2-17-03...+0.654

24.1...2-4-61....-0.126

21.7...2-12-83...-0.690

20.7...1-8-96....-1.719

20.2...2-10-69...-0.678

18.1...2-5-61....-0.126

16.7...2-12-06...-0.537

15.6...12-27-10...-1.533

14.5...12-20-09...-2.111

LGA

28.2...1-24-16...-0.890

25.4...2-12-06...-0.537

23.8...1-8-96...-1.719

22.0...2-12-83...-0.690

19.0...2-5-61...-0.126

17.3...1-27-11...-0.944

16.5...2-17-03..+0.654

16.1...2-10-69...-0.678

15.3...3-4-60....-1.095

14.9...12-20-95..-1.581

ISP

27.8...2-9-13....+0.219

25.9...2-7-78....-0.865

24.9...1-27-15...+0.235

23.9...12-20-09...-2.111

23.7...1-24-16...-0.890

20.1...2-12-83...-0.690

19.9...2-12-06...-0.537

17.8..1-20-78...+0.234

17.0...1-8-96...-1.719

17.0...2-10-69...-0.678

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bluewave said:

I put together a collection of the top 10 snowstorms from Newark to Islip since 1950. This is when the NAO data became regularly available. Nearly all the events at our 5 major climate sites occurred following a -NAO. The lowest NAO readings were included up to 10 days before the events. The few exceptions to the pattern were in 2013,2015, and January 1978. February 2013 featured a very strong STJ following the early El Nino development which faded out in the fall. January 2015 and 1978 were during a weak El Nino. So on a few occasions the strong STJ was able to overcome the +NAO. Also notice how many storms have happened during our recent historic run.

http://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.nao.index.b500101.current.ascii

NYC

27.5...1-24-16....-0.890

26.9...2-12-06....-0.537

20.9...2-26-10....-1.299

20.2..1-8-96......-.1.719

20.0...12-27-10...-1.533

19.8...2-17-03...+0.654

19.0...1-27-11....-0.944

17.7...2-7-78.....-0.865

17.6...2-12-83...-0.690

17.4...2-4-61.....-0.126

EWR

27.8...1-8-96.....-1.719

24.3...1-23-16....-0.890

24.2...12-27-10..-1.533

22.6...2-4-61......-0.126

22.3...2-17-03....+0.654

21.3..2-12.-06....-0.537

20.4...12-12-60...-0.078

19.0...2-7-78......-0.865

18.9...1-27-11...-0.944

18.2...3-19-56...-0.225

JFK

30.5...1-24-16...-0.890

25.8...2-17-03...+0.654

24.1...2-4-61....-0.126

21.7...2-12-83...-0.690

20.7...1-8-96....-1.719

20.2...2-10-69...-0.678

18.1...2-5-61....-0.126

16.7...2-12-06...-0.537

15.6...12-27-10...-1.533

14.5...12-20-09...-2.111

LGA

28.2...1-24-16...-0.890

25.4...2-12-06...-0.537

23.8...1-8-96...-1.719

22.0...2-12-83...-0.690

19.0...2-5-61...-0.126

17.3...1-27-11...-0.944

16.5...2-17-03..+0.654

16.1...2-10-69...-0.678

15.3...3-4-60....-1.095

14.9...12-20-95..-1.581

ISP

27.8...2-9-13....+0.219

25.9...2-7-78....-0.865

24.9...1-27-15...+0.235

23.9...12-20-09...-2.111

23.7...1-24-16...-0.890

20.1...2-12-83...-0.690

19.9...2-12-06...-0.537

17.8..1-20-78...+0.234

17.0...1-8-96...-1.719

17.0...2-10-69...-0.678

 

 

 

From what I see here, in central NJ, we need a neg NAO for a big storm. The storms that were not during that phase busted here but delivered to CT and LI. Seems clear evidence to me. Of course, anything is possible I guess.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bluewave said:

I put together a collection of the top 10 snowstorms from Newark to Islip since 1950. This is when the NAO data became regularly available. Nearly all the events at our 5 major climate sites occurred following a -NAO. The lowest NAO readings were included up to 10 days before the events. The few exceptions to the pattern were in 2013,2015, and January 1978. February 2013 featured a very strong STJ following the early El Nino development which faded out in the fall. January 2015 and 1978 were during a weak El Nino. So on a few occasions the strong STJ was able to overcome the +NAO. Also notice how many storms have happened during our recent historic run.

http://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.nao.index.b500101.current.ascii

