Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2017 Mid-Long Range Disco 2


WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, mitchnick said:

the other issue is, will the system get squished while the trough is to our north and then come up the back side warm once the trough to the NE pulls out

IMHO- the 12z gfs sucks. Yea, shows some confluence/cad or whatever but the overall progression is spot on for a strong SE ridge problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I’m guessing that all we see is a transient 2-4 day period of a SE ridge which will largely be the result of some sort of cutting system.  Even the GFS MJO forecast (which probably is wrong anyway) wouldn’t ordinarily telocconect to a SE ridge 

I'll feel better to get some model to support that. But we're not going to get any model to come up with the ultimate correct (or as correct as possible) solution until a week from today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to recap for anything by day 10 on this run to occur you need for all these things to be modeled correctly:

1. Enough Greenland ridging to occur to keep the heights over the eastern US supressed.

2. The trough in the southwest at 180 to cutoff. Not enough to completely detach itself from broader trough (otherwise it will be cold and dry) but enough to let northern portion of trough to head east and force the boundary into the Mid-Atlantic.

3. A near triple phaser to occur between multiple northern stream waves and the SW cutoff at hour 240 which completely blows up the downstream troughing over the east and allows the system to eject into the midwest. 

Long story short...it's safe to say this ain't happening. But I think the trends were positive up to day 8/9. That final phase at hour 240 is suspect to me. If that doesn't happen or happens a little differently I think we could have seen a better solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WhiteoutWX said:

Just to recap for anything by day 10 on this run to occur you need for all these things to be modeled correctly:

1. Enough Greenland ridging to occur to keep the heights over the eastern US supressed.

2. The trough in the southwest at 180 to cutoff. Not enough to completely detach itself from broader trough (otherwise it will be cold and dry) but enough to let northern portion of trough to head east and force the boundary into the Mid-Atlantic.

3. A near triple phaser to occur between multiple northern stream waves and the SW cutoff at hour 240 which completely blows up the downstream troughing over the east and allows the system to eject into the midwest. 

Long story short...it's safe to say this ain't happening. But I think the trends were positive up to day 8/9. That final phase at hour 240 is suspect to me. If that doesn't happen or happens a little differently I think we could have seen a better solution.

Excellent post. Thank you for this. I'm going to be skeptical of any op rushing things. Of course I hope the sw trough/se ridge is quick and transient...but I don't think it will play out like that. Not mad at the GL ridging allowing for some confluence/compressed flow north of us. That's a pretty typical way for us to get CAD going even with a SE ridge. Overall though, the gfs op run wasn't good for snowstorms in the east. Especially south of new england. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

Excellent post. Thank you for this. I'm going to be skeptical of any op rushing things. Of course I hope the sw trough/se ridge is quick and transient...but I don't think it will play out like that. Not mad at the GL ridging allowing for some confluence/compressed flow north of us. That's a pretty typical way for us to get CAD going even with a SE ridge. Overall though, the gfs op run wasn't good for snowstorms in the east. Especially south of new england. 

I agree it for sure is not a classic east coast snowstorm pattern IMO, but it screams mixed bag/ice scenario possibilities. Which for some are less fun than others. To me, wintry weather is wintry weather so I'll take it. But I know most people don't like losing their power or having tree damage so I understand if most are unenthused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, WhiteoutWX said:

I agree it for sure is not a classic east coast snowstorm pattern IMO, but it screams mixed bag/ice scenario possibilities. Which for some are less fun than others. To me, wintry weather is wintry weather so I'll take it. But I know most people don't like losing their power or having tree damage so I understand if most are unenthused. 

Heck yea man. Same page here. Winter wx is winter wx. Period. End of discussion. lol. Especially in this area where we can get shut out of winter wx for the entire met winter. haha. A Christmas pellet/ice storm is completely acceptable. Damaging ice is rare here so I'm not worried about that. Unless we get a cold hp on roids moving across, I doubt a damaging ice storm is even in play. The middle of the country however seems to be pretty ripe for some sort of ice storm that could in fact be damaging. 

The CAD sig is real. Even the ens show it in the long range which is not very common at all. Who gets what is something that literally can't be answered for a week but any op or ens run that favors a CAD setup d8+ is a check mark in the win column. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any site that can help me learn more about the weather patterns, upper level patterns?  I would really appreciate it.  I know the basics of reading the maps and models.  I know a little about how troughs and ridges Influence our weather. I don’t know about much about 500mb heights, stratospheric warming, cold air damming, MJO, low placements, high pressure placements, energy digging, and different maps you look at making your calculations.  Also what does EPO mean? Sorry to be a pain.  Just trying to learn. Thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

GEFS much better look irt to positioning of EPO ridge, SW trof axis, PV influence, and SER centered around days 10/11

 

See, I use the MJO to see through to that kind of thing.  I seriously believe ops follow ensembles follow teleconnections foolow MJO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope the EPS trends the same way as the GEFS. Notable shift across the board to speed up the SW trough and knocking down the SE ridge. This 5 day mean is about as good as you can get around here for possible winter wx in the face of a +NAO. It's definitely a cold NA pattern as well but progressive flow so not a clean snow pattern. Completely acceptable though. 

 

gfs-ens_z500aMean_nhem_12.png

 

gfs-ens_T2maMean_nhem_11.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said:

I had to fetch a different map layer to see it.

The best way to identify CAD is MSLP plots. When you have stout HP centered between Toronto and Montreal it's going to push N-NE flow down the piedmont. For a ens mean pressure panel @ d8+, the one I posted is a really strong signal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...