NYC

27.5...1-24-16....-0.890

26.9...2-12-06....-0.537

20.9...2-26-10....-1.299

20.2..1-8-96......-.1.719

20.0...12-27-10...-1.533

19.8...2-17-03...+0.654

19.0...1-27-11....-0.944

17.7...2-7-78.....-0.865

17.6...2-12-83...-0.690

17.4...2-4-61.....-0.126

EWR

27.8...1-8-96.....-1.719

24.3...1-23-16....-0.890

24.2...12-27-10..-1.533

22.6...2-4-61......-0.126

22.3...2-17-03....+0.654

21.3..2-12.-06....-0.537

20.4...12-12-60...-0.078

19.0...2-7-78......-0.865

18.9...1-27-11...-0.944

18.2...3-19-56...-0.225

JFK

30.5...1-24-16...-0.890

25.8...2-17-03...+0.654

24.1...2-4-61....-0.126

21.7...2-12-83...-0.690

20.7...1-8-96....-1.719

20.2...2-10-69...-0.678

18.1...2-5-61....-0.126

16.7...2-12-06...-0.537

15.6...12-27-10...-1.533

14.5...12-20-09...-2.111

LGA

28.2...1-24-16...-0.890

25.4...2-12-06...-0.537

23.8...1-8-96...-1.719

22.0...2-12-83...-0.690

19.0...2-5-61...-0.126

17.3...1-27-11...-0.944

16.5...2-17-03..+0.654

16.1...2-10-69...-0.678

15.3...3-4-60....-1.095

14.9...12-20-95..-1.581

ISP

27.8...2-9-13....+0.219

25.9...2-7-78....-0.865

24.9...1-27-15...+0.235

23.9...12-20-09...-2.111

23.7...1-24-16...-0.890

20.1...2-12-83...-0.690

19.9...2-12-06...-0.537

17.8..1-20-78...+0.234

17.0...1-8-96...-1.719

17.0...2-10-69...-0.678

 

 

 

Chris, changing from one phase to the other is probably the most important factor.

Didn't PD2 occur during a +NAO? But it had switched just a few days before the storm?

2002-03 wasn't a very NEG NAO winter was it?  But we had many switches between phases, which is what made it so stormy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, weatherpruf said:

From what I see here, in central NJ, we need a neg NAO for a big storm. The storms that were not during that phase busted here but delivered to CT and LI. Seems clear evidence to me. Of course, anything is possible I guess.

Yeah, PHL was similar to the NYC Metro and LI stations. The only top 10 snowstorm without a -NAO since 1950 was PD2.

PHL

31.0...1-8-96.....-1.719

28.5...2-6-10......-0.985

23.2..12-20-09...-2.111

22.4...1-24-16....-0.890

21.3...2-12-83....-0.690

18.7...2-17-03...+0.654

15.8...2-12-06...-0.537

15.1..1-27-11...-0.944

14.6..12-12-60..-0.078

14.3...2-19-79...-0.633

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Paragon said:

Chris, changing from one phase to the other is probably the most important factor.

Didn't PD2 occur during a +NAO? But it had switched just a few days before the storm?

2002-03 wasn't a very NEG NAO winter was it?  But we had many switches between phases, which is what made it so stormy.

Yeah, we have had top 10 storms near the changes and in the middle of -NAO events. 2002-2003 was interesting in that the -NAO was mostly front-loaded into December and the first week of January. PD2 was unique since it occurred during a +NAO run that began during the second week of January. But we had the El Nino STJ along with a strong -EPO block.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Yeah, we have had top 10 events near the changes and in the middle of -NAO events. 2002-2003 was interesting in that the -NAO was mostly front-loaaded into December and the first week of January. PD2 was unique in that it occurred during a +NAO run that began during the second week of January. But we had the El Nino STJ along with a strong -EPO block.

That's right and we had a pretty significant storm before PD2 but it gets lost because of the historic nature of what came after.  The Pre-PD2 storm dumped 9 inches of snow, I think?

What did we have for the April 2003 snowstorm?  -NAO? That was another big one, I would consider it historic for us in Nassau County considering it was April.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Paragon said:

That's right and we had a pretty significant storm before PD2 but it gets lost because of the historic nature of what came after.  The Pre-PD2 storm dumped 9 inches of snow, I think?

What did we have for the April 2003 snowstorm?  -NAO? That was another big one, I would consider it historic for us in Nassau County considering it was April.

 

That April 2003 snowstorm happened just a few days after a brief -NAO drop.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bluewave said:

Yeah, we have had top 10 storms near the changes and in the middle of -NAO events. 2002-2003 was interesting in that the -NAO was mostly front-loaded into December and the first week of January. PD2 was unique since it occurred during a +NAO run that began during the second week of January. But we had the El Nino STJ along with a strong -EPO block.

Much different synoptic setup than our typical blockbusters too.  Wasn't PDII essentially just a humongous overrunning event?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's still mostly -NAO, the storms that just missed the top ten since 2000 in NYC included 3 +NAO events. These were the 10-14 inch snowfalls.

14.0...12-6-03...-0.197

13.8...1-23-05...+0.204

13.3..1-26-11...-9.444

12.5...2-14-14...+0.680

12.0...12-31-00...-1.227

11.5...1-22-14...-0.529

11.4...2-9-13...+0.219

10.9...12-20-09...-2.111

10.3...1-28-04...-1.449

10.0...2-11-10..-1.202

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the 6 to just under 10 inch storms in NYC since 2000, there was an increase to 5-6 +NAO storms. 

9.8...1-27-15...+0.235

9.4...2-10-17...+0.290

9.1...1-12-11....-1.909

8.3...3-2-09...+0.502

8.0...2-4-14...+0.246

7.7...3-1-05...-1.379

7.6...3-15-17...-0.164...note...the NAO was only briefly negative and mostly positive before the storm...This allowed the record snowfall for the interior but not the coast

7.5...3-6-15...+0.619

6.3...1-7-17...-0.774

6.0...2-23-08...-0.422

6.0...2-25-05...-1.379

6.0...12-6-02...-1.385

6.0...1-22-01...-0.438

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Eduardo said:

Much different synoptic setup than our typical blockbusters too.  Wasn't PDII essentially just a humongous overrunning event?

Yeah, it was a long duration overrunning event. Great combination of El Nino STJ and -EPO generated very strong Arctic high to our north. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...